• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哥伦比亚登革热病媒控制干预措施的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of a Dengue Vector Control Intervention in Colombia.

作者信息

Taborda Alejandra, Chamorro Cindy, Quintero Juliana, Carrasquilla Gabriel, Londoño Darío

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Apr 18;107(1):180-5. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0669.

DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.20-0669
PMID:35436764
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9294672/
Abstract

Dengue is a public health problem in Colombia and in the municipality of Girardot, an area of high risk for dengue transmission. We present the results of an economic evaluation from the societal perspective and 1-year time horizon comparing the regular control program for dengue prevention versus an intervention that comprised an environmental management strategy by covering the most Aedes aegypti productive breeding sites with insecticide covers, community actions, and educational activities. The effectiveness of the intervention was measured as the reduction in probability of dengue infection obtained from a community trial. Resource use was estimated from clinical records that were validated by clinical experts; unit costs were taken from national tariffs. Patient costs were obtained from a household survey. We found that the intervention generated an additional cost of USD20.9 per household and an incremental effectiveness of 0.00173 (reduction in the probability of reported dengue cases). Overall, both alternatives generate similar effectiveness, but the new intervention was associated with increasing costs. We conclude the new intervention is a potentially cost-effective option in areas where high prevalence of dengue exists.

摘要

登革热是哥伦比亚以及吉拉尔多市的一个公共卫生问题,该地区是登革热传播的高风险区域。我们从社会角度和1年的时间跨度呈现了一项经济评估的结果,比较了登革热预防常规控制项目与一项干预措施,该干预措施包括一项环境管理策略,即通过用杀虫剂覆盖物覆盖埃及伊蚊最主要的繁殖场所、开展社区行动和教育活动。干预措施的有效性通过社区试验得出的登革热感染概率降低情况来衡量。资源使用从经临床专家验证的临床记录中估算得出;单位成本取自国家收费标准。患者成本通过家庭调查获得。我们发现,该干预措施每户产生了20.9美元的额外成本,增量有效性为0.00173(报告的登革热病例概率降低)。总体而言,两种方案产生的有效性相似,但新的干预措施与成本增加相关。我们得出结论,在登革热高流行地区,新的干预措施是一个潜在的具有成本效益的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9294672/b3124161ff7e/tpmd200669f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9294672/5cf7fef2f4e4/tpmd200669f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9294672/ba655b2243e9/tpmd200669f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9294672/b3124161ff7e/tpmd200669f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9294672/5cf7fef2f4e4/tpmd200669f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9294672/ba655b2243e9/tpmd200669f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/deab/9294672/b3124161ff7e/tpmd200669f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a Dengue Vector Control Intervention in Colombia.哥伦比亚登革热病媒控制干预措施的成本效益
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022 Apr 18;107(1):180-5. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0669.
2
Innovative dengue vector control interventions in Latin America: what do they cost?拉丁美洲创新型登革热病媒控制干预措施:成本几何?
Pathog Glob Health. 2016;110(1):14-24. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2016.1142057.
3
Dengue vector management using insecticide treated materials and targeted interventions on productive breeding-sites in Guatemala.危地马拉使用经杀虫剂处理的材料进行登革热媒介管理和有针对性的生产性繁殖地干预。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 30;12:931. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-931.
4
Effectiveness and feasibility of long-lasting insecticide-treated curtains and water container covers for dengue vector control in Colombia: a cluster randomised trial.长效杀虫剂处理蚊帐和盛水容器盖用于哥伦比亚登革热媒介控制的有效性和可行性:一项整群随机试验
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;109(2):116-25. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru208.
5
Risk of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya transmission in the metropolitan area of Cucuta, Colombia: cross-sectional analysis, baseline for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a novel vector tool for water containers.哥伦比亚库库塔大都市区登革热、寨卡和基孔肯雅热传播风险:横断面分析,新型水容器病媒控制工具群组随机对照试验的基线
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15893-4.
6
Reduction in dengue cases observed during mass control of Aedes (Stegomyia) in street catch basins in an endemic urban area in Colombia.在哥伦比亚一个地方性流行的城市地区,对街道集水井中的埃及伊蚊(白纹伊蚊)进行大规模控制期间,观察到登革热病例减少。
Acta Trop. 2014 Apr;132:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2013.12.019. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
7
[Evaluation of an educational module on dengue and Aedes aegypti for schoolchildren in Honduras].[对洪都拉斯学童开展的登革热和埃及伊蚊教育模块评估]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004 Aug;16(2):84-94. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892004000800003.
8
Effectiveness of an intervention for Aedes aegypti control scaled-up under an inter-sectoral approach in a Colombian city hyper-endemic for dengue virus.在哥伦比亚登革热病毒高度流行的城市,采用跨部门方法扩大伊蚊控制干预措施的效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230486. eCollection 2020.
9
Costs of dengue prevention and incremental cost of dengue outbreak control in Guantanamo, Cuba.古巴关塔那摩的登革热预防成本和登革热疫情控制的额外成本。
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Jan;17(1):123-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02881.x. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
10
The economic impact and cost-effectiveness of combined vector-control and dengue vaccination strategies in Thailand: results from a dynamic transmission model.泰国联合病媒控制和登革热疫苗接种策略的经济影响和成本效益:来自动态传播模型的结果。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Oct 23;14(10):e0008805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008805. eCollection 2020 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive scoping review of global educational strategies and outcomes in aedes-borne disease control.关于伊蚊传播疾病控制的全球教育策略及成果的全面范围综述。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Oct 8;82(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01412-3.
2
Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention in Adults to Promote Control Behaviors Against Dengue: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项针对成年人的护理教育干预措施促进登革热防控行为的效果:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 23;13:e54286. doi: 10.2196/54286.
3
Dengue in Cebu City, Philippines: A Pilot Study of Predictive Models and Visualizations for Public Health.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of an intervention for Aedes aegypti control scaled-up under an inter-sectoral approach in a Colombian city hyper-endemic for dengue virus.在哥伦比亚登革热病毒高度流行的城市,采用跨部门方法扩大伊蚊控制干预措施的效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230486. eCollection 2020.
2
Evaluation of intensified dengue control measures with interrupted time series analysis in the Panadura Medical Officer of Health division in Sri Lanka: a case study and cost-effectiveness analysis.斯里兰卡帕纳杜拉卫生官员分区强化登革热控制措施的评价:一项病例研究和成本效益分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2019 May;3(5):e211-e218. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(19)30057-9.
3
菲律宾宿务市的登革热:公共卫生预测模型和可视化的试点研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2023 Dec 11;110(1):179-187. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0250. Print 2024 Jan 3.
Transmission scenarios of major vector-borne diseases in Colombia, 1990-2016.
1990 - 2016年哥伦比亚主要媒介传播疾病的传播情况
Biomedica. 2017 Mar 29;37(0):27-40. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.v37i0.3769.
4
The global economic burden of dengue: a systematic analysis.登革热的全球经济负担:系统分析。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Aug;16(8):935-41. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00146-8. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
5
The Burden of Dengue and the Financial Cost to Colombia, 2010-2012.2010 - 2012年登革热在哥伦比亚的负担及经济成本
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 May 4;94(5):1065-1072. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0280. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
6
The global burden of dengue: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.登革热的全球负担:来自《2013年全球疾病负担研究》的分析
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;16(6):712-723. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00026-8. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
7
[Estimation of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) productivity in households and public spaces in a dengue endemic city in Colombia].[哥伦比亚登革热流行城市家庭和公共场所埃及伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)繁殖力的评估]
Biomedica. 2015 Apr-Jun;35(2):258-68. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572015000200014.
8
Effectiveness and feasibility of long-lasting insecticide-treated curtains and water container covers for dengue vector control in Colombia: a cluster randomised trial.长效杀虫剂处理蚊帐和盛水容器盖用于哥伦比亚登革热媒介控制的有效性和可行性:一项整群随机试验
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;109(2):116-25. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru208.
9
Economic evaluation of an area-wide integrated pest management program to control the Asian tiger mosquito in New Jersey.新泽西州控制亚洲虎蚊的全区域综合虫害管理计划的经济评估。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 22;9(10):e111014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111014. eCollection 2014.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis: a proposal of new reporting standards in statistical analysis.成本效益分析:统计分析中新报告标准的一项提议。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(2):443-60. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2013.860157.