• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统形态学评估在预测囊胚形成方面仍发挥作用吗?

Does conventional morphological evaluation still play a role in predicting blastocyst formation?

作者信息

Jiang Xiaoming, Cai Jiali, Liu Lanlan, Liu Zhenfang, Wang Wenjie, Chen Jinhua, Yang Chao, Geng Jie, Ma Caihui, Ren Jianzhi

机构信息

Reproductive Medicine Center, Xiamen University Affiliated Chenggong Hospital, Xiamen, 361003, Fujian, China.

School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Apr 19;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00945-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12958-022-00945-y
PMID:35439999
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9016972/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advanced models including time-lapse imaging and artificial intelligence technologies have been used to predict blastocyst formation. However, the conventional morphological evaluation of embryos is still widely used. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the predictive power of conventional morphological evaluation regarding blastocyst formation.

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of data from 15,613 patients receiving blastocyst culture from January 2013 through December 2020 in our institution were reviewed. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to establish the morphology-based model. To estimate whether including more features regarding patient characteristics and cycle parameters improve the predicting power, we also establish models including 27 more features with either LASSO regression or XGbosst. The predicted number of blastocyst were associated with the observed number of the blastocyst and were used to predict the blastocyst transfer cancellation either in fresh or frozen cycles.

RESULTS

Based on early cleavage and routine observed morphological parameters (cell number, fragmentation, and symmetry), the GEE model predicted blastocyst formation with an AUC of 0.779(95%CI: 0.77-0.787) and an accuracy of 74.7%(95%CI: 73.9%-75.5%) in the validation set. LASSO regression model and XGboost model based on the combination of cycle characteristics and embryo morphology yielded similar predicting power with AUCs of 0.78(95%CI: 0.771-0.789) and 0.754(95%CI: 0.745-0.763), respectively. For per-cycle blastocyst yield, the predicted number of blastocysts using morphological parameters alone strongly correlated with observed blastocyst number (r = 0.897, P < 0.0001) and predicted blastocyst transfer cancel with an AUC of 0.926((95%CI: 0.911-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The data suggested that routine morphology observation remained a feasible tool to support an informed decision regarding the day of transfer. However, models based on the combination of cycle characteristics and embryo morphology do not increase the predicting power significantly.

摘要

背景

包括延时成像和人工智能技术在内的先进模型已被用于预测囊胚形成。然而,传统的胚胎形态学评估仍被广泛使用。本研究的目的是评估传统形态学评估对囊胚形成的预测能力。

方法

回顾性评估了2013年1月至2020年12月在本机构接受囊胚培养的15613例患者的数据。使用广义估计方程(GEE)建立基于形态学的模型。为了评估纳入更多患者特征和周期参数是否能提高预测能力,我们还使用LASSO回归或XGboost建立了包含另外27个特征的模型。预测的囊胚数量与观察到的囊胚数量相关,并用于预测新鲜周期或冷冻周期中囊胚移植取消的情况。

结果

基于早期分裂和常规观察的形态学参数(细胞数量、碎片和对称性),GEE模型在验证集中预测囊胚形成的AUC为0.779(95%CI:0.77 - 0.787),准确率为74.7%(95%CI:73.9% - 75.5%)。基于周期特征和胚胎形态学组合的LASSO回归模型和XGboost模型具有相似的预测能力,AUC分别为0.78(95%CI:0.771 - 0.789)和0.754(95%CI:0.745 - 0.763)。对于每个周期的囊胚产量,仅使用形态学参数预测的囊胚数量与观察到的囊胚数量高度相关(r = 0.897,P < 0.0001),预测囊胚移植取消的AUC为0.926(95%CI:0.911 - 0.94)。

结论

数据表明,常规形态学观察仍然是支持关于移植日做出明智决策的可行工具。然而,基于周期特征和胚胎形态学组合的模型并没有显著提高预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c17/9016972/5f5c837d21ff/12958_2022_945_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c17/9016972/5f5c837d21ff/12958_2022_945_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c17/9016972/5f5c837d21ff/12958_2022_945_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Does conventional morphological evaluation still play a role in predicting blastocyst formation?传统形态学评估在预测囊胚形成方面仍发挥作用吗?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Apr 19;20(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12958-022-00945-y.
2
Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study.1730个活检囊胚的非整倍体、标准形态学评估与胚胎发育动力学之间的相关性:一项连续性病例系列研究
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2245-54. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew183. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
3
Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.值得等待吗?第 7 天的囊胚具有较低的非整倍体率,但与第 5 天和第 6 天的囊胚具有相似的持续着床率。
Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1632-1639. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez138.
4
Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.囊胚特征、滋养层活检和其他实验室操作与解冻后行为和着床的关系。
Hum Reprod. 2018 Nov 1;33(11):1992-2001. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey291.
5
Development of a generally applicable morphokinetic algorithm capable of predicting the implantation potential of embryos transferred on Day 3.开发一种能够预测第3天移植胚胎着床潜力的通用形态动力学算法。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Oct;31(10):2231-44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew188. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
6
Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.标准囊胚形态、整倍体与着床的相关性:两个中心涉及 956 枚筛选囊胚的观察性研究。
Hum Reprod. 2014 Jun;29(6):1173-81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
7
Morphokinetic analysis and embryonic prediction for blastocyst formation through an integrated time-lapse system.通过集成延时系统对囊胚形成进行形态动力学分析和胚胎预测。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Feb;105(2):376-84.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.001. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
8
Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.根据囊胚形态和扩张阶段进行新鲜或玻璃化胚胎移植后的妊娠及分娩结局,以及延迟发育的培养策略。
Hum Reprod. 2016 Aug;31(8):1685-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew127. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
9
Delayed blastulation, multinucleation, and expansion grade are independently associated with live-birth rates in frozen blastocyst transfer cycles.囊胚孵化延迟、多核化以及扩张等级与冷冻囊胚移植周期中的活产率独立相关。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Nov;106(6):1370-1378. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1095. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
How slow is too slow? A comprehensive portrait of Day 7 blastocysts and their clinical value standardized through artificial intelligence.胚胎培养至第 7 天速度多慢算太慢?通过人工智能对第 7 天囊胚进行全面描绘及其临床价值标准化。
Hum Reprod. 2022 May 30;37(6):1134-1147. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac080.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of blastocyst development using cleavage-stage embryo metrics and maternal age.利用卵裂期胚胎指标和产妇年龄预测囊胚发育
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10298-2.
2
Development and validation of machine learning models for predicting blastocyst yield in IVF cycles.用于预测体外受精周期中囊胚产量的机器学习模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):22631. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06998-4.
3
Frozen-thawed double cleavage-stage or frozen-thawed single day 6 blastocyst stage embryo transfer: which is preferable for patients younger than 35 without day 5 blastocyst formation?

本文引用的文献

1
Association of ovarian stimulation and embryonic aneuploidy in in vitro fertilization cycles with preimplantation genetic testing: A narrative systematic review.体外受精周期中卵巢刺激和胚胎非整倍体与植入前遗传学检测的关联:叙述性系统评价。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022 Apr 17;26(2):348-361. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210069.
2
Blastocyst versus cleavage transfers: who benefits?囊胚与卵裂期胚胎移植:谁受益?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Mar;305(3):749-756. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06224-2. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
3
Development of deep learning algorithms for predicting blastocyst formation and quality by time-lapse monitoring.
冻融双卵裂期或冻融第6天囊胚期单胚胎移植:对于未形成第5天囊胚的35岁以下患者,哪种更可取?
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 14;16:1473854. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1473854. eCollection 2025.
4
Cleavage-stage embryo segmentation using SAM-based dual branch pipeline: development and evaluation with the CleavageEmbryo dataset.基于SAM的双分支管道的卵裂期胚胎分割:使用CleavageEmbryo数据集进行开发和评估
Bioinformatics. 2025 Mar 29;41(4). doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae617.
5
Unraveling the mysteries of early embryonic arrest: genetic factors and molecular mechanisms.揭开早期胚胎停育的谜团:遗传因素与分子机制
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Dec;41(12):3301-3316. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03259-7. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
6
Which transfer day results in the highest live birth rate for PCOS patients undergoing in vitro fertilization?对于接受体外受精的多囊卵巢综合征患者,哪一天的转移能获得最高的活产率?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 16;23(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06173-5.
7
Prediction model for day 3 embryo implantation potential based on metabolites in spent embryo culture medium.基于胚胎培养液中代谢物预测第 3 天胚胎种植潜能的模型。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Jun 8;23(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05666-7.
8
Predicting the unexpected total fertilization failure in conventional fertilization cycles: What is the role of semen quality?预测常规受精周期中意外的完全受精失败:精液质量起什么作用?
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Feb 23;11:1133512. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1133512. eCollection 2023.
通过延时监测预测囊胚形成和质量的深度学习算法的开发。
Commun Biol. 2021 Mar 26;4(1):415. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-01937-1.
4
A machine learning system with reinforcement capacity for predicting the fate of an ART embryo.一种具有强化能力的机器学习系统,用于预测 ART 胚胎的命运。
Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2021 Feb;67(1):64-78. doi: 10.1080/19396368.2020.1822953.
5
Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus.生育技术及如何优化实验室性能以支持缩短健康单胎的分娩时间:德尔菲共识。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 May;38(5):1021-1043. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02077-5. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
GC-MS/MS analysis of metabolites derived from a single human blastocyst.对源自单个人类囊胚的代谢物进行气相色谱-串联质谱分析。
Metabolomics. 2021 Jan 25;17(2):17. doi: 10.1007/s11306-021-01770-x.
7
Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo with a good quality embryo benefit poor prognosis patients?将质量差的胚胎与质量好的胚胎进行转移,对预后较差的患者是否有益?
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2020 Sep 30;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12958-020-00656-2.
8
Time-lapse imaging: the state of the art†.延时成像:最新技术综述。
Biol Reprod. 2019 Dec 24;101(6):1146-1154. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioz035.
9
A comparison of morphokinetic markers predicting blastocyst formation and implantation potential from two large clinical data sets.比较来自两个大型临床数据集的形态动力学标记物,以预测囊胚形成和着床潜力。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Apr;36(4):637-646. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1396-x. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
10
Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinically assisted reproduction: a committee opinion.囊胚培养和移植在临床辅助生殖中的应用:委员会意见。
Fertil Steril. 2018 Dec;110(7):1246-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.09.011.