Institute of Psychology, Department of Experimental Clinical Psychology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
Institute of Psychology, Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 19;12(4):e056732. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056732.
Checking behaviour (CB) occurs in various mental health problems. Cognitive-behavioural models for these mental disorders share similar theoretical assumptions. Thus, they postulate a negative reinforcing effect of CB by reducing negative affect (ie, anxiety) and a maintenance of the pathology due to a lack of reality testing of concerns. This paper details methods for a systematic review that will be conducted to synthesise empirical evidence testing these theoretical assumptions across obsessive-compulsive, generalised anxiety, eating, body dysmorphic and illness anxiety disorder. The results are expected to foster our understanding of the mechanisms of action underlying CB, which is of high clinical relevance. Depending on whether or not the findings confirm the model assumptions regarding CB, the focus of treatments would need to be intensified or modified.
We will search PsycINFO, PubMed, PSYNDEX and Scopus for studies investigating the emotional state in which CB is being used as well as the immediate and longer-term effects of CB on cognitive and emotional measures in clinical and analogue samples. The selection process, data extraction and quality assessment of included studies will be performed by two independent reviewers. In the case of inconsistencies, a third reviewer will be involved. Study results will be reported in a narrative synthesis.
Ethics approval will not be required as this is a protocol for systematic review. The results are mainly disseminated through peer-reviewed publications.
CRD42021238835.
检查行为(CB)在各种心理健康问题中都有出现。这些精神障碍的认知行为模型具有相似的理论假设。因此,它们假设 CB 通过减轻负面情绪(即焦虑)产生负强化作用,并由于缺乏对关注的现实检验而维持病理状态。本文详细介绍了一项系统评价的方法,该评价将综合强迫症、广泛性焦虑症、饮食障碍、躯体变形障碍和疾病焦虑障碍等领域中检验这些理论假设的实证证据。预计这些结果将促进我们对 CB 作用机制的理解,这具有很高的临床意义。根据 CB 的发现是否证实了模型假设,治疗的重点需要加强或修改。
我们将在 PsycINFO、PubMed、PSYNDEX 和 Scopus 中搜索研究,这些研究调查了在何种情绪状态下使用 CB,以及 CB 对临床和模拟样本中认知和情绪测量的即时和长期影响。选择过程、数据提取和纳入研究的质量评估将由两名独立的审查员进行。如果存在不一致,将邀请第三名审查员参与。研究结果将以叙述性综合报告。
由于这是系统评价的方案,因此不需要伦理批准。结果主要通过同行评审的出版物传播。
PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42021238835。