• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估“开端计划”在认知和社会情感结果方面的异质处理效应。

Assessment of heterogeneous Head Start treatment effects on cognitive and social-emotional outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Division of Health Policy and Management, College of Health Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 19;12(1):6411. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10192-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-10192-1
PMID:35440710
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9018838/
Abstract

Head Start is a federally funded, nation-wide program in the U.S. for enhancing school readiness of children aged 3-5 from low-income families. Understanding heterogeneity in treatment effects (HTE) is an important task when evaluating programs, but most attempts to explore HTE in Head Start have been limited to subgroup analyses that rely on average treatment effects by subgroups. This study applies an extension of multilevel modelling, complex variance modelling, to data from a randomized controlled trial of Head Start, Head Start Impact Study (HSIS). The treatment effects on the variance, in addition to the mean, of nine cognitive and social-emotional outcomes were assessed for 4,442 children aged 3-4 years who were followed until their 3rd grade year. Head Start had positive short-term effects on the means of multiple cognitive outcomes while having no effect on the means of social-emotional outcomes. Head Start reduced the variances of multiple cognitive and one social-emotional outcomes, meaning that substantial HTE exists. In particular, the increased mean and decreased variance reflect the ability of Head Start to improve the outcomes and reduce their variability. Exploratory secondary analyses suggested that larger benefits for children with Spanish as a primary language and low parental educational level partly explained the reduced variability, but the HTE remained and the variability was reduced even within these subgroups. Routinely monitoring the treatment effects on the variance, in addition to the mean, would lead to a more comprehensive program evaluation that describes how a program performs on average and on the entire distribution.

摘要

“Head Start”是美国一个为来自低收入家庭的 3-5 岁儿童提供的、由联邦政府资助的全国性项目,旨在提高他们的入学准备水平。在评估项目时,了解处理效果的异质性(HTE)是一项重要任务,但大多数探索“Head Start”中 HTE 的尝试都仅限于基于子组的平均处理效果的子组分析。本研究应用了多层次建模、复杂方差建模的扩展,对“Head Start”的一项随机对照试验——“Head Start 影响研究(HSIS)”的数据进行了分析。对 4442 名 3-4 岁儿童的 9 项认知和社会情感结果的方差和均值进行了评估,这些儿童一直随访到他们的三年级。“Head Start”对多项认知结果的均值有短期的积极影响,而对社会情感结果的均值没有影响。“Head Start”降低了多项认知和一项社会情感结果的方差,这意味着存在大量的 HTE。特别是,均值的增加和方差的降低反映了“Head Start”提高了结果并降低了它们的可变性的能力。探索性的二次分析表明,对于以西班牙语为主要语言和父母教育程度较低的儿童来说,更大的收益在一定程度上解释了方差的降低,但 HTE 仍然存在,即使在这些子组内,方差也有所降低。常规监测处理效果的方差,除了均值,将导致更全面的项目评估,描述一个项目的平均表现和整个分布。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efc6/9018838/fc7dbd4b3fd9/41598_2022_10192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efc6/9018838/622547afa150/41598_2022_10192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efc6/9018838/fc7dbd4b3fd9/41598_2022_10192_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efc6/9018838/622547afa150/41598_2022_10192_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/efc6/9018838/fc7dbd4b3fd9/41598_2022_10192_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment of heterogeneous Head Start treatment effects on cognitive and social-emotional outcomes.评估“开端计划”在认知和社会情感结果方面的异质处理效应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 19;12(1):6411. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10192-1.
2
Treatment effect heterogeneity in the head start impact study: A systematic review of study characteristics and findings.“启智计划”影响研究中的治疗效果异质性:对研究特征与结果的系统评价
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep 8;16:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100916. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
The randomized controlled trial of Head Start REDI: Sustained effects on developmental trajectories of social-emotional functioning.“启智计划”增强社会情感发展干预(REDI)随机对照试验:对社会情感功能发展轨迹的持续影响
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;84(4):310-22. doi: 10.1037/a0039937. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
4
Promoting Children's Social-Emotional Skills in Preschool Can Enhance Academic and Behavioral Functioning in Kindergarten: Findings from Head Start REDI.在学前班培养儿童的社会情感技能可提升其在幼儿园的学业和行为表现:来自“领先计划”REDI的研究结果
Early Educ Dev. 2013;24(7). doi: 10.1080/10409289.2013.825565.
5
Associations between publicly funded preschool and low-income children's kindergarten readiness: The moderating role of child temperament.公共资助的学前教育与低收入儿童的幼儿园准备程度之间的关联:儿童气质的调节作用。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Mar;55(3):623-636. doi: 10.1037/dev0000651. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Executive functions and school readiness intervention: impact, moderation, and mediation in the Head Start REDI program.执行功能与入学准备干预:“启智计划REDI项目”中的影响、调节与中介作用
Dev Psychopathol. 2008 Summer;20(3):821-43. doi: 10.1017/S0954579408000394.
7
When does 1 + 1 not equal 2? The relative advantage of public school-based pre-k versus head start for low-income children's kindergarten cognitive and self-regulatory skills.1加1在什么时候不等于2?公立学校学前教育项目相对于“启智计划”对低收入儿童幼儿园认知和自我调节技能的相对优势。
Dev Psychol. 2022 May;58(5):848-865. doi: 10.1037/dev0001335.
8
Distributional effects on children's cognitive and social-emotional outcomes in the Head Start Impact Study: A quantile regression approach.《“启智计划”影响研究中对儿童认知和社会情感结果的分配效应:一种分位数回归方法》
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Apr 27;18:101108. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101108. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
Effectiveness of a Home- and School-Based Asthma Educational Program for Head Start Children With Asthma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.以哮喘为主的“起点计划”儿童家庭和学校哮喘教育计划的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2020 Dec 1;174(12):1191-1198. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.3375.
10
Long-term Head Start Impact on developmental outcomes for children in foster care.长期“先普启计划”对寄养儿童发展结果的影响。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Mar;101:104329. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104329. Epub 2020 Jan 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Understanding of the Roles of Gut-Brain Axis in the Cognitive Deficits Caused by Perinatal Stress Exposure.目前对围产期应激暴露引起认知缺陷中肠-脑轴作用的认识。
Cells. 2023 Jun 28;12(13):1735. doi: 10.3390/cells12131735.
2
Assessment of the predictive power of a causal variable: An application to the Head Start impact study.因果变量预测能力的评估:在“启智计划”影响研究中的应用。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Sep 6;19:101223. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101223. eCollection 2022 Sep.
3
Distributional effects on children's cognitive and social-emotional outcomes in the Head Start Impact Study: A quantile regression approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment effect heterogeneity in the head start impact study: A systematic review of study characteristics and findings.“启智计划”影响研究中的治疗效果异质性:对研究特征与结果的系统评价
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Sep 8;16:100916. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100916. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
The "average" treatment effect: A construct ripe for retirement. A commentary on Deaton and Cartwright.“平均”治疗效果:一个亟待淘汰的概念。对迪顿和卡特赖特的评论
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Aug;210:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.04.027. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
3
Patterning of individual heterogeneity in body mass index: evidence from 57 low- and middle-income countries.
《“启智计划”影响研究中对儿童认知和社会情感结果的分配效应:一种分位数回归方法》
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Apr 27;18:101108. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101108. eCollection 2022 Jun.
个体体重指数异质性的模式:来自 57 个低收入和中等收入国家的证据。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Aug;33(8):741-750. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0355-2. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
The tyranny of the averages and the indiscriminate use of risk factors in public health: The case of coronary heart disease.公共卫生领域中平均值的暴政以及风险因素的滥用:以冠心病为例。
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Aug 18;3:684-698. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.08.005. eCollection 2017 Dec.
5
A multilevel approach to modeling health inequalities at the intersection of multiple social identities.一种多层次方法,用于建模多个社会身份交叉处的健康不平等现象。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Apr;203:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
6
Parental Book Reading and Social-Emotional Outcomes for Head Start Children in Foster Care.寄养环境下头启计划儿童的家长读书情况与社会情感发展结果
Soc Work Public Health. 2016 Aug-Sep;31(5):408-18. doi: 10.1080/19371918.2015.1137523. Epub 2016 May 11.
7
Head Start's impact is contingent on alternative type of care in comparison group.启蒙计划的影响取决于对照组中替代类型的照料。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Dec;50(12):2572-86. doi: 10.1037/a0038205. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
8
Who benefits most from Head Start? Using latent class moderation to examine differential treatment effects.谁从启蒙计划中受益最大?运用潜在类别调节来检验差异治疗效果。
Child Dev. 2014 Nov-Dec;85(6):2317-38. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12278. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
9
Do the effects of head start vary by parental preacademic stimulation?“启智计划”的效果会因父母学前教育刺激的不同而有所差异吗?
Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1385-400. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12233. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
10
A new typology of policies to tackle health inequalities and scenarios of impact based on Rose's population approach.一种新的政策分类方法,旨在解决健康不平等问题,并根据罗斯的人口方法评估影响情景。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Mar;67(3):286-91. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200363. Epub 2012 Aug 17.