• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Electronic clinical quality measure reporting challenges: findings from the Medicare EHR Incentive Program's Controlling High Blood Pressure Measure.电子临床质量衡量报告挑战:来自医疗保险电子健康记录激励计划控制高血压衡量标准的发现。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):127-134. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx049.
2
Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.初级保健实践在 EvidenceNOW 西南倡议中报告电子临床质量指标以改善心脏健康的能力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569.
3
Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医师费率表下的基于绩效的激励支付系统(MIPS)和替代支付模式(APM)激励措施,以及以医师为重点的支付模式标准。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 4;81(214):77008-831.
4
Physician Quality Reporting System.医师质量报告系统。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Dec;32(11):2000-1. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2912. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
5
6
Merit-Based Incentive Payment System: Meaningful Changes in the Final Rule Brings Cautious Optimism.基于绩效的激励支付系统:最终规则的重大变化带来谨慎乐观情绪。
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E1-E12.
7
Medicare Program: Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems and Quality Reporting Programs; Organ Procurement Organization Reporting and Communication; Transplant Outcome Measures and Documentation Requirements; Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs; Payment to Nonexcepted Off-Campus Provider-Based Department of a Hospital; Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program; Establishment of Payment Rates Under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule for Nonexcepted Items and Services Furnished by an Off-Campus Provider-Based Department of a Hospital. Final rule with comment period and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划:医院门诊前瞻性支付和门诊手术中心支付系统及质量报告计划;器官采购组织报告与沟通;移植结果衡量与文件要求;电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划;向医院非豁免校外基于提供者的科室付款;医院基于价值的采购(VBP)计划;确定医疗保险医师费率表下医院校外基于提供者的科室提供的非豁免项目和服务的支付费率。带有意见征求期的最终规则和带有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 14;81(219):79562-892.
8
Financial Incentives and Physician Practice Participation in Medicare's Value-Based Reforms.医疗保险基于价值的改革中经济激励与医生执业参与度。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3052-3069. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12743. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
9
Growth Of New York Physician Participation In Meaningful Use Of Electronic Health Records Was Variable, 2011-12.纽约医生参与电子健康记录的使用在 2011-2012 年有所不同。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jun;34(6):1035-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1189.
10
Generating and Reporting Electronic Clinical Quality Measures from Electronic Health Records: Strategies from EvidenceNOW Cooperatives.从电子健康记录中生成和报告电子临床质量指标:来自“证据现在”合作组织的策略
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):485-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748145. Epub 2022 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Generating and Reporting Electronic Clinical Quality Measures from Electronic Health Records: Strategies from EvidenceNOW Cooperatives.从电子健康记录中生成和报告电子临床质量指标:来自“证据现在”合作组织的策略
Appl Clin Inform. 2022 Mar;13(2):485-494. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748145. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Observing Provider Utilization of Electronic Health Records to Improve Clinical Quality Metrics.观察医疗服务提供者对电子健康记录的使用情况,以改善临床质量指标。
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1o. eCollection 2022 Winter.
3
Practice and market factors associated with provider volume of health information exchange.与健康信息交换提供者数量相关的实践和市场因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1451-1460. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab024.
4
Challenges to electronic clinical quality measurement using third-party platforms in primary care practices: the healthy hearts in the heartland experience.基层医疗实践中使用第三方平台进行电子临床质量测量面临的挑战:美国中西部地区“健康心脏”项目的经验
JAMIA Open. 2019 Sep 20;2(4):423-428. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz038. eCollection 2019 Dec.
5
Primary Care Practices' Ability to Report Electronic Clinical Quality Measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.初级保健实践在 EvidenceNOW 西南倡议中报告电子临床质量指标以改善心脏健康的能力。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569.
6
Using Clinical Data Standards to Measure Quality: A New Approach.利用临床数据标准衡量质量:一种新方法。
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Apr;9(2):422-431. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1656548. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Physician and Practice-Level Drivers and Disparities around Meaningful Use Progress.医生及医疗机构层面围绕有意义使用进展的驱动因素与差异
Health Serv Res. 2017 Feb;52(1):244-267. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12481. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
2
Variation In Rural Health Information Technology Adoption And Use.农村医疗卫生信息技术采用与使用情况的差异
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Feb;35(2):365-70. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0861. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
3
Using electronic clinical quality measure reporting for public health surveillance.利用电子临床质量指标报告进行公共卫生监测。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015 May 1;64(16):439-42.
4
Patients with undiagnosed hypertension: hiding in plain sight.未确诊高血压患者:隐匿于众目睽睽之下。
JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1973-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15388.
5
Progress of health plans toward meeting the million hearts clinical target for high blood pressure control - United States, 2010-2012.卫生计划在实现“百万心脏”高血压控制临床目标方面的进展-美国,2010-2012 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 Feb 14;63(6):127-30.
6
Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012.美国成年人高血压情况:2011 - 2012年国家健康与营养检查调查
NCHS Data Brief. 2013 Oct(133):1-8.
7
Effect of pay-for-performance incentives on quality of care in small practices with electronic health records: a randomized trial.基于电子病历的小型医疗实践中按绩效付费激励对医疗质量的影响:一项随机试验。
JAMA. 2013 Sep 11;310(10):1051-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.277353.
8
Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care.实践规模是否重要?对初级保健中医疗质量影响的综述。
Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Sep;63(614):e604-10. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X671588.
9
Medicare and Medicaid programs; electronic health record incentive program--stage 2. Final rule.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;电子健康记录激励计划——第二阶段。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2012 Sep 4;77(171):53967-4162.
10
Million hearts--where population health and clinical practice intersect.“百万心脏”——人口健康与临床实践的交汇点。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 1;5(4):589-91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966978.

电子临床质量衡量报告挑战:来自医疗保险电子健康记录激励计划控制高血压衡量标准的发现。

Electronic clinical quality measure reporting challenges: findings from the Medicare EHR Incentive Program's Controlling High Blood Pressure Measure.

机构信息

MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA, USA.

Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 1;25(2):127-134. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx049.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocx049
PMID:28525558
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7647130/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify physician and practice characteristics associated with high clinical and technical performance on the electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) that calculates the proportion of patients with hypertension who have controlled blood pressure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 268 602 physicians participating in the Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program between 2011 and 2014. Independent variables included delivery reform participation and physician, practice level, and area characteristics. Successful technical performance was a reported eCQM with non-zero values in both the numerator and denominator. Successful clinical performance was a reported eCQM value of ≥70% hypertension control.

RESULTS

Physicians with longer experience using certified health information technology, participants in delivery reform programs, and specialists that traditionally manage hypertension were 5%-15% more likely to achieve 70% control. Physicians in smaller and rural practices and a subset of physicians unlikely to primarily manage hypertension were more likely to submit measures with a zero value in either the numerator or denominator.

DISCUSSION

More physicians are using eCQMs to track and report their quality improvement efforts. This research presents the first examination of national eCQM data to identify physician and practice-level characteristics associated with performance.

CONCLUSION

With careful selection of measures relevant to the clinician's specialty, complete data entry, and support for continuous quality improvement, health care professionals can excel technically and clinically. As care delivery transitions from fee-for-service to quality- and value-based models, high performers may realize financial gains and better patient outcomes. These analyses suggest patterns that may inform steps to improve performance.

摘要

目的

确定与电子临床质量衡量标准(eCQM)的临床和技术表现相关的医生和实践特征,该标准用于计算高血压患者中血压得到控制的比例。

材料和方法

本研究纳入了 2011 年至 2014 年间参与医疗保险电子健康记录激励计划的 268602 名医生。自变量包括参与交付改革和医生、实践水平和地区特征。成功的技术表现是报告的 eCQM,分子和分母均有非零值。成功的临床表现是报告的 eCQM 值≥70%的高血压控制率。

结果

使用经认证的健康信息技术经验更丰富、参与交付改革计划的医生以及传统上管理高血压的专家,达到 70%控制率的可能性增加 5%-15%。较小规模和农村实践中的医生以及不太可能主要管理高血压的医生中,更有可能在分子或分母中提交零值的措施。

讨论

越来越多的医生正在使用 eCQM 来跟踪和报告他们的质量改进工作。本研究首次对全国 eCQM 数据进行了检查,以确定与绩效相关的医生和实践水平特征。

结论

通过精心选择与临床医生专业相关的措施、完整的数据录入以及对持续质量改进的支持,医疗保健专业人员可以在技术和临床方面表现出色。随着医疗保健服务从按服务收费模式向质量和价值为基础的模式转变,高绩效者可能会获得经济收益和更好的患者结果。这些分析表明了可能有助于提高绩效的模式。