Suppr超能文献

老年人脆弱性及其在英国的分布。

Frailty among Older Adults and Its Distribution in England.

机构信息

David R Sinclair, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE4 5PL, UK, Email address:

出版信息

J Frailty Aging. 2022;11(2):163-168. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2021.55.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information on the spatial distribution of the frail population is crucial to inform service planning in health and social care.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate small-area frailty prevalence among older adults using survey data. To assess whether prevalence differs between urban, rural, coastal and inland areas of England.

DESIGN

Using data from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), ordinal logistic regression was used to predict the probability of frailty, according to age, sex and area deprivation. Probabilities were applied to demographic and economic information in 2020 population projections to estimate the district-level prevalence of frailty.

RESULTS

The prevalence of frailty in adults aged 50+ (2020) in England was estimated to be 8.1 [95% CI 7.3-8.8]%. We found substantial geographic variation, with the prevalence of frailty varying by a factor of 4.0 [3.5-4.4] between the most and least frail areas. A higher prevalence of frailty was found for urban than rural areas, and coastal than inland areas. There are widespread geographic inequalities in healthy ageing in England, with older people in urban and coastal areas disproportionately frail relative to those in rural and inland areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions aimed at reducing inequalities in healthy ageing should be targeted at urban and coastal areas, where the greatest benefit may be achieved.

摘要

背景

了解脆弱人群的空间分布情况对于医疗和社会保健服务规划至关重要。

目的

使用调查数据估算英格兰老年人的小区域脆弱性流行率。评估脆弱性在英格兰城市、农村、沿海和内陆地区之间是否存在差异。

设计

利用英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的数据,根据年龄、性别和地区贫困程度,采用有序逻辑回归预测脆弱性的概率。将概率应用于 2020 年人口预测中的人口和经济信息,以估算地区一级的脆弱性流行率。

结果

英格兰 50 岁及以上成年人(2020 年)的脆弱性流行率估计为 8.1%[95%置信区间 7.3-8.8%]。我们发现存在显著的地理差异,最脆弱和最不易脆弱地区之间的脆弱性流行率差异高达 4.0 倍[3.5-4.4]。城市地区的脆弱性患病率高于农村地区,沿海地区高于内陆地区。英格兰在健康老龄化方面存在广泛的地理不平等,城市和沿海地区的老年人相对于农村和内陆地区的老年人脆弱性不成比例。

结论

旨在减少健康老龄化不平等的干预措施应针对城市和沿海地区,这些地区可能会取得最大的成效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验