Department of Cardiology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 1 Dongdan Dahua Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Health Service Department of the Guard Bureau of the Joint Staff Department, Beijing, China.
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 1;23(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04241-1.
Social frailty has not been comprehensively studied in China. Our objective is to investigate the prevalence of social frailty among the older population in China, as well as identify relevant factors and urban-rural differences.
We obtained data from the Fourth Sample Survey of the Aged Population in Urban and Rural China (SSAPUR) database. The study employed a multistage, stratified, cluster-sampling method, recruiting a total of 224,142 adults aged 60 years or older. Participants were interviewed to gather demographic data and information on family, health and medical conditions, health care service status, living environment conditions, social participation, protected rights status, spiritual and cultural life, and health. Social frailty was assessed using the HALFE Social Frailty Index. A score of three or above indicated social frailty.
We analyzed a total of 222,179 cases, and the overall prevalence of social frailty was found to be 15.2%. The highest prevalence was observed among participants aged 75-79 years (18.0%). The prevalence of social frailty was higher in rural older populations compared to urban older populations (19.9% in rural vs. 10.9% in urban, P < 0.0001). In urban areas, women had a higher prevalence than men (11.7% in women vs. 9.9% in men, P < 0.0001), while in rural areas, men had a higher prevalence than women (20.6% in men vs. 19.2% in women, P < 0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that living in a rural/urban environment (OR 1.789, 95% CI 1.742-1.837), absence of a spouse/spousal presence (OR 4.874, 95% CI 4.743-5.009), self-assessed unhealthy/health status (OR 1.696, 95% CI 1.633-1.761), and housing dissatisfaction/satisfaction (OR 2.303, 95% CI 2.233-2.376) were all significantly associated with social frailty.
Using the HALFE social frailty index, we found a prevalence of 15.2% among older people in China, with the highest prevalence observed in the 75-79 age group. Social frailty was more prevalent in rural areas than in urban areas. Various factors, including spousal presence, housing satisfaction, health status, and urban-rural residential differences, were significantly associated with social frailty. These findings highlight the modifiable and non-modifiable factors that contribute to social frailty among older individuals in China.
在中国,社会脆弱性尚未得到全面研究。我们的目的是调查中国老年人群体中社会脆弱性的流行情况,并确定相关因素和城乡差异。
我们从中国城乡老年人第四次抽样调查(SSAPUR)数据库中获取数据。该研究采用多阶段、分层、聚类抽样方法,共招募了 224142 名 60 岁及以上的成年人。通过访谈收集参与者的人口统计学数据以及家庭、健康和医疗状况、医疗服务状况、生活环境条件、社会参与、受保护权利状况、精神文化生活和健康信息。使用 HALFE 社会脆弱性指数评估社会脆弱性。得分为三或以上表示社会脆弱。
我们共分析了 222179 例,总体社会脆弱性患病率为 15.2%。在 75-79 岁的参与者中观察到最高的患病率(18.0%)。农村老年人的社会脆弱性患病率高于城市老年人(农村 19.9%,城市 10.9%,P<0.0001)。在城市地区,女性的患病率高于男性(女性 11.7%,男性 9.9%,P<0.0001),而在农村地区,男性的患病率高于女性(男性 20.6%,女性 19.2%,P<0.0001)。多变量回归分析显示,居住在农村/城市环境中(OR 1.789,95%CI 1.742-1.837)、无配偶/有配偶(OR 4.874,95%CI 4.743-5.009)、自评不健康/健康状况(OR 1.696,95%CI 1.633-1.761)和住房不满意/满意(OR 2.303,95%CI 2.233-2.376)均与社会脆弱性显著相关。
使用 HALFE 社会脆弱性指数,我们发现中国老年人的患病率为 15.2%,75-79 岁年龄组的患病率最高。农村地区的社会脆弱性患病率高于城市地区。配偶存在、住房满意度、健康状况和城乡居住差异等各种因素与社会脆弱性显著相关。这些发现突出了导致中国老年人群体社会脆弱性的可改变和不可改变因素。