• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异性恋大学男性中的自恋、同理心与对强奸谬论的认同

Narcissism, Empathy, and Rape Myth Acceptance Among Heterosexual College Males.

作者信息

Long Alexandra D, Herr Nathaniel R

机构信息

Department of Psychology, American University, Asbury 139, 4400 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, D.C., 20016, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jul;51(5):2373-2383. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02256-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1007/s10508-021-02256-6
PMID:35441334
Abstract

The perpetration of rape and sexual assault on college campuses is a pervasive problem that has been linked to narcissism and rape myth acceptance. Studies evaluating empathy priming-based prevention programs have yielded mixed results, and empathy priming has not been examined specifically among high-risk populations. The present study sought to address this gap in the literature by exploring how empathy priming interacts with narcissistic traits to predict heterosexual college males' (n = 74) rape myth acceptance. Participants read a vignette depicting a date rape and were either primed to be empathetic or objective. Results showed that baseline empathy and narcissism were negatively and positively associated with rape myth acceptance, respectively. After priming, participants low on narcissistic traits had lower rape myth acceptance when they were in the empathy (vs. the objective) condition, whereas individuals high in narcissistic traits had higher rape myth acceptance when they were in the empathy priming condition. Findings suggest that males who were at higher risk of perpetration more strongly endorsed problematic beliefs about rape after being asked to empathize with a fictional rape victim. Future prevention and intervention studies should incorporate measures of personality traits and continue to explore the possibility that empathy priming may produce the opposite of the intended effect among high-risk males.

摘要

大学校园里的强奸和性侵犯行为是一个普遍存在的问题,这与自恋和对强奸谬论的认同有关。评估基于共情启动的预防项目的研究结果不一,而且尚未专门在高危人群中研究共情启动。本研究旨在通过探讨共情启动如何与自恋特质相互作用,以预测异性恋大学男性(n = 74)对强奸谬论的认同,来填补这一文献空白。参与者阅读了一篇描述约会强奸的短文,并被启动为具有共情或客观的状态。结果显示,基线共情和自恋分别与对强奸谬论的认同呈负相关和正相关。启动后,自恋特质较低的参与者在共情(相对于客观)状态下对强奸谬论的认同较低,而自恋特质较高的个体在共情启动状态下对强奸谬论的认同较高。研究结果表明,实施犯罪风险较高的男性在被要求对虚构的强奸受害者产生共情后,更强烈地认同关于强奸的问题信念。未来的预防和干预研究应纳入人格特质的测量,并继续探索共情启动可能在高危男性中产生与预期效果相反的结果的可能性。

相似文献

1
Narcissism, Empathy, and Rape Myth Acceptance Among Heterosexual College Males.异性恋大学男性中的自恋、同理心与对强奸谬论的认同
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jul;51(5):2373-2383. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02256-6. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Alcohol Use, Rape Myth Acceptance, Rape Empathy, and Sexual Assault History Influence the Believability of a Hypothetical Victim's Report of Sexual Assault.饮酒、强奸谬论接受度、强奸共情和性侵犯史会影响对虚构受害者性侵报告的可信度判断。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Dec;38(23-24):12046-12066. doi: 10.1177/08862605231190345. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
The Interaction Between Observer Sex and Sexual Identity on Attributions of Blame With a Heterosexual Female Victim.观察者性别与性身份认同对异性女性受害者归咎的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):NP527-NP554. doi: 10.1177/0886260517733281. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
4
Empathy Is Not Enough: The Inhibiting Effects of Rape Myth Acceptance on the Relation Between Empathy and Bystander Intervention.同理心还不够:强奸谬论接受对同理心与旁观者干预关系的抑制作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Dec;36(23-24):11532-11552. doi: 10.1177/0886260519900328. Epub 2020 Jan 15.
5
Rape Myth Acceptance and Other Barriers to Formally Reporting Sexual Assault Among College Students With and Without Sexual Assault Histories.有无性侵犯史的大学生对强奸谬见的认同及正式报告性侵犯的其他障碍
J Interpers Violence. 2023 May;38(9-10):6773-6797. doi: 10.1177/08862605221137703. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
6
Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States.性侵犯支持态度:美国两所大学的希腊裔和非希腊裔大学生中的强奸谬论接受和象征性抵制。
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Nov;33(22):3502-3530. doi: 10.1177/0886260516636064. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
7
Rape myth acceptance among students attending a historically black college (HBCU): implications for intervention design.就读于历史悠久的黑人大学(HBCU)的学生对强奸谬见的认同:对干预设计的启示
J Am Coll Health. 2023 Feb-Mar;71(2):528-534. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1898402. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
8
Dispelling a Myth: Reevaluating the Predictive Validity of Rape Myth Acceptance for Likelihood of Engaging in Sexual Violence.破除神话:重新评估强奸观念接受度对性暴力行为可能性的预测有效性。
Sex Abuse. 2022 Jun;34(4):398-424. doi: 10.1177/10790632211026287. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
9
Exploring the Impact of Informal Rape Myth Education in a Nonstudent Sample.在非学生样本中探究非正式强奸谬见教育的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Feb;37(3-4):NP1298-NP1321. doi: 10.1177/0886260520927496. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
10
Rape Myth Acceptance, Efficacy, and Heterosexual Scripts in Men's Magazines: Factors Associated With Intentions to Sexually Coerce or Intervene.强奸谬论接受度、效能及男性杂志中的异性恋脚本:与性胁迫或干预意图相关的因素。
J Interpers Violence. 2019 Apr;34(8):1703-1733. doi: 10.1177/0886260516653752. Epub 2016 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental study of factors influencing observers' perceptions and reactions to sexual harassment in Chinese university students.影响中国大学生观察者对性骚扰认知与反应因素的实验研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1525006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1525006. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Personality and Perpetration: Narcissism Among College Sexual Assault Perpetrators.人格与犯罪行为:大学性侵犯罪者中的自恋现象
Violence Against Women. 2016 Sep;22(10):1228-42. doi: 10.1177/1077801215622575. Epub 2015 Dec 27.
2
Cross-Sectional Predictors of Sexual Assault Perpetration in a Community Sample of Single African American and Caucasian Men.单一非裔美国男性和白人男性社区样本中性侵犯犯罪的横断面预测因素
Aggress Behav. 2006 Feb;32(1):54-67. doi: 10.1002/ab.20107. Epub 2005 Oct 3.
3
A dangerous boomerang: Injunctive norms, hostile sexist attitudes, and male-to-female sexual aggression.
一个危险的“飞去来器”:禁令规范、敌意性性别态度与男性对女性的性侵犯
Aggress Behav. 2015 Nov-Dec;41(6):580-93. doi: 10.1002/ab.21597. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
4
Narcissistic personality disorder: diagnostic and clinical challenges.自恋型人格障碍:诊断与临床挑战
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 May;172(5):415-22. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14060723.
5
Exploring the automatic undercurrents of sexual narcissism: individual differences in the sex-aggression link.探索性自恋的自动暗流:性行为与侵犯之间关联的个体差异。
Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Aug;42(6):1033-41. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-0065-x. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
6
A systematic qualitative review of risk and protective factors for sexual violence perpetration.性暴力犯罪的风险和保护因素的系统定性综述。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2013 Apr;14(2):133-67. doi: 10.1177/1524838012470031. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
7
The five-factor narcissism inventory: a five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits.五因素自恋人格量表:一种五因素测量自恋人格特质的工具。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):500-12. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.670680. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Alcohol's role in sexual violence perpetration: theoretical explanations, existing evidence and future directions.酒精在性暴力犯罪中的作用:理论解释、现有证据和未来方向。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 Sep;30(5):481-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00296.x.
9
Lack of empathy in patients with narcissistic personality disorder.自恋型人格障碍患者缺乏同理心。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 May 15;187(1-2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.09.013. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
10
On the meaning and measure of narcissism.论自恋的意义与度量
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jul;35(7):951-64. doi: 10.1177/0146167209335461.