• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和验证预测模型,以预测安全网医院人群中的 COVID-19 结局。

Development and validation of predictive models for COVID-19 outcomes in a safety-net hospital population.

机构信息

Center for Information and Systems Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1253-1262. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac062.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocac062
PMID:35441692
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9129120/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop predictive models of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes, elucidate the influence of socioeconomic factors, and assess algorithmic racial fairness using a racially diverse patient population with high social needs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data included 7,102 patients with positive (RT-PCR) severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 test at a safety-net system in Massachusetts. Linear and nonlinear classification methods were applied. A score based on a recurrent neural network and a transformer architecture was developed to capture the dynamic evolution of vital signs. Combined with patient characteristics, clinical variables, and hospital occupancy measures, this dynamic vital score was used to train predictive models.

RESULTS

Hospitalizations can be predicted with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 92% using symptoms, hospital occupancy, and patient characteristics, including social determinants of health. Parsimonious models to predict intensive care, mechanical ventilation, and mortality that used the most recent labs and vitals exhibited AUCs of 92.7%, 91.2%, and 94%, respectively. Early predictive models, using labs and vital signs closer to admission had AUCs of 81.1%, 84.9%, and 92%, respectively.

DISCUSSION

The most accurate models exhibit racial bias, being more likely to falsely predict that Black patients will be hospitalized. Models that are only based on the dynamic vital score exhibited accuracies close to the best parsimonious models, although the latter also used laboratories.

CONCLUSIONS

This large study demonstrates that COVID-19 severity may accurately be predicted using a score that accounts for the dynamic evolution of vital signs. Further, race, social determinants of health, and hospital occupancy play an important role.

摘要

目的

开发针对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)结局的预测模型,阐明社会经济因素的影响,并使用具有高社会需求的种族多样化患者群体评估算法的种族公平性。

材料与方法

数据包括马萨诸塞州一个医疗保障系统中 7102 例经聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测呈阳性的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 检测的患者。采用线性和非线性分类方法。基于递归神经网络和变压器架构开发了一个评分系统,以捕捉生命体征的动态演变。该动态生命评分与患者特征、临床变量和医院占用率指标相结合,用于训练预测模型。

结果

使用症状、医院占用率和患者特征(包括健康的社会决定因素),可以预测住院情况,其受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为 92%。使用最近的实验室和生命体征来预测重症监护、机械通气和死亡率的简约模型,其 AUC 分别为 92.7%、91.2%和 94%。使用更接近入院时的实验室和生命体征的早期预测模型,其 AUC 分别为 81.1%、84.9%和 92%。

讨论

最准确的模型表现出种族偏见,更有可能错误地预测黑人患者将住院。仅基于动态生命体征的模型的准确性接近最佳简约模型,尽管后者也使用实验室。

结论

这项大型研究表明,使用考虑生命体征动态演变的评分可以准确预测 COVID-19 的严重程度。此外,种族、健康的社会决定因素和医院占用率起着重要作用。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of predictive models for COVID-19 outcomes in a safety-net hospital population.开发和验证预测模型,以预测安全网医院人群中的 COVID-19 结局。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1253-1262. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac062.
2
Development of Severe COVID-19 Adaptive Risk Predictor (SCARP), a Calculator to Predict Severe Disease or Death in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.严重 COVID-19 适应性风险预测器(SCARP)的开发,是一种用于预测 COVID-19 住院患者发生严重疾病或死亡的计算器。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Jun;174(6):777-785. doi: 10.7326/M20-6754. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
3
Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score to Predict the Occurrence of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.开发和验证一种临床风险评分,以预测 COVID-19 住院患者发生危重症的情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Aug 1;180(8):1081-1089. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2033.
4
A GPT-based EHR modeling system for unsupervised novel disease detection.基于 GPT 的电子健康记录建模系统,用于无监督的新型疾病检测。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104706. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104706. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
5
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
6
The Development and Validation of Simplified Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Prognosis of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: Multicenter, Retrospective Study.中文译文:简化机器学习算法预测 COVID-19 住院患者预后的开发和验证:多中心回顾性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 21;24(1):e31549. doi: 10.2196/31549.
7
How Do Presenting Symptoms and Outcomes Differ by Race/Ethnicity Among Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection? Experience in Massachusetts.在因感染 2019 冠状病毒病而住院的患者中,不同种族/族裔的临床表现和结局有何不同?马萨诸塞州的经验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e4131-e4138. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1245.
8
A Clinical Risk Score to Predict In-hospital Mortality from COVID-19 in South Korea.韩国用于预测 COVID-19 住院患者死亡率的临床风险评分
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Apr 19;36(15):e108. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e108.
9
Laboratory Findings Associated With Severe Illness and Mortality Among Hospitalized Individuals With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Eastern Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州东部住院的 2019 年冠状病毒病患者中严重疾病和死亡相关的实验室检查结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2023934. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23934.
10
Simple demographic characteristics and laboratory findings on admission may predict in-hospital mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection: development and validation of the covid-19 score.简单的人口统计学特征和入院时的实验室检查结果可能预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的住院死亡率:covid-19 评分的制定和验证。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):945. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06645-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in triage of COVID-19 patients.人工智能在新冠病毒疾病患者的分诊中的应用
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Dec 18;7:1495074. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1495074. eCollection 2024.
2
A GPT-based EHR modeling system for unsupervised novel disease detection.基于 GPT 的电子健康记录建模系统,用于无监督的新型疾病检测。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104706. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104706. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
Racial Differences in Accuracy of Predictive Models for High-Flow Nasal Cannula Failure in COVID-19.种族差异对 COVID-19 高流量鼻导管失败预测模型准确性的影响。
Crit Care Explor. 2024 Mar 12;6(3):e1059. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000001059. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
ITNR: Inversion Transformer-based Neural Ranking for cancer drug recommendations.基于反转 Transformer 的神经排序在癌症药物推荐中的应用。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Apr;172:108312. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108312. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
Deep learning in public health: Comparative predictive models for COVID-19 case forecasting.深度学习在公共卫生领域的应用:用于 COVID-19 病例预测的比较预测模型。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 14;19(3):e0294289. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294289. eCollection 2024.
6
Toward standardization, harmonization, and integration of social determinants of health data: A Texas Clinical and Translational Science Award institutions collaboration.迈向健康数据社会决定因素的标准化、协调化与整合:德克萨斯临床与转化科学奖机构合作项目
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jan 9;8(1):e17. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.2. eCollection 2024.
7
In-hospital real-time prediction of COVID-19 severity regardless of disease phase using electronic health records.使用电子健康记录对COVID-19严重程度进行院内实时预测,无论疾病处于何阶段。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 25;19(1):e0294362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294362. eCollection 2024.
8
Transformative Potential of AI in Healthcare: Definitions, Applications, and Navigating the Ethical Landscape and Public Perspectives.人工智能在医疗保健领域的变革潜力:定义、应用以及应对伦理格局和公众观点
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 5;12(2):125. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020125.
9
Prognostic models in COVID-19 infection that predict severity: a systematic review.COVID-19 感染中预测严重程度的预后模型:系统评价。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2023 Apr;38(4):355-372. doi: 10.1007/s10654-023-00973-x. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
10
Social determinants of health and the prediction of missed breast imaging appointments.健康的社会决定因素与乳腺影像学检查预约失约的预测。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 30;22(1):1454. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08784-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality and Clinical Outcomes among Patients with COVID-19 and Diabetes.COVID-19 合并糖尿病患者的死亡率和临床结局。
Med Sci (Basel). 2021 Oct 26;9(4):65. doi: 10.3390/medsci9040065.
2
Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Between Urban and Rural Counties - United States, December 14, 2020-April 10, 2021.城乡地区 COVID-19 疫苗接种覆盖率差距 - 美国,2020 年 12 月 14 日-2021 年 4 月 10 日。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 May 21;70(20):759-764. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7020e3.
3
COVID-19 Automatic Diagnosis With Radiographic Imaging: Explainable Attention Transfer Deep Neural Networks.COVID-19 自动诊断的放射影像学:可解释的注意力转移深度神经网络。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Jul;25(7):2376-2387. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3074893. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
4
Development and validation of prediction models for mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and readmission in COVID-19 patients.开发和验证 COVID-19 患者机械通气、肾脏替代治疗和再入院的预测模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1480-1488. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab029.
5
Variation in racial/ethnic disparities in COVID-19 mortality by age in the United States: A cross-sectional study.美国 COVID-19 死亡率的种族/民族差异随年龄变化的情况:一项横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 20;17(10):e1003402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003402. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Physiological and socioeconomic characteristics predict COVID-19 mortality and resource utilization in Brazil.生理和社会经济特征可预测巴西 COVID-19 死亡率和资源利用情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0240346. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240346. eCollection 2020.
7
Early prediction of level-of-care requirements in patients with COVID-19.对 COVID-19 患者的医疗照护需求进行早期预测。
Elife. 2020 Oct 12;9:e60519. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60519.
8
Racism, Not Race, Drives Inequity Across the COVID-19 Continuum.种族主义,而非种族,导致了新冠疫情全过程中的不平等现象。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2019933. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19933.
9
Lactate dehydrogenase levels predict coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and mortality: A pooled analysis.乳酸脱氢酶水平可预测 2019 冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的严重程度和死亡率:一项汇总分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;38(9):1722-1726. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.05.073. Epub 2020 May 27.
10
C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, D-dimer, and ferritin in severe coronavirus disease-2019: a meta-analysis.C 反应蛋白、降钙素原、D-二聚体和铁蛋白在严重 2019 冠状病毒病中的meta 分析。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020 Jan-Dec;14:1753466620937175. doi: 10.1177/1753466620937175.