ICS & Sociology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pedagogy & Educational Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Child Dev. 2022 Sep;93(5):1458-1474. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13772. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Existing literature has mostly explained the occurrence of bullying victimization by individual socioemotional maladjustment. Instead, this study tested the person-group dissimilarity model (Wright et al., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50: 523-536, 1986) by examining whether individuals' deviation from developmentally important (relational, socio-behavioral, and physical) descriptive classroom norms predicted victimization. Adolescents (N = 1267, k = 56 classrooms; M = 13.2; 48.7% boys; 83.4% Dutch) provided self-reported and peer-nomination data throughout one school year (three timepoints). Results from group actor-partner interdependence models indicated that more person-group dissimilarity in relational characteristics (fewer friendships; incidence rate ratios [IRR] = 0.28, IRR = 0.16, fewer social media connections; IRR = 0.13) and, particularly, lower disruptive behaviors (IRR = 0.35, IRR = 0.26) predicted victimization throughout the school year.
现有文献主要解释了个体社会情感失调导致受欺凌现象发生的原因。相比之下,本研究通过检验个体-群体差异模型(Wright 等人,《人格与社会心理学杂志》,50:523-536, 1986),研究了个体在发展中重要的(关系、社会行为和身体)描述性课堂规范上的偏差是否会预测其成为欺凌受害者。本研究的数据来源于 1267 名青少年(k=56 个班级,M=13.2,48.7%为男生,83.4%为荷兰人),他们在一学年内(三个时间点)提供了自我报告和同伴提名数据。群体 Actor-Partner 互依模型的结果表明,在人际关系特征方面(友谊较少,IRR=0.28;社交软件连接较少,IRR=0.13),特别是在行为干扰方面(IRR=0.35;IRR=0.26)的个体-群体差异越大,整个学年中受欺凌的可能性就越高。