• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

电子通讯在医学研究中使用的伦理框架和实用指南

Framework and Practical Guidance for the Ethical Use of Electronic Methods for Communication With Participants in Medical Research.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Ethics and Public Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e33167. doi: 10.2196/33167.

DOI:10.2196/33167
PMID:35442208
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9069285/
Abstract

Online communication with participants, including online recruitment, electronic informed consent, and data communication, is one of the fields to which information and communication technology (ICT) has been applied in medical research. Online communication provides various benefits, especially for genome research and rare disease research. However, ethical challenges that are derived from or exacerbated by online communication need to be addressed. Here, we present an overview of such ethical issues and provide practical guidance for the ethical implementation of ICT. We specify the ethical issues in the context of using online communication for medical research by an analysis based on the eight ethical principles for clinical research. Informed by this ethical context, we then develop a novel framework for the governance of medical research involving ICT, which consists of eight categories: five research processes (ie, design of research, recruitment, informed consent, data communication, and dissemination and return of results) and three overarching perspectives related to multiple processes of research (ie, access to research and online dialog, community involvement, and independent review). Finally, we present a practical guidance chart for researchers, patient partners, independent reviewers, and funding agencies. We believe that our study will contribute to the ethical implementation of online communication in medical research.

摘要

在线沟通(包括在线招募参与者、电子知情同意和数据沟通)是信息和通信技术(ICT)在医学研究中应用的领域之一。在线沟通提供了各种好处,特别是在基因组研究和罕见病研究方面。然而,在线沟通引发或加剧的伦理挑战需要得到解决。在这里,我们概述了这些伦理问题,并为 ICT 在医学研究中的伦理实施提供了实用指南。我们通过基于临床研究八项伦理原则的分析,在使用在线沟通进行医学研究的背景下具体阐述了伦理问题。在这一伦理背景下,我们制定了一个包含八项内容的新框架,用于管理涉及 ICT 的医学研究,其中包括五个研究流程(即研究设计、招募、知情同意、数据沟通以及研究结果的传播和反馈)和三个与研究的多个流程相关的总体视角(即研究的准入和在线对话、社区参与和独立审查)。最后,我们为研究人员、患者伙伴、独立审查人员和资助机构提供了一个实用指南图表。我们相信,我们的研究将有助于医学研究中在线沟通的伦理实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b81/9069285/2d07cc0229d7/jmir_v24i4e33167_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b81/9069285/e6b10879fcb6/jmir_v24i4e33167_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b81/9069285/2d07cc0229d7/jmir_v24i4e33167_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b81/9069285/e6b10879fcb6/jmir_v24i4e33167_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b81/9069285/2d07cc0229d7/jmir_v24i4e33167_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Framework and Practical Guidance for the Ethical Use of Electronic Methods for Communication With Participants in Medical Research.电子通讯在医学研究中使用的伦理框架和实用指南
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e33167. doi: 10.2196/33167.
2
Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.电子知情同意在生物医学研究中的实施及利益相关者的观点:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):e19129. doi: 10.2196/19129.
3
Ethical consideration of the research proposal and the informed-consent process: An online survey of researchers and ethics committee members in Thailand.研究提案和知情同意过程的伦理考虑:泰国研究人员和伦理委员会成员的在线调查。
Account Res. 2019 Apr;26(3):176-197. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2019.1608190. Epub 2019 May 16.
4
Ethical guidance for conducting health research with online communities: A scoping review of existing guidance.在线社区中开展健康研究的伦理指导:现有指导意见的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 May 17;19(5):e0302924. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302924. eCollection 2024.
5
The generic Informed Consent Service gICS: implementation and benefits of a modular consent software tool to master the challenge of electronic consent management in research.通用知情同意服务 gICS:模块化同意软件工具的实现和优势,可应对研究中电子同意管理的挑战。
J Transl Med. 2020 Jul 29;18(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02457-y.
6
Informed Consent in Two Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers: Insights From Research Coordinators.两个阿尔茨海默病研究中心的知情同意:来自研究协调员的见解
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):114-124. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1737982. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
7
Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.动态同意:现代生物医学研究中一些挑战的潜在解决方案。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Jan 25;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0162-9.
8
Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.生物样本库中的知情同意与研究治理:来自与医学研究人员焦点小组的证据
Public Health Genomics. 2012;15(5):232-42. doi: 10.1159/000336544. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
9
Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.电子知情同意书在研究伦理审查中的标准:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 21;23(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00849-x.
10
Personalized and long-term electronic informed consent in clinical research: stakeholder views.临床研究中的个性化和长期电子知情同意:利益相关者的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 31;22(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00675-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Moving beyond Technical Issues to Stakeholder Involvement: Key Areas for Consideration in the Development of Human-Centred and Trusted AI in Healthcare.从技术问题转向利益相关者参与:医疗保健领域以人为本且值得信赖的人工智能开发中的关键考虑领域。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun 21;16(3):501-511. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00300-w. eCollection 2024 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
The practice of active patient involvement in rare disease research using ICT: experiences and lessons from the RUDY JAPAN project.利用信息通信技术让患者积极参与罕见病研究的实践:来自“鲁迪日本”项目的经验与教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Feb 1;7(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00253-6.
2
Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.电子知情同意在生物医学研究中的实施及利益相关者的观点:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 8;22(10):e19129. doi: 10.2196/19129.
3
Landscape of Participant-Centric Initiatives for Medical Research in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan: Scoping Review.
美国、英国和日本以参与者为中心的医学研究计划全景:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 4;22(8):e16441. doi: 10.2196/16441.
4
Legal and Ethical Challenges of International Direct-to-Participant Genomic Research: Conclusions and Recommendations.国际直接面向参与者的基因组研究的法律与伦理挑战:结论与建议
J Law Med Ethics. 2019 Dec;47(4):705-731. doi: 10.1177/1073110519898297.
5
The "All of Us" Research Program.“All of Us”研究计划。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 15;381(7):668-676. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1809937.
6
A Novel Stakeholder Engagement Approach for Patient-centered Outcomes Research.一种以患者为中心的结局研究的新型利益相关者参与方法。
Med Care. 2018 Oct;56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S41-S47. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000790.
7
Authentication of Patients and Participants in Health Information Exchange and Consent for Medical Research: A Key Step for Privacy Protection, Respect for Autonomy, and Trustworthiness.健康信息交换中患者及参与者的身份验证与医学研究同意书:隐私保护、尊重自主权及可信度的关键步骤
Front Genet. 2018 Jun 1;9:167. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00167. eCollection 2018.
8
Using digital health to enable ethical health research in conflict and other humanitarian settings.利用数字健康技术在冲突及其他人道主义环境中开展符合伦理的健康研究。
Confl Health. 2018 May 14;12:23. doi: 10.1186/s13031-018-0163-z. eCollection 2018.
9
A digitally facilitated citizen-science driven approach accelerates participant recruitment and increases study population diversity.一种由数字技术推动、公民科学驱动的方法加快了参与者招募速度,并增加了研究人群的多样性。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 May 16;148:w14623. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14623. eCollection 2018.
10
Digital health: meeting the ethical and policy challenges.数字健康:应对伦理和政策挑战。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2018 Jan 16;148:w14571. doi: 10.4414/smw.2018.14571. eCollection 2018.