• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用心理健康商数评估人群幸福感:验证性研究

Assessment of Population Well-being With the Mental Health Quotient: Validation Study.

作者信息

Newson Jennifer Jane, Pastukh Vladyslav, Thiagarajan Tara C

机构信息

Sapien Labs, Arlington, VA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):e34105. doi: 10.2196/34105.

DOI:10.2196/34105
PMID:35442210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9069309/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Mental Health Quotient (MHQ) is an anonymous web-based assessment of mental health and well-being that comprehensively covers symptoms across 10 major psychiatric disorders, as well as positive elements of mental function. It uses a novel life impact scale and provides a score to the individual that places them on a spectrum from Distressed to Thriving along with a personal report that offers self-care recommendations. Since April 2020, the MHQ has been freely deployed as part of the Mental Health Million Project.

OBJECTIVE

This paper demonstrates the reliability and validity of the MHQ, including the construct validity of the life impact scale, sample and test-retest reliability of the assessment, and criterion validation of the MHQ with respect to clinical burden and productivity loss.

METHODS

Data were taken from the Mental Health Million open-access database (N=179,238) and included responses from English-speaking adults (aged≥18 years) from the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Singapore, India, and Nigeria collected during 2021. To assess sample reliability, random demographically matched samples (each 11,033/179,238, 6.16%) were compared within the same 6-month period. Test-retest reliability was determined using the subset of individuals who had taken the assessment twice ≥3 days apart (1907/179,238, 1.06%). To assess the construct validity of the life impact scale, additional questions were asked about the frequency and severity of an example symptom (feelings of sadness, distress, or hopelessness; 4247/179,238, 2.37%). To assess criterion validity, elements rated as having a highly negative life impact by a respondent (equivalent to experiencing the symptom ≥5 days a week) were mapped to clinical diagnostic criteria to calculate the clinical burden (174,618/179,238, 97.42%). In addition, MHQ scores were compared with the number of workdays missed or with reduced productivity in the past month (7625/179,238, 4.25%).

RESULTS

Distinct samples collected during the same period had indistinguishable MHQ distributions and MHQ scores were correlated with r=0.84 between retakes within an 8- to 120-day period. Life impact ratings were correlated with frequency and severity of symptoms, with a clear linear relationship (R>0.99). Furthermore, the aggregate MHQ scores were systematically related to both clinical burden and productivity. At one end of the scale, 89.08% (8986/10,087) of those in the Distressed category mapped to one or more disorders and had an average productivity loss of 15.2 (SD 11.2; SEM [standard error of measurement] 0.5) days per month. In contrast, at the other end of the scale, 0% (1/24,365) of those in the Thriving category mapped to any of the 10 disorders and had an average productivity loss of 1.3 (SD 3.6; SEM 0.1) days per month.

CONCLUSIONS

The MHQ is a valid and reliable assessment of mental health and well-being when delivered anonymously on the web.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/ec4a1492fb5e/mental_v9i4e34105_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/5fc7290ce357/mental_v9i4e34105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/454ac4d8ac5d/mental_v9i4e34105_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/32bd3690de43/mental_v9i4e34105_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/1dcc73b949f2/mental_v9i4e34105_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/ec4a1492fb5e/mental_v9i4e34105_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/5fc7290ce357/mental_v9i4e34105_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/454ac4d8ac5d/mental_v9i4e34105_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/32bd3690de43/mental_v9i4e34105_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/1dcc73b949f2/mental_v9i4e34105_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d479/9069309/ec4a1492fb5e/mental_v9i4e34105_fig5.jpg
摘要

背景

心理健康商数(MHQ)是一种基于网络的匿名心理健康与幸福状况评估工具,全面涵盖了10种主要精神障碍的症状以及心理功能的积极方面。它采用了一种新颖的生活影响量表,为个体提供一个分数,将其置于从痛苦到蓬勃发展的范围内,并提供一份包含自我护理建议的个人报告。自2020年4月以来,MHQ已作为心理健康百万项目的一部分免费部署。

目的

本文展示了MHQ的信度和效度,包括生活影响量表的结构效度、评估的样本及重测信度,以及MHQ在临床负担和生产力损失方面的效标效度。

方法

数据取自心理健康百万开放获取数据库(N = 179,238),包括2021年期间从美国、加拿大、英国、爱尔兰、澳大利亚、新西兰、南非、新加坡、印度和尼日利亚收集的讲英语的成年人(年龄≥18岁)的回复。为评估样本信度,在同一6个月期间内比较了随机抽取的人口统计学匹配样本(每组11,033/179,238,6.16%)。重测信度通过对间隔≥3天进行了两次评估的个体子集(1907/179,238,1.06%)来确定。为评估生活影响量表的结构效度,针对一个示例症状(悲伤、痛苦或绝望情绪)的频率和严重程度询问了额外问题(4247/179,238,2.37%)。为评估效标效度,将被调查者评定为对生活有高度负面影响的因素(相当于每周经历该症状≥5天)映射到临床诊断标准以计算临床负担(174,618/179,238,97.42%)。此外,将MHQ分数与过去一个月错过的工作日数量或生产力降低情况进行了比较(7625/179,238,4.25%)。

结果

同一时期收集的不同样本具有难以区分的MHQ分布,并且在8至120天内重测时,MHQ分数的相关性r = 0.84。生活影响评分与症状频率和严重程度相关,呈现出明显的线性关系(R>0.99)。此外,汇总的MHQ分数与临床负担和生产力均存在系统性关联。在量表的一端,处于痛苦类别的人中89.08%(8986/10,087)符合一种或多种障碍,每月平均生产力损失15.2(标准差11.2;测量标准误[SEM]0.5)天。相比之下,在量表的另一端,处于蓬勃发展类别的人中0%(1/24,365)符合10种障碍中的任何一种,每月平均生产力损失1.3(标准差3.6;SEM 0.1)天。

结论

当在网络上以匿名方式提供时,MHQ是一种有效且可靠的心理健康与幸福状况评估工具。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Population Well-being With the Mental Health Quotient: Validation Study.使用心理健康商数评估人群幸福感:验证性研究
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 20;9(4):e34105. doi: 10.2196/34105.
2
Assessment of Population Well-Being With the Mental Health Quotient (MHQ): Development and Usability Study.使用心理健康商数(MHQ)评估人群幸福感:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jul 20;7(7):e17935. doi: 10.2196/17935.
3
MHQ: constructing an aggregate metric of population mental wellbeing.MHQ:构建人口心理健康综合指标。
Popul Health Metr. 2024 Jul 17;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00336-y.
4
Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.给编辑的信:《ICD-11 与 DSM-5 心境障碍分类的趋同与分歧》
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2021;32(4):293-295. doi: 10.5080/u26899.
5
[Validation of the QFS measuring the frequency and satisfaction in social behaviours in psychiatric adult population].[用于评估成年精神病患者社交行为频率与满意度的QFS量表的验证]
Encephale. 2006 Jan-Feb;32(1 Pt 1):45-59. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(06)76136-x.
6
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
7
The effectiveness of web-based programs on the reduction of childhood obesity in school-aged children: A systematic review.基于网络的项目对学龄儿童肥胖症减轻的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-14. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-248.
8
Cannabis Use in Adults Who Screen Positive for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: CANreduce 2.0 Randomized Controlled Trial Subgroup Analysis.注意力缺陷/多动障碍筛查阳性成人中使用大麻:CANreduce 2.0 随机对照试验亚组分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 20;24(4):e30138. doi: 10.2196/30138.
9
Hierarchy of demographic and social determinants of mental health: analysis of cross-sectional survey data from the Global Mind Project.精神健康的人口统计学和社会决定因素的层级结构:来自全球心智项目的横断面调查数据的分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):e075095. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075095.
10
Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Health Technology Assessment.互联网提供的针对重度抑郁症和焦虑症的认知行为疗法:一项卫生技术评估。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(6):1-199. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
EEG Data Quality in Large-Scale Field Studies in India and Tanzania.印度和坦桑尼亚大规模实地研究中的脑电图(EEG)数据质量
eNeuro. 2025 Jul 25;12(7). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0006-25.2025. Print 2025 Jul.
2
Self-Guided Smartphone App (Vimbo) for the Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety in South African Adults: Pilot Quantitative Single-Arm Study.用于减轻南非成年人抑郁和焦虑症状的自助式智能手机应用程序(Vimbo):试点定量单臂研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 30;9:e54216. doi: 10.2196/54216.
3
MHQ: constructing an aggregate metric of population mental wellbeing.

本文引用的文献

1
Poor Separation of Clinical Symptom Profiles by DSM-5 Disorder Criteria.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)的疾病标准对临床症状特征的区分不佳。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 29;12:775762. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.775762. eCollection 2021.
2
The Model for Sustainable Mental Health: Future Directions for Integrating Positive Psychology Into Mental Health Care.可持续心理健康模式:将积极心理学融入心理保健的未来方向。
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21;12:747999. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747999. eCollection 2021.
3
The Productivity Commission inquiry into mental health.
MHQ:构建人口心理健康综合指标。
Popul Health Metr. 2024 Jul 17;22(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12963-024-00336-y.
4
Personalized Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Wellbeing and Empathy in Healthcare Professionals.基于个性化机器学习的医疗保健专业人员幸福感和同理心预测
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 20;24(8):2640. doi: 10.3390/s24082640.
5
Independent and Joint Associations of Physical Activity and Sleep on Mental Health Among a Global Sample of 200,743 Adults.200743名成年人全球样本中身体活动和睡眠对心理健康的独立及联合关联
Int J Behav Med. 2025 Apr;32(2):180-194. doi: 10.1007/s12529-024-10280-8. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
6
Hierarchy of demographic and social determinants of mental health: analysis of cross-sectional survey data from the Global Mind Project.精神健康的人口统计学和社会决定因素的层级结构:来自全球心智项目的横断面调查数据的分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):e075095. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075095.
生产力委员会对心理健康的调查。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;56(4):328-331. doi: 10.1177/00048674211031159. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
4
Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.新冠大流行期间心理健康问题的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Feb 15;281:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.117. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
5
Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.COVID-19 大流行影响人群中抑郁、焦虑、失眠、创伤后应激障碍和心理困扰症状的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jan;295:113599. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113599. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review.COVID-19 大流行对普通人群心理健康的影响:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Dec 1;277:55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
7
Dissecting diagnostic heterogeneity in depression by integrating neuroimaging and genetics.通过整合神经影像学和遗传学剖析抑郁症的诊断异质性。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jan;46(1):156-175. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00789-3. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
8
Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population.新冠疫情之前及期间的心理健康状况:一项针对英国人群的纵向概率抽样调查
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;7(10):883-892. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
9
Assessment of Population Well-Being With the Mental Health Quotient (MHQ): Development and Usability Study.使用心理健康商数(MHQ)评估人群幸福感:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Jul 20;7(7):e17935. doi: 10.2196/17935.
10
The role of RDoC in future classification of mental disorders
.RDoC 在未来精神障碍分类中的作用
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2020 Mar;22(1):81-85. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.1/bcuthbert.