12295Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, USA.
242612Rutgers University, New Brunswick, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Dec;39(12):1410-1417. doi: 10.1177/10499091221088497. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Given that the composition of hospice patients' terminal diagnoses has become increasingly diverse, understanding whether hospices provide quality care to patients, regardless of disease, is important. However, data comparing diagnosis and caregiver-reported outcomes remain scarce. To analyze the association between the composition of patients' terminal diagnoses and caregiver-reported quality measures. Using cross-sectional, publicly available data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services (CMS), we analyzed data collected from 2015-2019. We conducted general linear model analyses to identify associations between hospice characteristics/practices and caregiver-reported outcomes. Of the 2810 hospices, those that cared for a greater percentage of dementia patients had fewer caregivers, on average, who rated hospice a 9 or 10 (where 0 = low, 10 = high; β = -.094; 95% CI = -.147, -.038), reported they always received help for pain and symptoms (β = -.106, CI = -.156, -.056), and reported definitely having received the training they needed (β = -.151, CI = -.207, -.095). Those caring for more stroke patients had fewer caregivers, on average, who rated hospice a 9 or 10 (β = -.184, CI = .252, -.115), reported they always received help for pain and symptoms (β = -.188, CI = -.251, -.126), reported definitely having received the training they needed (β = -.254, CI = -.324, -.184), and reported that the hospice offered the right amount of emotional/spiritual support (β = -.056, CI = -.093, -.019). Hospices that cared for a greater proportion of dementia and stroke patients had poorer scores on caregiver-reported quality measures. These findings support efforts to identify mechanisms underlying these differences and to design strategies to ensure optimal outcomes for hospice patients regardless of diagnosis.
鉴于临终患者的终末诊断构成变得越来越多样化,了解临终关怀机构是否无论疾病如何都能为患者提供高质量的护理是很重要的。然而,比较诊断和护理人员报告的结果的数据仍然很少。
分析患者终末诊断构成与护理人员报告的质量指标之间的关联。
使用来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的公开的横断面数据,我们分析了 2015 年至 2019 年收集的数据。我们进行了一般线性模型分析,以确定临终关怀机构的特征/实践与护理人员报告的结果之间的关联。
在 2810 家临终关怀机构中,照顾痴呆症患者比例较高的临终关怀机构的护理人员平均较少,这些护理人员对临终关怀机构的评分在 9 或 10 分(0 分表示低,10 分表示高);报告他们总是得到疼痛和症状的帮助(β=-.106,CI=-.156,-.056);并报告他们肯定接受了所需的培训(β=-.151,CI=-.207,-.095)。照顾更多中风患者的临终关怀机构的护理人员平均较少,对临终关怀机构的评分在 9 或 10 分(β=-.184,CI=-.252,-.115);报告他们总是得到疼痛和症状的帮助(β=-.188,CI=-.251,-.126);报告他们肯定接受了所需的培训(β=-.254,CI=-.324,-.184);并报告临终关怀机构提供了适量的情感/精神支持(β=-.056,CI=-.093,-.019)。
照顾痴呆症和中风患者比例较高的临终关怀机构在护理人员报告的质量指标上得分较低。这些发现支持努力确定这些差异背后的机制,并设计策略,以确保临终关怀患者无论诊断如何都能获得最佳结果。