• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验情境对团队合作和个体表现的影响:实验室实验与在线实验的比较。

Effects of experimental situation on group cooperation and individual performance: Comparing laboratory and online experiments.

机构信息

Faculty of Law, Economics and Humanities, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Japan.

Institute for Organizational Behavior Research, Recruit Management Solutions, Co. Ltd., Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 20;17(4):e0267251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267251. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267251
PMID:35442983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9020741/
Abstract

With the spread of online behavioral experiments, estimating the effects of experimental situations and sample heterogeneity is increasing in discussions of the generalizability of data. In this study, we examined how the experimental situations (laboratory/online) affected group cooperation and individual performances. The participants were Japanese university students, randomly assigned to laboratory or online experiments. For the group cooperation task, they were asked to perform the public goods game with or without punishment, but no effect of the experimental situation was found both for cooperative and punitive behaviors. For the individual tasks, participants were asked to perform tasks including a creative task and a dull task. We manipulated the presence or absence of an external incentive. As a result, there was no significant difference between the experimental situations with one exception: only in the laboratory situation was the performance of the difficult creative task lower in the presence of an external incentive. Furthermore, we conducted as an additional experiment using the same treatments for a Japanese online-worker sample. This sample was less cooperative in the public goods game than the student sample, both with and without punishment. In addition, the presence of external incentives facilitated performance of the online-worker sample only for the dull task. We discuss the similarities and differences with previous studies that examined the effects of experimental situations and sample heterogeneity, and the implications for remote work in the real world.

摘要

随着在线行为实验的传播,在讨论数据的可推广性时,越来越多地需要估计实验情境和样本异质性的影响。在这项研究中,我们考察了实验情境(实验室/在线)如何影响群体合作和个体表现。参与者是日本大学生,随机分配到实验室或在线实验中。在群体合作任务中,他们被要求在有或没有惩罚的情况下进行公共物品博弈,但无论是合作行为还是惩罚行为,实验情境都没有影响。对于个体任务,参与者被要求完成包括创造性任务和枯燥任务在内的任务。我们操纵了外部激励的存在与否。结果,除了一个例外,实验情境之间没有显著差异:只有在实验室情境中,存在外部激励时,困难的创造性任务的表现会降低。此外,我们还进行了一项额外的实验,使用相同的处理方法对日本在线工作者样本进行实验。这个样本在公共物品博弈中比学生样本的合作程度要低,无论是有惩罚还是没有惩罚。此外,外部激励的存在仅有助于在线工作者样本完成枯燥任务。我们讨论了与之前研究的相似之处和差异,这些研究考察了实验情境和样本异质性的影响,以及对现实世界远程工作的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eb8/9020741/c1895fd22e27/pone.0267251.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eb8/9020741/b6a789475906/pone.0267251.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eb8/9020741/c1895fd22e27/pone.0267251.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eb8/9020741/b6a789475906/pone.0267251.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eb8/9020741/c1895fd22e27/pone.0267251.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of experimental situation on group cooperation and individual performance: Comparing laboratory and online experiments.实验情境对团队合作和个体表现的影响:实验室实验与在线实验的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 20;17(4):e0267251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267251. eCollection 2022.
2
Cooperation and evolutionary dynamics in the public goods game with institutional incentives.具有制度激励的公共物品博弈中的合作与演化动态。
J Theor Biol. 2012 Apr 21;299:144-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.07.030. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
3
Punitive preferences, monetary incentives and tacit coordination in the punishment of defectors promote cooperation in humans.惩罚背叛者时的惩罚性偏好、金钱激励和默契协调促进了人类的合作。
Sci Rep. 2015 May 19;5:10321. doi: 10.1038/srep10321.
4
The public goods game with shared punishment cost in well-mixed and structured populations.混合且结构化群体中具有共同惩罚成本的公共物品博弈。
J Theor Biol. 2019 Sep 7;476:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 May 28.
5
Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games.社会多样性促进了公共物品博弈中合作的出现。
Nature. 2008 Jul 10;454(7201):213-6. doi: 10.1038/nature06940.
6
Interactions between personality and institutions in cooperative behaviour in humans.人类合作行为中个性与制度之间的相互作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015 Dec 5;370(1683):20150011. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0011.
7
Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games.社会和经济激励对基于实际努力的公共物品博弈中合作的非对称影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0249217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249217. eCollection 2021.
8
Discriminatory punishment undermines the enforcement of group cooperation.歧视性惩罚破坏了团体合作的执行。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 13;13(1):6061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33167-2.
9
Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans.集中制裁和合法权威促进了人类的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jul 5;108(27):11023-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105456108. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
10
Which is the ideal sanction for cooperation? An experimental study on different types of third-party sanctions.哪种制裁方式最有利于促进合作?一项关于不同类型第三方制裁的实验研究。
Psych J. 2019 Jun;8(2):212-231. doi: 10.1002/pchj.259. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Behavior in motivational conflicts is determined by magnitude of potential outcomes and relates to anxiety levels.动机冲突中的行为由潜在结果的大小决定,并与焦虑水平相关。
Res Sq. 2025 Jun 24:rs.3.rs-6916454. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6916454/v1.

本文引用的文献

1
Reactions to (the absence of) control and workplace arrangements: experimental evidence from the internet and the laboratory.对(缺乏)控制及工作场所安排的反应:来自互联网及实验室的实验证据
Exp Econ. 2020;23(4):933-960. doi: 10.1007/s10683-020-09666-8. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
2
Conducting interactive experiments online.在线进行交互式实验。
Exp Econ. 2018;21(1):99-131. doi: 10.1007/s10683-017-9527-2. Epub 2017 May 9.
3
Experimental subjects are not different.实验对象没有差异。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1213. doi: 10.1038/srep01213.
4
Economic games on the internet: the effect of $1 stakes.网络经济博弈:1 美元赌注的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031461. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
5
EEG alpha synchronization is related to top-down processing in convergent and divergent thinking.脑电图阿尔法同步与聚合思维和发散思维的自上而下加工有关。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Oct;49(12):3505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Sep 10.
6
Reward, punishment, and cooperation: a meta-analysis.奖励、惩罚与合作:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2011 Jul;137(4):594-615. doi: 10.1037/a0023489.
7
Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments.基于网络的网络公共物品实验中的合作与传染。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 11;6(3):e16836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016836.
8
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.使用 G*Power 3.1 进行统计功效分析:相关和回归分析的检验。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
9
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.
10
Aha! Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere.啊哈!顿悟体验与右半球的解决方案激活相关。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Sep;10(3):730-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03196539.