Burek Katarzyna, Rabstein Sylvia, Kantermann Thomas, Vetter Céline, Rotter Markus, Wang-Sattler Rui, Lehnert Martin, Pallapies Dirk, Jöckel Karl-Heinz, Brüning Thomas, Behrens Thomas
Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), Bürkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Institute for Labor and Personnel (IAP), University of Applied Sciences for Economics and Management (FOM), Essen, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 20;12(1):6525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10054-w.
To examine the effect of night shift on salivary cortisol at awakening (C1), 30 min later (C2), and on the cortisol awakening response (CAR, the difference between C2 and C1). We compared shift and non-shift workers with a focus on the impact of worker chronotype. Our study included 66 shift-working females (mean age = 37.3 years, SD = 10.2) and 21 non-shift working females (mean age = 47.0 years, SD = 8.9). The shift workers collected their saliva samples at C1 and C2 on each two consecutive day shifts and night shifts. Non-shift workers collected their samples on two consecutive day shifts. We applied linear mixed-effects models (LMM) to determine the effect of night shift on CAR and log-transformed C1 and C2 levels. LMMs were stratified by chronotype group. Compared to non-shift workers, shift workers before day shifts (i.e. after night sleep) showed lower cortisol at C1 (exp [Formula: see text]=0.58, 95% CI 0.42, 0.81) but not at C2. In shift workers, the CARs after night shifts (i.e. after day sleep) were lower compared to CARs before day shifts ([Formula: see text]= - 11.07, 95% CI - 15.64, - 6.50). This effect was most pronounced in early chronotypes (early: [Formula: see text]= - 16.61, 95% CI - 27.87, - 5.35; intermediate: [Formula: see text]= - 11.82, 95% CI - 18.35, - 5.29; late: [Formula: see text]= - 6.27, 95% CI - 14.28, 1.74). Chronotype did not modify the association between night shift and CAR. In our population of shift workers, there was a mismatch between time of waking up and their natural cortisol peak at waking up (CAR) both during day and night shift duties.
为了研究夜班对觉醒时(C1)、30分钟后(C2)唾液皮质醇水平以及皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR,即C2与C1的差值)的影响。我们比较了轮班工人和非轮班工人,重点关注工人昼夜节律类型的影响。我们的研究纳入了66名轮班工作的女性(平均年龄 = 37.3岁,标准差 = 10.2)和21名非轮班工作的女性(平均年龄 = 47.0岁,标准差 = 8.9)。轮班工人在每两个连续的日班和夜班的C1和C2时间点采集唾液样本。非轮班工人在两个连续的日班采集样本。我们应用线性混合效应模型(LMM)来确定夜班对CAR以及经对数转换的C1和C2水平的影响。LMM按昼夜节律类型组进行分层。与非轮班工人相比,轮班工人在日班前(即夜间睡眠后)C1时的皮质醇水平较低(指数[公式:见原文]=0.58,95%置信区间0.42,0.81),但C2时没有差异。在轮班工人中,夜班后(即白天睡眠后)的CAR低于日班前的CAR([公式:见原文]= -11.07,95%置信区间 -15.64,-6.50)。这种影响在早起型昼夜节律的工人中最为明显(早起型:[公式:见原文]= -16.61,95%置信区间 -27.87,-5.35;中间型:[公式:见原文]= -11.82,95%置信区间 -18.35,-5.29;晚起型:[公式:见原文]= -6.27,95%置信区间 -14.28,1.74)。昼夜节律类型并未改变夜班与CAR之间的关联。在我们的轮班工人群体中,无论是在日班还是夜班工作期间,醒来时间与他们自然的觉醒时皮质醇峰值(CAR)之间都存在不匹配。