Pepin Jean-Louis, Le-Dong Nhat-Nam, Cuthbert Valérie, Coumans Nathalie, Tamisier Renaud, Malhotra Atul, Martinot Jean-Benoit
HP2 Laboratory, Inserm U1300, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Sunrise, Namur, Belgium.
Nat Sci Sleep. 2022 Apr 13;14:635-644. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S346229. eCollection 2022.
Differentiation between obstructive and central apneas and hypopneas requires quantitative measurement of respiratory effort (RE) using esophageal pressure (PES), which is rarely implemented. This study investigated whether the sleep mandibular movements (MM) signal recorded with a tri-axial gyroscopic chin sensor (Sunrise, Namur, Belgium) is a reliable surrogate of PES in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
In-laboratory polysomnography (PSG) with PES and concurrent MM monitoring was performed. PSGs were scored manually using AASM 2012 rules. Data blocks (n=8042) were randomly sampled during normal breathing (NB), obstructive or central apnea/hypopnea (OA/OH/CA/CH), respiratory effort-related arousal (RERA), and mixed apnea (MxA). Analyses were evaluation of the similarity and linear correlation between PES and MM using the longest common subsequence (LCSS) algorithm and Pearson's coefficient; description of signal amplitudes; estimation of the marginal effect for crossing from NB to a respiratory disturbance for a given change in MM signal using a mixed linear-regression.
Participants (n=38) had mild to severe OSA (median AH index 28.9/h; median arousal index 23.2/h). MM showed a high level of synchronization with concurrent PES signals. Distribution of MM amplitude differed significantly between event types: median (95% confidence interval) values of 0.60 (0.16-2.43) for CA, 0.83 (0.23-4.71) for CH, 1.93 (0.46-12.43) for MxA, 3.23 (0.72-18.09) for OH, and 6.42 (0.88-26.81) for OA. Mixed regression indicated that crossing from NB to central events would decrease MM signal amplitude by -1.23 (CH) and -2.04 (CA) units, while obstructive events would increase MM amplitude by +3.27 (OH) and +6.79 (OA) units (all p<10).
In OSA patients, MM signals facilitated the measurement of specific levels of RE associated with obstructive, central or mixed apneas and/or hypopneas. A high degree of similarity was observed with the PES gold-standard signal.
区分阻塞性和中枢性呼吸暂停及低通气需要使用食管压力(PES)对呼吸努力(RE)进行定量测量,但这种方法很少实施。本研究调查了使用三轴陀螺仪下巴传感器(比利时那慕尔的Sunrise)记录的睡眠下颌运动(MM)信号是否是疑似阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者PES的可靠替代指标。
进行了同时监测PES和MM的实验室多导睡眠图(PSG)检查。PSG根据美国睡眠医学会2012年规则进行人工评分。在正常呼吸(NB)、阻塞性或中枢性呼吸暂停/低通气(OA/OH/CA/CH)、呼吸努力相关觉醒(RERA)和混合性呼吸暂停(MxA)期间随机抽取数据块(n = 8042)。分析包括使用最长公共子序列(LCSS)算法和皮尔逊系数评估PES和MM之间的相似性和线性相关性;描述信号幅度;使用混合线性回归估计对于MM信号的给定变化从NB转变为呼吸紊乱的边际效应。
参与者(n = 38)患有轻度至重度OSA(中位数呼吸暂停低通气指数28.9次/小时;中位数觉醒指数23.2次/小时)。MM与同时记录的PES信号显示出高度同步性。MM幅度的分布在不同事件类型之间有显著差异:中枢性呼吸暂停(CA)的中位数(95%置信区间)值为0.60(0.16 - 2.43),中枢性低通气(CH)为0.83(0.23 - 4.71),混合性呼吸暂停(MxA)为1.93(0.46 - 12.43),阻塞性低通气(OH)为3.23(0.72 - 18.09),阻塞性呼吸暂停(OA)为6.42(0.88 - 26.81)。混合回归表明,从NB转变为中枢性事件会使MM信号幅度降低 -1.23(CH)和 -2.04(CA)个单位,而阻塞性事件会使MM幅度增加 +3.27(OH)和 +6.79(OA)个单位(所有p < 0.01)。
在OSA患者中,MM信号有助于测量与阻塞性、中枢性或混合性呼吸暂停和/或低通气相关的特定水平的呼吸努力。观察到与PES金标准信号有高度相似性。