Lakshmaiah Deepika, Irudayaraj Nancy, Ambeth Nivetha, Ramachandran Anupama, Sakthi Nikesh, Kumar Nirmal
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Chettinad Dental College and Research Institute, Chennai, IND.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ragas Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Sep 6;15(9):e44760. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44760. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Introduction Root canal morphology tends to be complicated by nature and dealing with this intricacy can be challenging because it makes it difficult to completely disinfect the root canal space. The success of root canal therapy is also determined by the biomechanical preparation of the canal with the application of instruments and irrigating solutions. Due to the fact that the root dentin surface continues to interact with the irrigating solution during preparation, it's critical to evaluate the mechanical characteristics and smear layer removal. Though sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is the most commonly used irrigant due to its tissue-dissolving abilities, it has certain drawbacks which include the inability to remove the smear layer and also affects the mechanical properties of root dentin. To overcome these limitations, a variety of herbal substitutes like and which possess anti-bacterial and anti-fungal properties can be used as endodontic irrigants. Several studies on the anti-bacterial properties of natural irrigants of pomegranate and amla were reported. However, the mechanical properties and smear layer removal of and have not been explored in the field of endodontics. Aim The main aim of this in vitro study is to compare and evaluate microhardness, smear layer removal efficacy and depth of penetration of herbal and conventional irrigants. Materials and methods Thirty-six palatal roots of maxillary molars were decoronated and instrumented up to F3. These roots were sectioned longitudinally and divided into three test groups: Group 1: 12.5% ; Group 2: 6.25% ; control: Group 3: 2.5% NaOCl. All specimens were irrigated with 5ml of each irrigant for 5 minutes. Microhardness of root dentin was measured using a Vickers diamond intender, smear layer removal using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and depth of penetration using a stereomicroscope. The data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the inter-group comparison using Tukey's post hoc test. Results Statistical analysis was done using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test using SPSS software version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago ). The highest microhardness was seen in Group 1 (cervical: 53.8375 ± 1.35956, middle: 53.9875 ± 1.01761, apical: 53.6875 ± 1.63133) while Group 2 (cervical: 43.2750 ± 1.73596, middle: 43.3125 ± 1.17648, apical: 43.8000 ± 1.32665) and Group 3 (cervical: 42.7250 ± 2.93391, middle: 41.9625 ± 1.66985, apical: 42.0250 ± 2.21085) showed significant reduction in root dentin hardness. Regardingsmear layer removal Group 1 (1.3750 ± 0.51755), and Group 2 (1.2500 ± 0.46291) reveals greater smear removal in the middle third of the root dentin compared with Group 3 (2.3750 ± 0.51755), which showed the least smear layer removal. A greater depth of penetration was seen in Group 1 (0.5488 ± 0.05222) and Group 2 (0.5263 ± 0.05181) than in Group 3 (0.3087 ± 0.05743). Conclusion The present study reveals that the least reduction of microhardness was seen in followed by and NaOCl. The smear layer removal efficacy and depth of penetration were greater in and than in NaOCl. It was concluded that as these herbal irrigants are biocompatible agents, they can be considered for future use in root canal treatment.
引言
根管形态本质上往往较为复杂,处理这种复杂性具有挑战性,因为这使得完全消毒根管空间变得困难。根管治疗的成功还取决于使用器械和冲洗液对根管进行的生物力学预备。由于在预备过程中根管牙本质表面持续与冲洗液相互作用,评估其力学特性和玷污层去除情况至关重要。尽管次氯酸钠(NaOCl)因其组织溶解能力是最常用的冲洗剂,但其存在一定缺点,包括无法去除玷污层,还会影响根管牙本质的力学性能。为克服这些局限性,多种具有抗菌和抗真菌特性的草药替代品,如石榴和印度醋栗,可以用作牙髓冲洗剂。已有多项关于石榴和印度醋栗天然冲洗剂抗菌特性的研究报道。然而,在牙髓病学领域,尚未对石榴和印度醋栗的力学性能及玷污层去除情况进行探索。
目的
本体外研究的主要目的是比较和评估草药冲洗剂与传统冲洗剂的显微硬度、玷污层去除效果及渗透深度。
材料和方法
将三十六颗上颌磨牙的腭根去冠并预备至F3。这些根纵向切开并分为三个试验组:第1组:12.5%[具体草药成分未给出];第2组:6.25%[具体草药成分未给出];对照组:第3组:2.5% NaOCl。所有标本用5毫升每种冲洗剂冲洗5分钟。使用维氏金刚石压头测量根管牙本质的显微硬度,使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察玷污层去除情况,使用体视显微镜观察渗透深度。数据采用单因素方差分析进行分析,并使用Tukey事后检验进行组间比较。
结果
使用SPSS软件版本17.0(SPSS公司,芝加哥)进行单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验。第1组(颈部:53.8375±1.35956,中部:53.9875±1.01761,根尖部:53.6875±1.63133)的显微硬度最高,而第2组(颈部:43.2750±1.73596,中部:43.3125±1.17648,根尖部:43.8000±1.32665)和第3组(颈部:42.7250±2.93391,中部:41.9625±1.66985,根尖部:42.0250±2.21085)的根管牙本质硬度显著降低。关于玷污层去除,与显示最少玷污层去除的第3组(2.3750±0.51755)相比,第1组(1.3750±0.51755)和第2组(1.2500±0.46291)在根管牙本质中三分之一处显示出更大的玷污层去除。第1组(0.5488±0.05222)和第2组(0.5263±0.05181)的渗透深度比第3组(0.3087±0.05743)更大。
结论
本研究表明,[具体草药成分未给出]对显微硬度的降低最少,其次是[具体草药成分未给出]和NaOCl。[具体草药成分未给出]和[具体草药成分未给出]的玷污层去除效果和渗透深度比NaOCl更大。得出的结论是,由于这些草药冲洗剂是生物相容性制剂,未来可考虑用于根管治疗。