Suppr超能文献

同名,同内容?DSM-5-TR 和 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍标准的评估。

Same name, same content? Evaluation of DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief criteria.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt.

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Leipzig.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Apr;90(4):303-313. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000720.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Investigating the concordance of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) criteria that have been recently introduced to the 5th text revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5-TR) and the International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11).

METHOD

N = 193 treatment-seeking bereaved adults were assessed with the prolonged grief disorder 13 + 9 interview. Data were examined in terms of (a) diagnostic rates for PGDDSM-5-TR and PGDICD-11, including increases of the PGDICD-11 accessory symptom threshold (PGDICD-11-X+) and time criterion (PGDICD-11-12 months), (b) dimensionality, (c) the frequency with which single PGD symptoms occur, and (d) concurrent validity in terms of psychological symptoms and loss-related characteristics.

RESULTS

The diagnostic rate of PGDDSM-5-TR (52%) was significantly lower than that of PGDICD-11 (76%) and agreement between the two criteria sets was moderate, κ = 0.51, 95% CI [0.47-0.55]. Increasing the PGDICD-11 accessory symptom threshold did not improve the diagnostic agreement. In contrast, increasing the ICD-11 time criterion led to almost perfect agreement between PGDICD-11-12 months and PGDDSM-5-TR, κ = 0.91, 95% CI [0.89-0.93]. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated a one-factor model fit best for both PGDDSM-5-TR and PGDICD-11. Emotional pain symptoms (e.g., guilt) were predominantly reported by patients with a PGDICD-11 diagnosis, while attachment disturbance symptoms (e.g., identity disruption) were reported more often by patients with a PGDDSM-5-TR diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite methodological limitations of this study, results indicate discordance in PGDDSM-5-TR and PGDICD-11 regarding diagnostic rates and single symptom occurrence, while the factor structure is similar. Changes in the ICD-11 time criterion could reduce these differences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

调查最近引入《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第 5 版修订本(DSM-5-TR)和《国际疾病分类第 11 版》(ICD-11)的延长哀伤障碍(PGD)标准的一致性。

方法

对 193 名寻求治疗的丧亲成年人进行了延长哀伤障碍 13 + 9 访谈。根据(a)PGDDSM-5-TR 和 PGDICD-11 的诊断率,包括增加 PGDICD-11 附加症状阈值(PGDICD-11-X+)和时间标准(PGDICD-11-12 个月)、(b)维度、(c)单个 PGD 症状发生的频率以及(d)心理症状和与损失相关的特征方面的同时有效性,对数据进行了检查。

结果

PGDDSM-5-TR 的诊断率(52%)明显低于 PGDICD-11(76%),两种标准之间的一致性为中等,κ=0.51,95%CI[0.47-0.55]。增加 PGDICD-11 附加症状阈值并不能提高诊断一致性。相比之下,增加 ICD-11 时间标准可使 PGDICD-11-12 个月和 PGDDSM-5-TR 之间的诊断一致性几乎达到完美,κ=0.91,95%CI[0.89-0.93]。验证性因素分析结果表明,对于 PGDDSM-5-TR 和 PGDICD-11,单因素模型拟合度最佳。情感痛苦症状(例如内疚)主要由患有 PGDICD-11 诊断的患者报告,而依恋障碍症状(例如身份破坏)则更多地由患有 PGDDSM-5-TR 诊断的患者报告。

结论

尽管本研究存在方法学上的局限性,但结果表明 PGDDSM-5-TR 和 PGDICD-11 在诊断率和单个症状发生方面存在差异,而因子结构相似。ICD-11 时间标准的变化可以减少这些差异。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2022 APA,保留所有权利)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验