• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“波动是常态”:创伤性脑损伤后处于意识障碍状态的患者的康复从业者对其工作中的模糊性和不确定性的看法。

"Fluctuation is the norm": Rehabilitation practitioner perspectives on ambiguity and uncertainty in their work with persons in disordered states of consciousness after traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

Departments of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, and Sociology, Oakland University, Rochester, MI, United States of America.

Department of Occupational Therapy, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0267194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267194. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0267194
PMID:35446897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9022828/
Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical lifeworld of rehabilitation practitioners who work with patients in disordered states of consciousness (DoC) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We interviewed 21 practitioners using narrative interviewing methods from two specialty health systems that admit patients in DoC to inpatient rehabilitation. The overarching theme arising from the interview data is "Experiencing ambiguity and uncertainty in clinical reasoning about consciousness" when treating persons in DoC. We describe practitioners' practices of looking for consistency, making sense of ambiguous and hard to explain patient responses, and using trial and error or "tinkering" to care for patients. Due to scientific uncertainty about diagnosis and prognosis in DoC and ambiguity about interpretation of patient responses, working in the field of DoC disrupts the canonical meaning-making processes that practitioners have been trained in. Studying the lifeworld of rehabilitation practitioners through their story-making and story-telling uncovers taken-for-granted assumptions and normative structures that may exist in rehabilitation medical and scientific culture, including practitioner training. We are interested in understanding these canonical breaches in order to make visible how practitioners make meaning while treating patients.

摘要

本研究旨在描述在严重创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 后处于意识障碍 (DoC) 状态的患者的康复从业者的临床生活世界。我们使用叙事访谈方法对来自两个专门收治 DoC 住院康复患者的医疗系统的 21 名从业者进行了访谈。从访谈数据中得出的首要主题是“在治疗 DoC 患者时,对意识的临床推理感到模糊和不确定”。我们描述了从业者寻找一致性、理解患者反应的模糊性和难以解释性,以及使用试错或“修补”来照顾患者的做法。由于 DoC 中的诊断和预后存在科学不确定性,以及对患者反应的解释存在模糊性,因此在 DoC 领域工作会扰乱从业者接受过的规范意义建构过程。通过从业者的故事创作和讲述来研究康复从业者的生活世界,揭示了可能存在于康复医学和科学文化中的一些想当然的假设和规范结构,包括从业者培训。我们有兴趣了解这些规范的突破,以便了解从业者在治疗患者时如何构建意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a8/9022828/bff98ac92da7/pone.0267194.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a8/9022828/bff98ac92da7/pone.0267194.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27a8/9022828/bff98ac92da7/pone.0267194.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
"Fluctuation is the norm": Rehabilitation practitioner perspectives on ambiguity and uncertainty in their work with persons in disordered states of consciousness after traumatic brain injury.“波动是常态”:创伤性脑损伤后处于意识障碍状态的患者的康复从业者对其工作中的模糊性和不确定性的看法。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 21;17(4):e0267194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267194. eCollection 2022.
2
Recovery of Consciousness and Functional Outcome in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.意识恢复和中重度创伤性脑损伤的功能预后。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 May 1;78(5):548-557. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0084.
3
Do rehospitalization rates differ among injury severity levels in the NIDRR Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems program?在 NIDRR 创伤性脑损伤模型系统计划中,不同损伤严重程度的再住院率是否存在差异?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1884-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.054. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
4
Specialized early treatment for persons with disorders of consciousness: program components and outcomes.特殊的意识障碍患者早期治疗:项目组成部分和结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1908-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.052. Epub 2013 May 31.
5
Minimum Competency Recommendations for Programs That Provide Rehabilitation Services for Persons With Disorders of Consciousness: A Position Statement of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.最低能力推荐为患有意识障碍的人提供康复服务的项目:美国康复医学学会和国家残疾、独立生活和康复研究创伤性脑损伤模型系统的立场声明。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jun;101(6):1072-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
6
Interventions Facilitating Recovery of Consciousness Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.促进创伤性脑损伤后意识恢复的干预措施:一项系统综述
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2023 Apr;43(2):322-336. doi: 10.1177/15394492221117779. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
7
Descriptive characteristics and rehabilitation outcomes in active duty military personnel and veterans with disorders of consciousness with combat- and noncombat-related brain injury.患有与战斗和非战斗相关脑损伤的意识障碍的现役军人和退伍军人的描述性特征和康复结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1861-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.05.027. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
8
Medical complications during inpatient rehabilitation among patients with traumatic disorders of consciousness.创伤性意识障碍患者住院康复期间的医疗并发症。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1877-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.027. Epub 2013 Jun 2.
9
Longitudinal outcome of patients with disordered consciousness in the NIDRR TBI Model Systems Programs.颅脑损伤康复研究中心 TBI 模型系统项目中意识障碍患者的纵向预后。
J Neurotrauma. 2012 Jan 1;29(1):59-65. doi: 10.1089/neu.2011.1829. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
10
Functional outcomes in traumatic disorders of consciousness: 5-year outcomes from the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.创伤性意识障碍的功能结果:国家残疾研究所和康复研究创伤性脑损伤模型系统的 5 年结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Oct;94(10):1855-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.041. Epub 2013 May 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring professional reasoning in occupational therapy: A scoping review of recent research.探索职业治疗中的专业推理:近期研究的范围综述
Br J Occup Ther. 2025 Jun;88(6):333-343. doi: 10.1177/03080226241310724. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
2
Behavioral Fluctuation in Disorders of Consciousness: A Retrospective Analysis.意识障碍中的行为波动:一项回顾性分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Mar 24. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.03.038.
3
Navigating uncertainty in low back pain care through an ethic of openness: Learnings from a post-critical analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum Competency Recommendations for Programs That Provide Rehabilitation Services for Persons With Disorders of Consciousness: A Position Statement of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.最低能力推荐为患有意识障碍的人提供康复服务的项目:美国康复医学学会和国家残疾、独立生活和康复研究创伤性脑损伤模型系统的立场声明。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Jun;101(6):1072-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Seeing minds in patients with disorders of consciousness.意识障碍患者的心灵感应。
Brain Inj. 2020 Feb 23;34(3):390-398. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1706000. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
3
通过开放的伦理观念应对腰痛护理中的不确定性:来自后批判分析的经验教训。
Health (London). 2025 Sep;29(5):609-632. doi: 10.1177/13634593241310383. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
4
Exploring bispectral index as an alternative to polysomnography for long-term sleep monitoring in disorders of consciousness.探索双谱指数作为多导睡眠图的替代方法,用于意识障碍患者的长期睡眠监测。
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 14;15:1408890. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1408890. eCollection 2024.
5
Cognitive Motor Dissociation in Disorders of Consciousness.意识障碍中的认知运动分离。
N Engl J Med. 2024 Aug 15;391(7):598-608. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2400645.
6
A New Process Model for Relationship-Centred Shared Decision-Making in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Settings.物理医学与康复环境中以关系为中心的共享决策制定的新过程模型。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14162. doi: 10.1111/hex.14162.
7
Interpreting Change in Disorders of Consciousness Using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised.使用昏迷恢复量表修订版解读意识障碍的变化。
J Neurotrauma. 2024 Aug;41(15-16):e1996-e2008. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0567. Epub 2024 May 10.
8
Feasibility and Validity of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised for Accelerated Standardized Testing: A Practical Assessment Tool for Detecting Consciousness in the Intensive Care Unit.昏迷恢复量表修订版加速标准化测试的可行性和有效性:一种用于在重症监护病房检测意识的实用评估工具。
Ann Neurol. 2023 Nov;94(5):919-924. doi: 10.1002/ana.26740. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
The micro-politics of caring: tinkering with person-centered rehabilitation.关怀的微观政治:对以患者为中心的康复进行调整
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(11):1529-1538. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587793. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
4
Disorders of Consciousness due to Traumatic Brain Injury: Functional Status Ten Years Post-Injury.创伤性脑损伤导致的意识障碍:损伤 10 年后的功能状态。
J Neurotrauma. 2019 Apr 1;36(7):1136-1146. doi: 10.1089/neu.2018.5954. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
5
Consciousness and Personhood in Medical Care.医疗中的意识与人格
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Aug 2;12:306. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00306. eCollection 2018.
6
Comprehensive Systematic Review Update Summary: Disorders of Consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.全面系统综述更新摘要:意识障碍:美国神经病学学会指南制定、传播和实施小组委员会;美国康复医学会;以及国家残疾、独立生活和康复研究所在此报告。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1710-1719. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
7
Practice Guideline Update Recommendations Summary: Disorders of Consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research.实践指南更新建议摘要:意识障碍:美国神经病学学会指南制定、传播和实施小组委员会;美国康复医学会;以及国家残疾、独立生活和康复研究所在此报告。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Sep;99(9):1699-1709. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
8
Are visual functions diagnostic signs of the minimally conscious state? an integrative review.视觉功能是否是最小意识状态的诊断标志?一项综合回顾。
J Neurol. 2018 Sep;265(9):1957-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8788-9. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
9
What do speech-language pathologists describe as most important when trying to achieve client participation during aphasia rehabilitation? A qualitative focus group interview study.言语语言病理学家在试图让失语症患者在康复过程中积极参与时,认为什么是最重要的?一项定性焦点小组访谈研究。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Oct;21(5):493-503. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2017.1413134. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
10
Reforming the taxonomy in disorders of consciousness.意识障碍分类学的改革。
Ann Neurol. 2017 Dec;82(6):866-872. doi: 10.1002/ana.25088. Epub 2017 Dec 4.