Tribst João Paulo Mendes, Dal Piva Amanda Maria de Oliveira, Kalman Les
Department of Dental Materials, Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam and Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond St., London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada.
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Apr 6;10(4):65. doi: 10.3390/dj10040065.
Mouthguards (MG) are protective devices that can reduce the risks of facial trauma. However, many athletes do not use them. Additionally, MG wear with coincidental parafunctional activity has not been considered. The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution as a consequence of a direct impact comparing a conventional MG with a novel hybrid appliance (HMG). Using computer-aided design (CAD) software, a human skull was modeled with the teeth inserted into their respective alveolus. The models were divided according to the MG type (conventional or hybrid). The geometries were exported to the computer-aided engineering (CAE) software and the materials were considered isotropic. Fixation was defined at the base of the maxilla. The load was applied using a hockey puck. The total deformation (mm) and the von Mises stress (MPa) results were obtained for the MGs (conventional and hybrid), upper teeth, lower teeth, and maxillary bone. Despite the presence of an MG, it is still possible to observe generated stress in all structures. However, the hybrid design was more efficient than the conventional design in reducing the displacement during the impact and consequently the stress on the upper teeth, lower teeth, and maxillary bone. Higher stress magnitude was more concentrated at the inner portion of the hybrid design than the conventional device. The HMG appliance decreased the stress concentration in the teeth and in the bone, limiting the areas susceptible to injuries to the regions directly impacted by the hockey puck. Although the novel HMG may mitigate injury, some stress will still result, and any possible injury should be evaluated by a dental professional.
护齿器(MG)是一种能降低面部创伤风险的防护装置。然而,许多运动员并不使用它们。此外,尚未考虑佩戴护齿器时同时存在的副功能活动情况。本研究的目的是通过比较传统护齿器与新型混合矫治器(HMG),评估直接撞击导致的应力分布情况。使用计算机辅助设计(CAD)软件,构建了一个将牙齿植入各自牙槽窝的人类头骨模型。这些模型根据护齿器类型(传统或混合)进行划分。将几何模型导出到计算机辅助工程(CAE)软件中,并将材料视为各向同性。在上颌骨底部定义固定条件。使用曲棍球进行加载。获得了传统和混合护齿器、上牙、下牙以及上颌骨的总变形(mm)和冯·米塞斯应力(MPa)结果。尽管存在护齿器,但仍可在所有结构中观察到产生的应力。然而,在减少撞击过程中的位移以及由此对上牙、下牙和上颌骨产生的应力方面,混合设计比传统设计更有效。与传统装置相比,混合设计中更高的应力幅值更集中在内部。HMG矫治器降低了牙齿和骨骼中的应力集中,将易受伤区域限制在曲棍球直接撞击的区域。尽管新型HMG可能减轻损伤,但仍会产生一些应力,任何可能的损伤都应由牙科专业人员进行评估。