Carl P, Crawford M E, Madsen N B, Ravlo O, Bach V, Larsen A I
Anesth Analg. 1987 Feb;66(2):142-6.
In a double-blind randomized study of three groups of 18 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery the efficacy and side effects of sublingual buprenorphine were tested and compared to intramuscular meperidine and buprenorphine. Single doses of either 75 mg of meperidine, 0.4 mg of sublingual buprenorphine, or 0.3 mg of intramuscular buprenorphine were used. Patients given buprenorphine as sublingual tablets were significantly more conscious in the immediate postoperative period (Glasgow Coma Scale) than when given buprenorphine or meperidine intramuscularly. Median pain intensity differences (PID) showed equal pain relief, whereas the summarized pain intensity differences (SPID) were significantly higher in the intramuscular buprenorphine group compared to the meperidine group. Three cases of respiratory acidosis in the meperidine group required IPPV treatment, and one case in the intramuscular buprenorphine group required treatment. Sedation and nausea were the most common side effects in all three groups. We conclude that sublingual buprenorphine is useful for relief of postoperative pain and exhibited administrative advantages, when the patients were able to cooperate.
在一项针对三组18例计划接受腹部大手术患者的双盲随机研究中,测试了舌下含服丁丙诺啡的疗效和副作用,并与肌肉注射哌替啶和丁丙诺啡进行了比较。使用了单剂量的75毫克哌替啶、0.4毫克舌下含服丁丙诺啡或0.3毫克肌肉注射丁丙诺啡。与肌肉注射丁丙诺啡或哌替啶相比,舌下含服丁丙诺啡片的患者在术后即刻(格拉斯哥昏迷量表)意识明显更清醒。中位疼痛强度差异(PID)显示止痛效果相同,而汇总疼痛强度差异(SPID)在肌肉注射丁丙诺啡组显著高于哌替啶组。哌替啶组有3例呼吸性酸中毒需要进行间歇正压通气治疗,肌肉注射丁丙诺啡组有1例需要治疗。镇静和恶心是所有三组中最常见的副作用。我们得出结论,当患者能够配合时,舌下含服丁丙诺啡有助于缓解术后疼痛并具有给药优势。