Mohiuddin Chowdhury Abu Taiub Mohammed, Kamal Aktar, Abbas Kafil Uddin, Talukder Shubhashis, Karim Md Rezaul, Ali Md Ahsan, Nuruzzaman Md, Li Yarui, He Shuixiang
Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (OSD-DGHS), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Apr 5;13:690726. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.690726. eCollection 2022.
In this study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of remdesivir and tocilizumab combination therapy against dexamethasone for the management of severe COVID-19 patients. This was a multicenter study. Cases were randomly chosen and divided into two groups using an odd-even ratio of 1:1 applied to the hospital registration number. Group A received remdesivir [5 mg/kg (<40 kg) or 200 mg (>40 kg) on day 1 and then 2.5 mg/kg (<40 kg) or 100 mg (>40 kg) daily] + tocilizumab [8 mg/kg up to 800 mg highest 12 h apart], and group B was the control and received dexamethasone 6 mg/day. In addition, a broad-spectrum antibiotic and other essential treatments were received by all patients. To evaluate the mortality risk, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was calculated on day-1. Treatment outcomes were measured as time to clinical improvement; mortality rate; duration of ICU stay; total period of hospitalization; the rate of (Supplementary Material) oxygen use; time to clinical failure; National Early Warning Score-2 (NEWS), and the percentage of lung recovery on CT of chest on discharge. Clinical trial registration ID: NCT04678739. Remdesivir-Tocilizumab group had a lower mortality rate (25.49%) than the control (30.77%). The time to clinical improvement (Group A-9.41; B-14.21 days), NEWS-2 on discharge (Group A-0.89; B-1.2), duration of ICU stay (Group A-7.68; B-10.58), and duration of hospitalization (Group A-9.91; B-14.68) were less in the treatment group. Group A had a better percentage of lung recovery on chest CT than the control (Group A-22.13; B-11.74). All these differences were statistically significant (= <0.05) in a -test. However, no significant survival benefit was found among the study groups in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, = 0.739. The remdesivir-tocilizumab combination had preferable outcomes compared to the dexamethasone therapy for the treatment of severe COVID-19 concerning mortality rate and clinical and pulmonary improvement, although it did not demonstrate a significant survival benefit. https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04678739.
在本研究中,我们调查了瑞德西韦和托珠单抗联合治疗对比地塞米松用于治疗重症COVID-19患者的疗效和安全性。这是一项多中心研究。病例通过对医院登记号采用1:1的奇偶比随机选取并分为两组。A组接受瑞德西韦[第1天5mg/kg(<40kg)或200mg(>40kg),然后每日2.5mg/kg(<40kg)或100mg(>40kg)]+托珠单抗[8mg/kg,最高800mg,间隔12小时给药],B组为对照组,接受地塞米松6mg/天。此外,所有患者均接受广谱抗生素和其他必要治疗。为评估死亡风险,在第1天计算序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分。治疗结果以临床改善时间、死亡率、ICU住院时间、总住院时间、(补充材料)吸氧率、临床失败时间、国家早期预警评分-2(NEWS)以及出院时胸部CT肺部恢复百分比来衡量。临床试验注册号:NCT04678739。瑞德西韦-托珠单抗组的死亡率(25.49%)低于对照组(30.77%)。治疗组的临床改善时间(A组-9.41天;B组-14.21天)、出院时的NEWS-2评分(A组-0.89;B组-1.2)、ICU住院时间(A组-7.68天;B组-10.58天)和住院时间(A组-9.91天;B组-14.68天)均较短。A组胸部CT肺部恢复百分比高于对照组(A组-22.13;B组-11.74)。在t检验中,所有这些差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,在Kaplan-Meier生存分析中,各研究组之间未发现显著的生存获益,P = 0.739。与地塞米松治疗相比,瑞德西韦-托珠单抗联合治疗在治疗重症COVID-19的死亡率以及临床和肺部改善方面具有更好的结果,尽管未显示出显著的生存获益。https://clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04678739。