Suppr超能文献

接种疫苗和未接种疫苗患者的COVID-19影像严重程度评估:意大利一家大型参考中心不同变体的比较

Imaging Severity COVID-19 Assessment in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Patients: Comparison of the Different Variants in a High Volume Italian Reference Center.

作者信息

Granata Vincenza, Fusco Roberta, Villanacci Alberta, Magliocchetti Simona, Urraro Fabrizio, Tetaj Nardi, Marchioni Luisa, Albarello Fabrizio, Campioni Paolo, Cristofaro Massimo, Di Stefano Federica, Fusco Nicoletta, Petrone Ada, Schininà Vincenzo, Grassi Francesca, Girardi Enrico, Ianniello Stefania

机构信息

Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale-IRCCS di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Medical Oncology Division, Igea SpA, 80013 Napoli, Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2022 Jun 10;12(6):955. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060955.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the vaccine effect by comparing five groups: unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant, unvaccinated patients with Delta variant, vaccinated patients with Delta variant, unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, and vaccinated patients with Omicron variant, assessing the “gravity” of COVID-19 pulmonary involvement, based on CT findings in critically ill patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: Patients were selected by ICU database considering the period from December 2021 to 23 March 2022, according to the following inclusion criteria: patients with proven Omicron variant COVID-19 infection with known COVID-19 vaccination with at least two doses and with chest Computed Tomography (CT) study during ICU hospitalization. Wee also evaluated the ICU database considering the period from March 2020 to December 2021, to select unvaccinated consecutive patients with Alpha variant, subjected to CT study, consecutive unvaccinated and vaccinated patients with Delta variant, subjected to CT study, and, consecutive unvaccinated patients with Omicron variant, subjected to CT study. CT images were evaluated qualitatively using a severity score scale of 5 levels (none involvement, mild: ≤25% of involvement, moderate: 26−50% of involvement, severe: 51−75% of involvement, and critical involvement: 76−100%) and quantitatively, using the Philips IntelliSpace Portal clinical application CT COPD computer tool. For each patient the lung volumetry was performed identifying the percentage value of aerated residual lung volume. Non-parametric tests for continuous and categorical variables were performed to assess statistically significant differences among groups. Results: The patient study group was composed of 13 vaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron V). As control groups we identified: 20 unvaccinated patients with Alpha variant (Alpha NV); 20 unvaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta NV); 18 vaccinated patients with Delta variant (Delta V); and 20 unvaccinated patients affected by the Omicron variant (Omicron NV). No differences between the groups under examination were found (p value > 0.05 at Chi square test) in terms of risk factors (age, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, immunosuppression, chronic kidney, cardiac, pulmonary, neurologic, and liver disease, etc.). A different median value of aerated residual lung volume was observed in the Delta variant groups: median value of aerated residual lung volume was 46.70% in unvaccinated patients compared to 67.10% in vaccinated patients. In addition, in patients with Delta variant every other extracted volume by automatic tool showed a statistically significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated group. Statistically significant differences were observed for each extracted volume by automatic tool between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant of COVID-19. Good statistically significant correlations among volumes extracted by automatic tool for each lung lobe and overall radiological severity score were obtained (ICC range 0.71−0.86). GGO was the main sign of COVID-19 lesions on CT images found in 87 of the 91 (95.6%) patients. No statistically significant differences were observed in CT findings (ground glass opacities (GGO), consolidation or crazy paving sign) among patient groups. Conclusion: In our study, we showed that in critically ill patients no difference were observed in terms of severity of disease or exitus, between unvaccinated and vaccinated patients. The only statistically significant differences were observed, with regard to the severity of COVID-19 pulmonary parenchymal involvement, between unvaccinated patients affected by Alpha variant and vaccinated patients affected by Delta variant, and between unvaccinated patients with Delta variant and vaccinated patients with Delta variant.

摘要

目的

通过比较五组患者来分析疫苗效果,这五组分别为:未接种疫苗的感染阿尔法变异株患者、未接种疫苗的感染德尔塔变异株患者、接种疫苗的感染德尔塔变异株患者、未接种疫苗的感染奥密克戎变异株患者以及接种疫苗的感染奥密克戎变异株患者,基于重症监护病房(ICU)收治的危重症患者的CT检查结果,评估新冠病毒肺炎累及肺部的“严重程度”。方法:通过ICU数据库选取2021年12月至2022年3月23日期间的患者,入选标准如下:确诊感染奥密克戎变异株新冠病毒且已知接种过至少两剂新冠疫苗、在ICU住院期间进行过胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)检查的患者。我们还评估了2020年3月至2021年12月期间的ICU数据库,以选取连续的未接种疫苗的感染阿尔法变异株且接受CT检查的患者、连续的未接种疫苗和接种疫苗的感染德尔塔变异株且接受CT检查的患者,以及连续的未接种疫苗的感染奥密克戎变异株且接受CT检查的患者。使用5级严重程度评分量表(无累及、轻度:累及≤25%、中度:累及26 - 50%、重度:累及51 - 75%、危重度:累及76 - 100%)对CT图像进行定性评估,并使用飞利浦IntelliSpace Portal临床应用CT慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)计算机工具进行定量评估。对每位患者进行肺容积测量,确定充气后残余肺容积的百分比值。对连续变量和分类变量进行非参数检验,以评估组间的统计学显著差异。结果:患者研究组由13例接种疫苗的感染奥密克戎变异株患者(奥密克戎V组)组成。作为对照组,我们确定了:20例未接种疫苗的感染阿尔法变异株患者(阿尔法NV组);20例未接种疫苗的感染德尔塔变异株患者(德尔塔NV组);18例接种疫苗的感染德尔塔变异株患者(德尔塔V组);以及20例未接种疫苗的感染奥密克戎变异株患者(奥密克戎NV组)。在风险因素(年龄、心血管疾病、糖尿病、免疫抑制、慢性肾病、心脏、肺部、神经和肝脏疾病等)方面,所检查的组间未发现差异(卡方检验p值>0.05)。在德尔塔变异株组中观察到充气后残余肺容积的中位数不同:未接种疫苗患者的充气后残余肺容积中位数为46.70%,而接种疫苗患者为67.10%。此外,对于德尔塔变异株患者,自动工具提取的每一个其他容积在接种疫苗组和未接种疫苗组之间均显示出统计学显著差异。对于感染阿尔法变异株的未接种疫苗患者和感染德尔塔变异株的接种疫苗患者,自动工具提取的每一个容积之间均观察到统计学显著差异。自动工具提取的每个肺叶容积与总体放射学严重程度评分之间获得了良好的统计学显著相关性(组内相关系数范围为0.71 - 0.86)。磨玻璃影(GGO)是91例患者中87例(95.6%)CT图像上新冠病毒肺炎病变的主要表现。患者组间在CT表现(磨玻璃影(GGO)、实变或铺路石征)方面未观察到统计学显著差异。结论:在我们的研究中,我们表明在危重症患者中,未接种疫苗和接种疫苗的患者在疾病严重程度或死亡率方面未观察到差异。仅在感染阿尔法变异株的未接种疫苗患者与感染德尔塔变异株的接种疫苗患者之间,以及感染德尔塔变异株的未接种疫苗患者与感染德尔塔变异株的接种疫苗患者之间,就新冠病毒肺炎肺实质累及的严重程度而言观察到了统计学显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cc1e/9224665/544e882bdc08/jpm-12-00955-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验