• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术者级别对急性胆囊炎行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析

Comparison of surgical outcomes of emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between attending surgeons and senior residents: A propensity-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Oct;15(4):728-736. doi: 10.1111/ases.13069. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1111/ases.13069
PMID:35451233
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is routinely performed for acute cholecystitis (AC) at our institution. This study was conducted to investigate the feasibility and safety of emergent LC for AC performed by senior residents.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 362 patients with AC who underwent emergent LC between January 2012 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Of these patients, 328 were operated on by senior residents (SR), and 34 were operated on by the attending surgeon (AS). Clinical characteristics and surgical and postoperative outcomes were compared between the SR and AS groups. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias. When the operator was an SR, the LC was assisted by the AS.

RESULTS

Before matching, in the SR group, more patients had a history of abdominal surgery, and C-reactive protein and white blood cell counts were significantly higher. In the image findings, the minor axis of the gallbladder (GB) was longer, and the wall of the GB was thicker in the SR group. After propensity score matching, 28 pairs were identified. There were no significant differences in operative time (83 vs 88 minutes, P = .92), the amount of blood loss (25 vs 10 mL, P = .13), conversion to open surgery (3.6% vs 3.6%, P = 1), postoperative complications (7.2% vs 0%, P = .74), and postoperative hospital stay (4 vs 4 days, P = .87).

CONCLUSION

Emergent LC for AC performed by SR under supervision appears to be feasible and safe.

摘要

简介

在我院,对于急性胆囊炎(AC),常规行紧急腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)。本研究旨在探讨由高年住院医师(SR)施行的 AC 紧急 LC 的可行性和安全性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 6 月期间 362 例 AC 患者行紧急 LC 的资料。其中 328 例由 SR 施行手术,34 例由主治医生(AS)施行手术。比较了 SR 组和 AS 组的临床特征、手术和术后结果。采用倾向评分匹配法以尽量减少选择偏倚。当手术医生为 SR 时,由 AS 协助进行 LC。

结果

在匹配前,SR 组中更多患者有腹部手术史,C 反应蛋白和白细胞计数显著升高。在影像学检查中,SR 组胆囊(GB)的短轴更长,GB 壁更厚。经过倾向评分匹配后,共匹配了 28 对。手术时间(83 分钟比 88 分钟,P=0.92)、出血量(25 毫升比 10 毫升,P=0.13)、中转开腹率(3.6%比 3.6%,P=1)、术后并发症发生率(7.2%比 0%,P=0.74)和术后住院时间(4 天比 4 天,P=0.87)均无显著差异。

结论

在监督下由 SR 施行的 AC 紧急 LC 似乎是可行且安全的。

相似文献

1
Comparison of surgical outcomes of emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between attending surgeons and senior residents: A propensity-matched analysis.术者级别对急性胆囊炎行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Oct;15(4):728-736. doi: 10.1111/ases.13069. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
Impact of resident involvement on patient outcomes in laparoscopic cholecystectomy of different degrees of complexity: analysis of 2331 cases.不同复杂程度腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者结局中住院医师参与的影响:2331 例分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):8975-8980. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09349-w. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
3
Efficacy and safety of B-mode ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in elderly and high-risk patients.B超引导下经皮经肝胆囊穿刺引流联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗老年高危急性胆囊炎的疗效及安全性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 9;15:81. doi: 10.1186/s12876-015-0294-2.
4
Feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis beyond 72 h of symptom onset.症状出现超过72小时的急性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的可行性。
Updates Surg. 2016 Dec;68(4):377-383. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0409-5. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
5
Evaluation of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the treatment of acute cholecystitis.早期与延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎的疗效评估。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jan-Feb;56(89):26-8.
6
Safety and feasibility of prolonged versus early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center retrospective study.急性胆囊炎行延期与早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性及可行性:一项单中心回顾性研究
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2297-2305. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07643-z. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
[Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy in acute cholecystitis: critical analysis of 520 cases].[急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术:520例病例的批判性分析]
Acta Med Port. 2014 Nov-Dec;27(6):685-91. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
8
Optimal timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis: A multi-institutional retrospective study.急性胆囊炎胆囊引流后腹腔镜胆囊切除术的最佳时机:一项多机构回顾性研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Aug;27(8):451-460. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.768. Epub 2020 Jun 21.
9
Preoperative risk factors for technical difficulty in emergent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎行急诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的技术难度术前相关因素。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Jan;15(1):82-89. doi: 10.1111/ases.12969. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an analysis of early versus delayed cholecystectomy and predictive factors for conversion.急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术:早期与延迟胆囊切除术分析及中转手术的预测因素
Minerva Chir. 2017 Dec;72(6):455-463. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07412-0. Epub 2017 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Standardization of a goal-oriented approach to acute cholecystitis: easy-to-follow steps for performing subtotal cholecystectomy.目标导向方法治疗急性胆囊炎的标准化:施行次全胆囊切除术的易于遵循的步骤。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 15;409(1):251. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03438-1.