Private practice, Niterói, Brazil.
Department of Statistics, Federal Fluminense University, Statistics and Mathematics Institute, Niterói, Brazil.
J Periodontol. 2022 Dec;93(12):1916-1928. doi: 10.1002/JPER.21-0615. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
This cross-sectional study assessed the role of gingival landmarks (GLs) and cutting points (CPs) for gingival phenotype (GP) determination.
Six maxillary anterior teeth (70 subjects) were evaluated using soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography (ST-CBCT). Gingival thickness was measured at different GLs: 1) tissue zone (gingival margin [GM], 1 and 2 mm apical to GM, cemento-enamel junction, above the bone crest); 2) bone zone (buccal bone crest [BBC], 1, 2, and 3 mm apical to BBC). CPs of 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, and 1.5 mm were used to discriminate between thin and thick GP. The clinical determination of GP was made based on transparency of the periodontal probe (TRAN).
The prevalence of thin and thick GP depended on the GL and CP. Considering the CP (1 mm), thin GP at the tissue zone ranged from 99% at the GM to 10.2% above the bone crest. In the bone zone, thick GP ranged from 28% at the BBC to 6% at 3 mm apical to the BBC. The predictability of a correct assessment of GP by TRAN compared with ST-CBCT was influenced by the GLs and CPs. A slight agreement (kappa <0.2) and low accuracy (area under the curve <0.7) were found between methods.
The determination of thin and thick GPs is related to the gingival landmarks and CPs. Further studies are required for a well-defined treatment protocol considering different gingival landmarks in tissue and bone zones. An ST-CBCT may be useful for this purpose.
本横断面研究评估了牙龈标志点(GL)和切点(CP)在确定牙龈表型(GP)中的作用。
使用软组织锥形束 CT(ST-CBCT)对 6 颗上颌前牙(70 名受试者)进行评估。在不同的 GL 处测量牙龈厚度:1)组织区(牙龈边缘[GM]、GM 上方 1 和 2mm 处、牙骨质-釉质交界处、牙槽嵴上方);2)骨区(颊侧牙槽嵴[BBC]、BBC 上方 1、2 和 3mm 处)。使用 0.6、0.8、1.0、1.2 和 1.5mm 的 CP 来区分薄型和厚型 GP。GP 的临床确定基于牙周探针的透明度(TRAN)。
薄型和厚型 GP 的患病率取决于 GL 和 CP。考虑 CP(1mm)时,组织区的薄型 GP 从 GM 处的 99%到牙槽嵴上方的 10.2%不等。在骨区,厚型 GP 从 BBC 处的 28%到 BBC 上方 3mm 处的 6%不等。TRAN 与 ST-CBCT 相比,正确评估 GP 的预测性受 GL 和 CP 的影响。两种方法之间的一致性较弱(kappa<0.2),准确性较低(曲线下面积<0.7)。
薄型和厚型 GP 的确定与牙龈标志点和 CP 有关。需要进一步研究以制定考虑组织和骨区不同牙龈标志点的明确治疗方案。ST-CBCT 可能对此有用。