Suppr超能文献

上颌切牙颊侧骨皮质和牙龈厚度的综合相关分析。

Integrated correlation analysis of the thickness of buccal bone and gingiva of maxillary incisors.

机构信息

Sun Yat-sen University , Guanghua School of Stomatology , Hospital of Stomatology , Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Guangzhou , China .

Sun Yat-sen University , Guanghua School of Stomatology , Hospital of Stomatology , Department of Oral Implantology, Guangzhou , China .

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2024 Jun 14;32:e20240018. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2024-0018. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to validate the integrated correlation between the buccal bone and gingival thickness of the anterior maxilla, and to gain insight into the reference plane selection when measuring these two tissues before treatment with implants.

METHODOLOGY

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and model scans of 350 human subjects were registered in the coDiagnostiX software to obtain sagittal maxillary incisor sections. The buccal bone thickness was measured at the coronal (2, 4, and 6 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction [CEJ]) and apical (0, 2, and 4 mm coronal to the apex plane) regions. The buccal gingival thickness was measured at the supra-CEJ (0, 1mm coronal to the CEJ) and sub-CEJ regions (1, 2, 4, and 6 mm apical to the CEJ). Canonical correlation analysis was performed for intergroup correlation analysis and investigation of key parameters.

RESULTS

The mean thicknesses of the buccal bone and gingiva at different levels were 0.641.88 mm and 0.661.37 mm, respectively. There was a strong intergroup canonical correlation between the thickness of the buccal bone and that of the gingiva (r=0.837). The thickness of the buccal bone and gingiva at 2 mm apical to the CEJ are the most important indices with the highest canonical correlation coefficient and loadings. The most and least prevalent subgroups were the thin bone and thick gingiva group (accounting for 47.6%) and the thick bone and thick gingiva group (accounting for 8.6%).

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the thickness of the buccal bone is significantly correlated with that of the buccal gingiva, and the 2 mm region apical to the CEJ is a vital plane for quantifying the thickness of these two tissues.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证上颌前牙颊侧骨和龈侧组织厚度之间的综合相关性,并深入了解在植入治疗前测量这两种组织时参考平面的选择。

方法

将 350 名患者的锥形束 CT(CBCT)和模型扫描注册到 coDiagnostiX 软件中,以获取矢状上颌切牙切片。颊侧骨厚度在冠方(距釉牙骨质界[CEJ] 2、4 和 6mm 处)和根尖方(根尖平面冠方 0、2 和 4mm 处)进行测量。颊侧龈厚度在 CEJ 上方(0、CEJ 上方 1mm)和 CEJ 下方(1、2、4 和 6mm 处)进行测量。采用典型相关分析进行组间相关性分析和关键参数研究。

结果

不同水平的颊侧骨和龈厚度的平均值分别为 0.641.88mm 和 0.661.37mm。颊侧骨和龈厚度之间存在强烈的组间典型相关性(r=0.837)。CEJ 根尖方 2mm 处的颊侧骨和龈厚度是最重要的指标,具有最高的典型相关系数和负荷。最常见和最不常见的亚组分别是薄骨和厚龈组(占 47.6%)和厚骨和厚龈组(占 8.6%)。

结论

在本回顾性研究的限制范围内,颊侧骨厚度与颊侧龈厚度显著相关,CEJ 根尖方 2mm 处是量化这两种组织厚度的重要平面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c362/11178351/10c06d743f5a/1678-7757-jaos-32-e20240018-gf01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验