• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为自我调节策略的计划采纳:干预试验中青少年(不)计划体育活动的原因。

Uptake of planning as a self-regulation strategy: Adolescents' reasons for (not) planning physical activity in an intervention trial.

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Nov;27(4):1209-1225. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12595. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12595
PMID:35451544
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9790213/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Planning is an effective self-regulation strategy. However, little is known why some people take up planning and some do not. Such understanding would help interventions to promote planning. We investigated how adolescents explain their (non) use of planning for physical activity after an intervention.

METHODS

Qualitative content analysis was employed to investigate follow-up interviews (a purposeful sampling; n = 19 low-to-moderately active, vocational school students) of Let's Move It trial participants twice post-intervention: 6-8 weeks and 14 months post-baseline. In the intervention, planning was one of the key techniques used to promote PA.

RESULTS

We identified seven categories linked to reasons for (not) using planning. Most were related to feelings anticipated to result from planning. Action- and identity-related concerns were also raised. The reasons for planning were that the plan (1) helps to clarify what to do and to get things done, (2) strengthens the feeling of autonomy, (3) promotes a sense of progress, ability and control over one's PA. The reasons for not planning were that (having) a plan may (1) feel forced and like an unpleasant duty, (2) take away life's spontaneity and freedom, (3) result in anticipated annoyance and bad mood if one fails to enact the plan, or (4) be an effective strategy for others but not for the interviewee.

CONCLUSIONS

Planning may not only link to behavioural control but also the sense of autonomy, and thus subsequent motivation. We suggest various strategies to promote planning, including challenging non-planner identity and harnessing social dimension of planning.

摘要

目的

计划是一种有效的自我调节策略。然而,人们对于为什么有些人会计划,而有些人则不会,知之甚少。这种理解将有助于促进计划的干预措施。我们调查了青少年在干预后如何解释他们(不)使用计划来进行体育活动。

方法

采用定性内容分析方法,对 Let's Move It 试验参与者的随访访谈(目的抽样;n = 19 名低到中度活跃的职业学校学生)进行了两次调查:干预后 6-8 周和基线后 14 个月。在干预中,计划是促进 PA 的关键技术之一。

结果

我们确定了与(不)使用计划相关的七个类别。大多数与预期因计划而产生的感觉有关。还提出了与行动和身份相关的担忧。计划的原因是计划(1)有助于明确要做什么并完成任务,(2)增强自主性的感觉,(3)促进对自己 PA 的进步、能力和控制感。不计划的原因是,(有)一个计划可能(1)感觉被迫,像一项不愉快的任务,(2)剥夺生活的自发性和自由,(3)如果一个人未能执行计划,可能会导致预期的烦恼和心情不好,或者(4)对其他人来说是一个有效的策略,但对受访者来说并非如此。

结论

计划不仅与行为控制有关,而且与自主性以及随后的动机有关。我们建议了各种促进计划的策略,包括挑战非计划者的身份和利用计划的社会维度。

相似文献

1
Uptake of planning as a self-regulation strategy: Adolescents' reasons for (not) planning physical activity in an intervention trial.作为自我调节策略的计划采纳:干预试验中青少年(不)计划体育活动的原因。
Br J Health Psychol. 2022 Nov;27(4):1209-1225. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12595. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
'Let's Move It' - a school-based multilevel intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour among older adolescents in vocational secondary schools: a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial.“动起来”——一项以职业中学大龄青少年为对象、增加身体活动并减少久坐行为的校内多层次干预措施:一项整群随机试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 27;16:451. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3094-x.
3
A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an individual planning intervention with collaborative planning in adolescent friendship dyads to enhance physical activity (TWOgether).一项比较个体计划干预与合作计划对青少年友谊对增强身体活动的有效性的整群随机对照试验(TWOgether)。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 24;18(1):911. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5818-6.
4
Randomised controlled feasibility study of a school-based multi-level intervention to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behaviour among vocational school students.一项基于学校的多层次干预措施的随机对照可行性研究,旨在增加职业学校学生的身体活动并减少久坐行为。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Mar 21;14(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0484-0.
5
Thematic analysis of acceptability and fidelity of engagement for behaviour change interventions: The Let's Move It intervention interview study.行为改变干预措施可接受性和参与度的主题分析:Let's Move It 干预访谈研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):772-789. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12433. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
6
Web-based need-supportive parenting program to promote physical activity in secondary school students: a randomized controlled pilot trial.基于网络的支持需求型亲职教育方案对促进中学生身体活动的随机对照试验:一项先导性研究
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 25;23(1):1627. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16528-4.
7
Testing a physical education-delivered autonomy supportive intervention to promote leisure-time physical activity in lower secondary school students: the PETALS trial.测试一项由体育教育实施的自主性支持干预措施,以促进初中学生的休闲体育活动:PETALS试验。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):1438. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09518-3.
8
A cluster-randomized controlled trial of strategies to increase adolescents' physical activity and motivation during physical education lessons: the Motivating Active Learning in Physical Education (MALP) trial.一项旨在提高青少年在体育课中身体活动和积极性的策略的整群随机对照试验:激励体育教育中的主动学习(MALP)试验。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Oct 1;12:834. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-834.
9
Using physical education to promote out-of school physical activity in lower secondary school students - a randomized controlled trial protocol.利用体育教育促进初中生校外体育活动——一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 6;19(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6478-x.
10
How does a school-based intervention impact students' social cognitions on reducing sedentary behavior over 14 months?基于学校的干预如何在 14 个月的时间里影响学生减少久坐行为的社会认知?
Psychol Health Med. 2024 Aug;29(7):1235-1249. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2285734. Epub 2023 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of the Let's Move It multi-level vocational school-based intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior: a cluster randomized trial.“动起来”多层次职业学校干预措施对身体活动和久坐行为的有效性:一项整群随机试验
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf023.
2
Evaluating the Let's Move It intervention programme theory for adolescents' physical activity: Theorized psychosocial mechanisms of behavioural changes.评估“让我们动起来”干预计划理论对青少年身体活动的影响:行为变化的理论化心理社会机制。
Br J Health Psychol. 2025 Feb;30(1):e12744. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12744. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Physical activity behaviours in adolescence: current evidence and opportunities for intervention.青少年的身体活动行为:当前的证据和干预机会。
Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):429-442. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01259-9. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
2
Changing activity behaviours in vocational school students: the stepwise development and optimised content of the 'let's move it' intervention.改变职业学校学生的活动行为:“让我们动起来”干预措施的逐步发展与优化内容
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2020 Sep 27;8(1):440-460. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1813036.
3
Visualisation and network analysis of physical activity and its determinants: Demonstrating opportunities in analysing baseline associations in the Let's Move It trial.身体活动及其决定因素的可视化与网络分析:展示“让我们动起来”试验中分析基线关联的机会。
Health Psychol Behav Med. 2019 Jul 25;7(1):269-289. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2019.1646136.
4
2020 WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour for children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: summary of the evidence.2020 年世卫组织关于 5-17 岁儿童和青少年身体活动与久坐行为的指南:证据总结。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Nov 26;17(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01037-z.
5
Participants' enactment of behavior change techniques: a call for increased focus on what people do to manage their motivation and behavior.参与者对行为改变技巧的运用:呼吁更加关注人们为管理自身动机和行为所采取的行动。
Health Psychol Rev. 2021 Jun;15(2):185-194. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1814836. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
6
Thematic analysis of acceptability and fidelity of engagement for behaviour change interventions: The Let's Move It intervention interview study.行为改变干预措施可接受性和参与度的主题分析:Let's Move It 干预访谈研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Sep;25(3):772-789. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12433. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
7
Integrating intrapersonal and interpersonal processes: a key step in advancing the science of behavior change.整合个人内部和人际过程:推进行为改变科学的关键一步。
Health Psychol Rev. 2020 Mar;14(1):182-187. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1719183.
8
The compendium of self-enactable techniques to change and self-manage motivation and behaviour v.1.0.自我实施技术纲要,用于改变和自我管理动机和行为 v.1.0.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Feb;4(2):215-223. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0798-9. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
9
Using the critical incident technique for qualitative process evaluation of interventions: The example of the "Let's Move It" trial.运用关键事件技术对干预措施进行定性过程评估:以“让我们动起来”试验为例。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:389-397. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 15.
10
Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1·9 million participants.全球 2001 年至 2016 年身体活动不足趋势分析:基于 358 项以人群为基础的调查的汇总分析,涉及 190 万参与者。
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Oct;6(10):e1077-e1086. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7. Epub 2018 Sep 4.