Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
School of Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Psychol Health Med. 2024 Aug;29(7):1235-1249. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2285734. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
Despite sedentary behavior being ubiquitous in students and detrimental to health, interventions specifically targeting it are mostly restricted to leisure time screen time reduction. With six weekly sessions alongside a poster campaign and an additional teacher intervention, the Let's Move It trial delivered environmental and psychological strategies to increase physical activity (PA) and reduce sedentary behavior (SB) in vocational schools, an understudied environment for behavioral interventions. Participants in the intervention arm considerably reduced sedentary time post-intervention. To investigate how social cognitions about restricting SB, as defined by the Reasoned Action Approach, change in intervention and control arms, self-reported data on social cognitions was collected as part of a cluster-randomized controlled trial from 1166 students (59% female, m = 18.7 years, range: 16-49) in six vocational schools before, post-intervention, and 14 months post-baseline. Data were analyzed using mixed between-within repeated measures ANOVA. We found greater improvements in intention (F(1, 833) = 9.69; η = 0.01; = .018) and descriptive norms (F(1, 831) = 13.25; η = 0.016; < .001) in the intervention than control arm, but these effects depended on the included control variables. Generally, intervention effects leveled off from post-intervention to follow-up. The Let's Move It intervention for SB reduction showed modest, short-lived effects on social cognitions, indicating that changes in behavior are likely due to other factors like changes to the classroom environment. Optimally, SB reduction interventions should not only change behavior but produce robust changes in conscious intentions to restrict one's sitting, so that positive effects generalize to other contexts.
尽管学生中普遍存在久坐行为,且对健康有害,但专门针对该行为的干预措施大多仅限于减少休闲时间的屏幕时间。Let's Move It 试验通过每周六次的课程、海报宣传活动和额外的教师干预,提供了环境和心理策略,以增加职业学校学生的身体活动(PA)并减少久坐行为(SB),职业学校是行为干预研究较少的环境。干预组在干预后久坐时间显著减少。为了研究限制 SB 的社会认知(如理性行为方法所定义)如何在干预组和对照组中发生变化,作为一项基于群组的随机对照试验的一部分,我们从六所职业学校的 1166 名学生(59%为女性,m=18.7 岁,范围为 16-49 岁)中收集了与社会认知相关的自我报告数据,这些数据在干预前、干预后和基线后 14 个月进行收集。使用混合重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。我们发现,与对照组相比,干预组的意图(F(1, 833)=9.69;η=0.01; = .018)和描述性规范(F(1, 831)=13.25;η=0.016; < .001)有更大的改善,但这些效果取决于所包含的控制变量。一般来说,干预效果从干预后到随访时趋于平稳。Let's Move It 干预减少 SB 对社会认知的影响适度且短暂,这表明行为的变化可能归因于其他因素,如课堂环境的改变。最理想的情况是,减少 SB 的干预措施不仅要改变行为,还要在限制久坐的有意识意图上产生稳健的变化,以便将积极影响推广到其他环境。