Suppr超能文献

“动起来”多层次职业学校干预措施对身体活动和久坐行为的有效性:一项整群随机试验

Effectiveness of the Let's Move It multi-level vocational school-based intervention on physical activity and sedentary behavior: a cluster randomized trial.

作者信息

Hankonen Nelli, Haukkala Ari, Palsola Minttu, Heino Matti Toivo Juhani, Sund Reijo, Tokola Kari, Absetz Pilvikki, Araújo-Soares Vera, Sniehotta Falko F, Borodulin Katja, Uutela Antti, Lintunen Taru, Vasankari Tommi

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, 33014 Tampere, Finland.

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaf023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low levels of physical activity (PA), more prevalent among those with low education, require effective interventions. Fewer trials have tested interventions to decrease sedentary behavior (SB). No school-based interventions have shown lasting effects on PA or SB in vocational schools.

PURPOSE

To examine whether the Let's Move It intervention has effects on behavioral and clinical outcomes among vocational students after 2 and 14 months.

METHODS

A cluster randomized trial in 6 school units in vocational education in Finland (N = 1112) (mean age 18.5 years, range 15-46). The multi-component intervention targeted in-class activity opportunities (eg, teacher-led activity breaks, equipment in classrooms), and students' motivation and self-regulation (eg, 6 group sessions, à 45-60 min, during the intensive intervention period of 2 months). Valid (≥ 4 days, ≥ 10 h/day) accelerometer data were obtained from 741 students at baseline, 521 (70.3%) at 2 months, and 406 (54.8%) at 14 months.

RESULTS

No evidence of a significant intervention effect on the co-primary outcomes (moderate-to-vigorous PA, SB, breaks in SB) was found. Participants in the intervention arm reduced their total daily SB time by 32 min (95% CI, -43.2 to -20.8) on weekdays, compared with the control arm's reduction of 8.6 (95% CI, -19.5 to 2.3) and engaged in more accelerometer-measured light PA during school time. Few differences were found in secondary outcomes. The fidelity of intervention delivery was relatively good.

CONCLUSIONS

This school-based intervention did not affect leisure-time activity. Despite a positive outcome on school-time light PA, more comprehensive or intensive environmental changes may be needed to meaningfully improve vocational students' total activity.

摘要

背景

低水平的身体活动(PA)在受教育程度低的人群中更为普遍,需要有效的干预措施。测试减少久坐行为(SB)干预措施的试验较少。尚无基于学校的干预措施对职业学校学生的身体活动或久坐行为产生持久影响。

目的

研究“动起来”干预措施在2个月和14个月后对职业学校学生的行为和临床结局是否有影响。

方法

在芬兰6个职业教育学校单位进行整群随机试验(N = 1112)(平均年龄18.5岁,范围15 - 46岁)。多成分干预针对课堂活动机会(如教师主导的活动休息、教室设备)以及学生的动机和自我调节(如在2个月的强化干预期内进行6次小组课程,每次45 - 60分钟)。从741名学生基线时、2个月时的521名(70.3%)以及14个月时的406名(54.8%)学生中获取了有效的(≥4天,≥10小时/天)加速度计数据。

结果

未发现对共同主要结局(中等到剧烈身体活动、久坐行为、久坐行为中断)有显著干预效果的证据。与对照组减少8.6分钟(95%CI,-19.5至2.3)相比,干预组参与者在工作日将每日总久坐时间减少了32分钟(95%CI,-43.2至-20.8),并且在上学期间进行了更多加速度计测量的轻度身体活动。次要结局方面差异较少。干预实施的保真度相对较好。

结论

这种基于学校的干预措施并未影响休闲时间的活动。尽管对上学期间的轻度身体活动有积极影响,但可能需要更全面或深入的环境改变才能切实改善职业学校学生的总体活动水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72fb/12169330/2ce961dcc717/kaaf023_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验