Department of Neonatal Surgery, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Jul;181(7):2593-2601. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04454-3. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and the optimal intervention remains uncertain. To compare the mortality of primary peritoneal drainage versus primary peritoneal laparotomy as initial surgical intervention for NEC. All data were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies published up to December 2021. Patients with NEC. Studies centered on primary peritoneal drainage and primary peritoneal laparotomy as the initial surgical treatment. Mortality outcomes were available for both interventions. Randomized controlled trials, retrospective cohort studies, and case series in peer-reviewed journals. Language limited to English. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used to evaluate mortality outcome. Subgroup analyses and linear regression were performed to ascertain the association between mortality pre-specified factors. Data of 1062 patients received peritoneal drainage and 2185 patients received peritoneal laparotomy from five case series, five retrospective cohort studies, and three randomized controlled trials. Peritoneal drainage caused similar mortality (OR 1.49, 95% CI 0.99-2.26) compared with peritoneal laparotomy as initial surgical management for NEC infants. The subgroup analysis of study design, sample size, birth weight, and sex showed similar findings, but inconsistent results were found for country (USA: 1.47, 95% CI 0.90-2.41; Canada: 2.53, 95% CI 0.30-21.48; Australia: 10.29, 95% CI 1.03-102.75; Turkey: 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.63) and gestational age (age mean difference < 3: 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.11; age mean difference ≥ 3: 2.29, 95% CI 1.04-5.05). No statistically significance was found for the linear regression between mortality and sample size (P = 0.842), gestational age (P = 0.287), birth weight (P = 0.257), sex (P = 0.6). Small sample size, high heterogeneity, NEC, and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) had to be analyzed together, lack of selection criteria for the future selection of an intervention, and no clear, standardized procedures. Conclusion: There was no significant difference in mortality between peritoneal drainage and laparotomy as initial surgical intervention. The results suggest that either intervention could be used in selected patients. What is Known: • Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature infants is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and the optimal intervention remains uncertain. What is New: • No significant difference of mortality between peritoneal drainage and laparotomy as initial surgical intervention.
新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)与高发病率和死亡率相关,其最佳干预措施仍不确定。本研究旨在比较原发性腹腔引流术与原发性剖腹术作为 NEC 初始手术干预的死亡率。检索PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 中截至 2021 年 12 月发表的所有数据。研究对象为患有 NEC 的早产儿。研究集中于原发性腹腔引流术和原发性剖腹术作为初始手术治疗。两种干预措施的死亡率均可用。纳入随机对照试验、回顾性队列研究和同行评议期刊中的病例系列。语言仅限于英语。使用优势比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)评估死亡率结局。进行亚组分析和线性回归以确定死亡率的预期因素之间的关联。从五个病例系列、五个回顾性队列研究和三个随机对照试验中,共有 1062 例患者接受了腹腔引流术,2185 例患者接受了剖腹术。与作为 NEC 婴儿初始手术治疗的剖腹术相比,腹腔引流术引起的死亡率相似(OR 1.49,95%CI 0.99-2.26)。研究设计、样本量、出生体重和性别亚组分析得出了类似的发现,但在国家方面的结果不一致(美国:1.47,95%CI 0.90-2.41;加拿大:2.53,95%CI 0.30-21.48;澳大利亚:10.29,95%CI 1.03-102.75;土耳其:0.09,95%CI 0.01-0.63)和胎龄(平均胎龄差异 <3:1.23,95%CI 0.72-2.11;平均胎龄差异 ≥3:2.29,95%CI 1.04-5.05)。线性回归分析未发现死亡率与样本量(P=0.842)、胎龄(P=0.287)、出生体重(P=0.257)、性别(P=0.6)之间存在统计学意义。由于 NEC 和自发性肠穿孔(SIP)必须与小样本量、高异质性一起进行分析,缺乏对未来干预选择的选择标准,且没有明确、标准化的程序,因此无法进行分析。结论:腹腔引流术与剖腹术作为初始手术干预的死亡率无显著差异。结果表明,两种干预措施都可用于选择的患者。已知:•新生儿坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)与高发病率和死亡率相关,其最佳干预措施仍不确定。新发现:•腹腔引流术与剖腹术作为初始手术干预的死亡率无显著差异。