• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于网络的应对疫苗错误信息的公共卫生干预措施:分析学习者参与度及对疫苗接种犹豫影响的方案

A Web-Based Public Health Intervention for Addressing Vaccine Misinformation: Protocol for Analyzing Learner Engagement and Impacts on the Hesitancy to Vaccinate.

作者信息

Powell Leigh, Nour Radwa, Zidoun Youness, Kaladhara Sreelekshmi, Al Suwaidi Hanan, Zary Nabil

机构信息

Institute for Excellence in Health Professions Education, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

College of Medicine, Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 30;11(5):e38034. doi: 10.2196/38034.

DOI:10.2196/38034
PMID:35451967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9153907/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A barrier to successful COVID-19 vaccine campaigns is the ongoing misinformation pandemic, or infodemic, which is contributing to vaccine hesitancy. Web-based population health interventions have been shown to impact health behaviors positively. For web-based interventions to be successful, they must use effective learning design strategies that seek to address known issues with learner engagement and retention. To know if an intervention successfully addresses vaccine hesitancy, there must be some embedded measure for comparing learners preintervention and postintervention.

OBJECTIVE

This protocol aims to describe a study on the effectiveness of a web-based population health intervention that is designed to address vaccine misinformation and hesitancy. The study will examine learner analytics to understand what aspects of the learning design for the intervention were effective and implement a validated instrument-the Adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale-to measure if any changes in vaccine hesitancy were observed preintervention and postintervention.

METHODS

We developed a fully web-based population health intervention to help learners identify misinformation concerning COVID-19 and share the science behind vaccinations. Intervention development involves using a design-based research approach to output more effective interventions in which data can be analyzed to improve future health interventions. The study will use a quasi-experimental design in which a pre-post survey will be provided and compared statistically. Learning analytics will also be generated based on the engagement and retention data collected through the intervention to understand what aspects of our learning design are effective.

RESULTS

The web-based intervention was released to the public in September 2021, and data collection is ongoing. No external marketing or advertising has been done to market the course, making our current population of 486 participants our pilot study population. An analysis of this initial population will enable the revision of the intervention, which will then be marketed to a broader audience. Study outcomes are expected to be published by August 2022. We anticipate the release of the revised intervention by May 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

Disseminating accurate information to the public during pandemic situations is vital to contributing to positive health outcomes, such as those among people getting vaccinated. Web-based interventions are valuable, as they can reach people anytime and anywhere. However, web-based interventions must use sound learning design to help incentivize engagement and motivate learners to learn and must provide a means of evaluating the intervention to determine its impact. Our study will examine both the learning design and the effectiveness of the intervention by using the analytics collected within the intervention and a statistical analysis of a validated instrument to determine if learners had a change in vaccine hesitancy as a result of what they learned.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/38034.

摘要

背景

新冠疫苗接种运动取得成功的一个障碍是持续存在的错误信息大流行,即信息疫情,这导致了疫苗犹豫情绪。基于网络的人群健康干预措施已被证明能对健康行为产生积极影响。要使基于网络的干预措施取得成功,就必须采用有效的学习设计策略,以解决学习者参与度和留存率方面已知的问题。为了确定一项干预措施是否成功解决了疫苗犹豫问题,必须有一些嵌入式措施来比较学习者干预前和干预后的情况。

目的

本方案旨在描述一项关于基于网络的人群健康干预措施有效性的研究,该干预措施旨在解决疫苗错误信息和犹豫问题。该研究将检查学习者分析数据,以了解干预措施学习设计的哪些方面是有效的,并使用经过验证的工具——成人疫苗犹豫量表,来衡量干预前和干预后疫苗犹豫情况是否有任何变化。

方法

我们开发了一项完全基于网络的人群健康干预措施,以帮助学习者识别有关新冠病毒的错误信息,并分享疫苗接种背后的科学知识。干预措施的开发采用基于设计的研究方法,以产出更有效的干预措施,对其中的数据进行分析,以改进未来的健康干预措施。该研究将采用准实验设计,提供前后测调查并进行统计比较。还将根据通过干预收集的参与度和留存率数据生成学习分析数据,以了解我们学习设计的哪些方面是有效的。

结果

基于网络的干预措施于2021年9月向公众发布,数据收集工作正在进行中。尚未进行任何外部营销或广告宣传来推广该课程,因此我们目前的486名参与者群体就是我们的试点研究对象。对这一初始群体的分析将有助于对干预措施进行修订,然后将其推广给更广泛的受众。预计研究结果将于2022年8月公布。我们预计修订后的干预措施将于2022年5月发布。

结论

在疫情期间向公众传播准确信息对于促成积极的健康结果至关重要,比如人们接种疫苗的情况。基于网络的干预措施很有价值,因为它们可以随时随地触达人们。然而,基于网络的干预措施必须采用合理的学习设计,以帮助激发参与度并激励学习者学习,并且必须提供评估干预措施以确定其影响的方法。我们的研究将通过使用干预措施中收集的分析数据以及对经过验证的工具进行统计分析,来检查学习设计和干预措施的有效性,以确定学习者是否因所学内容而在疫苗犹豫方面有所改变。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/38034。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/c224ae67c380/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/18603f76c328/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/e7562fb666f9/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/bf8754082bc6/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/4dd18a6a2267/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/c224ae67c380/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/18603f76c328/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/e7562fb666f9/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/bf8754082bc6/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/4dd18a6a2267/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/653c/9153907/c224ae67c380/resprot_v11i5e38034_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
A Web-Based Public Health Intervention for Addressing Vaccine Misinformation: Protocol for Analyzing Learner Engagement and Impacts on the Hesitancy to Vaccinate.一项基于网络的应对疫苗错误信息的公共卫生干预措施:分析学习者参与度及对疫苗接种犹豫影响的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 30;11(5):e38034. doi: 10.2196/38034.
2
A Web-Based Public Health Intervention for Addressing Vaccine Misinformation: Analysis of Learner Engagement and Shift in Hesitancy to Vaccinate.基于网络的公共卫生干预措施,以解决疫苗错误信息问题:学习者参与度分析及疫苗犹豫态度转变。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:463-467. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230173.
3
The effect of a short, animated story-based video on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: A study protocol for an online randomized controlled trial.短篇动画故事类视频对 COVID-19 疫苗犹豫的影响:一项在线随机对照试验研究方案。
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;10:939227. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.939227. eCollection 2022.
4
Understanding the Influence of Web-Based Information, Misinformation, Disinformation, and Reinformation on COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance: Protocol for a Multicomponent Study.了解基于网络的信息、错误信息、虚假信息和再信息对新冠疫苗接受度的影响:一项多成分研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Oct 17;11(10):e41012. doi: 10.2196/41012.
5
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
6
Tough Talks COVID-19 Digital Health Intervention for Vaccine Hesitancy Among Black Young Adults: Protocol for a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness Implementation Randomized Controlled Trial.针对黑人青年成年人疫苗犹豫问题的“艰难对话”COVID-19数字健康干预措施:1型混合有效性实施随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Feb 13;12:e41240. doi: 10.2196/41240.
7
Community-Based Public Health Vaccination Campaign (VaccinateLA) in Los Angeles' Black and Latino Communities: Protocol for a Participatory Study.洛杉矶黑人和拉丁裔社区基于社区的公共卫生疫苗接种运动(VaccinateLA):一项参与性研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Feb 20;12:e40161. doi: 10.2196/40161.
8
Using community influencer groups to address COVID-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in Uganda: a protocol for a prospective quasi-experimental study.利用社区意见领袖团体解决乌干达的 COVID-19 错误信息和疫苗犹豫问题:一项前瞻性准实验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 26;12(8):e057994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057994.
9
A Comprehensive Analysis of COVID-19 Misinformation, Public Health Impacts, and Communication Strategies: Scoping Review.全面分析新冠病毒错误信息、公共卫生影响和传播策略:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 21;26:e56931. doi: 10.2196/56931.
10
Factors Underlying Vaccine Hesitancy and Their Mitigations in Saudi Arabia: Protocol for a Systematic Review.沙特阿拉伯疫苗犹豫的潜在因素及其缓解措施:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 22;13:e54680. doi: 10.2196/54680.

引用本文的文献

1
Immunity Awareness-Strategies to Improve the Degree of Acceptance of Vaccines: A Systematic Review.免疫意识——提高疫苗接受度的策略:一项系统综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jun 7;13(6):618. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13060618.
2
Relationships Between Social Vulnerability and Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccination Coverage and Vaccine Effectiveness.社会脆弱性与 2019 年冠状病毒病疫苗接种覆盖率和疫苗有效性之间的关系。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 May 3;76(9):1615-1625. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad003.

本文引用的文献

1
Modification of a vaccine hesitancy scale for use in adult vaccinations in the United States and China.疫苗犹豫量表的修订版,用于美国和中国的成人疫苗接种。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Aug 3;17(8):2639-2646. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2021.1884476. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
2
The Infodemic within the Pandemic.疫情中的信息疫情。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Mar;22(3):517-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.12.044. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
3
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
4
Public health education for parents during the outbreak of COVID-19: a rapid review.2019年冠状病毒病疫情期间针对家长的公共卫生教育:快速综述
Ann Transl Med. 2020 May;8(10):628. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-3312.
5
Quasi-Experimental Design (Pre-Test and Post-Test Studies) in Prehospital and Disaster Research.院前与灾害研究中的准实验设计(前测与后测研究)
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Dec;34(6):573-574. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X19005053.
6
Addressing Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media.应对社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息。
JAMA. 2018 Dec 18;320(23):2417-2418. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.16865.
7
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
8
Association between Australian Hajj Pilgrims' awareness of MERS-CoV, and their compliance with preventive measures and exposure to camels.澳大利亚朝觐者对中东呼吸综合征冠状病毒(MERS-CoV)的认知、其对预防措施的遵守情况以及与骆驼接触情况之间的关联。
J Travel Med. 2016 Jul 18;23(5). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taw046. Print 2016 May.
9
Measuring vaccine hesitancy: The development of a survey tool.衡量疫苗犹豫程度:一种调查工具的开发
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4165-75. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.037. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
10
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants.疫苗犹豫:定义、范围及决定因素
Vaccine. 2015 Aug 14;33(34):4161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Apr 17.