Heidelberg Institute of Global Health (HIGH), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Institute for Global Food Security (IGFS), Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Front Public Health. 2022 Aug 23;10:939227. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.939227. eCollection 2022.
INTRODUCTION: Exposure to a high volume of vaccine misinformation on social media can have a negative effect on vaccine confidence and rates. To counteract misinformation, we designed a collage of three short, animated story-based (SAS) videos to convey scientifically informed and accessible information about COVID-19 vaccine applicable to a social media context. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct an online randomized controlled trial primarily to: (1) determine the effectiveness of SAS videos in improving COVID-19 vaccine knowledge; (2) evaluate the effectiveness of SAS videos in increasing behavioral intent for COVID-19 vaccination; and (3) quantify people's interest in watching SAS videos about the COVID-19 vaccine. We also aim to identify barriers and facilitators to COIVD-19 vaccinations that have been shown to minimize vaccine hesitancy between vaccinated and unvaccinated populations. Using a web-based recruitment platform, a total of 10,000 adults from the United States will be recruited and randomly assigned to (1) a SAS video collage arm, (2) an attention placebo control video arm, or (3) no intervention arm (1:1:1). Furthermore, we will measure behavioral intent to obtain information on vaccination regarding COVID-19. At the end of the trial, participants randomized to arm 2 and arm 3 will be given the option of watching one of the intervention videos voluntarily to assess participant engagement with SAS videos. Finally, we will assess individual factors associated with vaccine hesitancy - hope, optimism, COVID-19 perceived risks and benefits, self-efficacy, perceived social norms, and trust - and compare vaccinated and unvaccinated participants across the three arms. DISCUSSIONS: Evidence-based information from official channels can be complex and inaccessible to the general public, whereas false information on social media is frequently shared in brief postings, images, or videos that can easily reach the general public, thereby rapidly disseminating (mis-)information. To avoid the spread of misinformation, social media may be used to deliver evidence-based and emotionally compelling information in a readily accessible format in order to pre-empt misinformation. Our findings may help inform future SAS efforts addressing COVID-19 and other important public health challenges. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the Heidelberg University Hospital's Ethics Committee (S-163/2022). The trial was registered with German Clinical Trials Register (www.drks.de) on 5 January 2022: number DRKS00027938. Findings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific publications and possibly presented at scientific conferences.
简介:在社交媒体上接触大量疫苗错误信息会对疫苗信心和接种率产生负面影响。为了抵制错误信息,我们设计了一个由三个简短的、基于动画故事的(SAS)视频组成的拼贴画,以传达适用于社交媒体背景的关于 COVID-19 疫苗的科学知情和易懂的信息。
方法与分析:我们将主要进行一项在线随机对照试验:(1)确定 SAS 视频在提高 COVID-19 疫苗知识方面的有效性;(2)评估 SAS 视频在增加 COVID-19 疫苗接种行为意向方面的有效性;(3)量化人们观看关于 COVID-19 疫苗的 SAS 视频的兴趣。我们还旨在确定已被证明可以最大限度地减少已接种和未接种人群之间疫苗犹豫的 COVID-19 疫苗接种的障碍和促进因素。使用基于网络的招募平台,我们将从美国招募总计 10000 名成年人,并将他们随机分配到(1)SAS 视频拼贴画臂、(2)注意力安慰剂对照视频臂或(3)无干预臂(1:1:1)。此外,我们将测量行为意向以获取有关 COVID-19 疫苗接种的信息。在试验结束时,随机分配到臂 2 和臂 3 的参与者将有机会自愿观看干预视频之一,以评估参与者对 SAS 视频的参与度。最后,我们将评估与疫苗犹豫相关的个体因素-希望、乐观、COVID-19 感知风险和益处、自我效能、感知社会规范和信任-并比较三个臂中的已接种和未接种参与者。
讨论:来自官方渠道的循证信息可能对公众来说复杂且难以理解,而社交媒体上的虚假信息则经常以简短的帖子、图像或视频形式分享,这些信息很容易被公众看到,从而迅速传播(错误)信息。为了避免错误信息的传播,可以使用社交媒体以易于理解的格式提供基于证据的、情感上引人注目的信息,以预先阻止错误信息。我们的研究结果可能有助于为未来解决 COVID-19 和其他重要公共卫生挑战的 SAS 工作提供信息。
伦理与传播:该研究得到了海德堡大学医院伦理委员会的批准(S-163/2022)。该试验于 2022 年 1 月 5 日在德国临床试验注册处(www.drks.de)注册:编号 DRKS00027938。该研究的结果将发表在同行评议的科学出版物中,并可能在科学会议上展示。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021-7-27
Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2020-3-23
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021-7-27
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021-6-22