Department of General Dentistry, Creighton University School of Dentistry, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Department of Operative Dentistry, University of Iowa College or Dentistry, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2022 Jun;130(3):e12864. doi: 10.1111/eos.12864. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
To examine the effect of mold enclosure and chisel design on macro shear fatigue bond strengths of dental adhesive systems. The fatigue bond strength testing was conducted with two commercially available dental adhesive systems, (1) OptiBond eXTRa and (2) Scotchbond Universal, for bonding a resin composite (Filtek Supreme Ultra) to both enamel and dentin using a mold enclosure and a non-mold enclosure with a knife-edge and two sized notched-edge chisel assemblies for loading. As a loading reference for the fatigue testing, macro shear bond strengths of the adhesive systems to enamel and dentin were conducted using a mold enclosure and a knife-edge chisel assembly. The shear bond strengths with the mold enclosure using knife-edge chisel assembly did not exhibit a significant difference between the adhesive systems for either enamel or dentin. The fatigue bond strengths of bonded specimens demonstrated significant differences when comparing the mold enclosure and non-mold enclosure, but not between knife-edge and notched-edge chisel assemblies. The fatigue bond strengths of dental adhesive systems demonstrated significantly higher values when using mold-enclosed bonded specimens than a non-mold enclosure, regardless of type of chisel assembly.
为了研究模具封闭和凿子设计对牙科粘接系统宏观剪切疲劳粘结强度的影响。采用两种市售的牙科粘接系统(1)OptiBond eXTRa 和(2)Scotchbond Universal,通过模具封闭和无模具封闭以及带有刀刃的和两种尺寸的带缺口边缘凿子组件进行加载,对牙齿的牙釉质和牙本质进行了疲劳粘结强度测试。作为疲劳测试的加载参考,使用模具封闭和刀刃式凿子组件对牙釉质和牙本质进行了粘接系统的宏观剪切粘结强度测试。使用刀刃式凿子组件的模具封闭的剪切粘结强度在牙釉质和牙本质之间的粘接系统之间没有显著差异。比较模具封闭和非模具封闭时,粘结试件的疲劳粘结强度表现出显著差异,但刀刃式和带缺口边缘凿子组件之间没有差异。使用模具封闭的粘结试件的牙科粘接系统的疲劳粘结强度明显高于非模具封闭,无论使用哪种类型的凿子组件。