Centre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, QLD 4878, Australia.
Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 22;8(16):eabm5944. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm5944.
Dogs are uniquely associated with human dispersal and bring transformational insight into the domestication process. Dingoes represent an intriguing case within canine evolution being geographically isolated for thousands of years. Here, we present a high-quality de novo assembly of a pure dingo (CanFam_DDS). We identified large chromosomal differences relative to the current dog reference (CanFam3.1) and confirmed no expanded pancreatic amylase gene as found in breed dogs. Phylogenetic analyses using variant pairwise matrices show that the dingo is distinct from five breed dogs with 100% bootstrap support when using Greenland wolf as the outgroup. Functionally, we observe differences in methylation patterns between the dingo and German shepherd dog genomes and differences in serum biochemistry and microbiome makeup. Our results suggest that distinct demographic and environmental conditions have shaped the dingo genome. In contrast, artificial human selection has likely shaped the genomes of domestic breed dogs after divergence from the dingo.
狗与人类的扩散密切相关,为我们深入了解驯化过程带来了新的视角。澳洲野犬在犬类进化中是一个有趣的案例,它们在数千年的时间里与其他犬类群体地理隔离。在这里,我们展示了一个高质量的纯澳洲野犬(CanFam_DDS)从头组装基因组。与目前的犬类参考基因组(CanFam3.1)相比,我们发现了大量的染色体差异,并证实了与品种犬不同的是,澳洲野犬没有扩增的胰淀粉酶基因。使用变异成对矩阵的系统发育分析表明,当以格陵兰狼为外群时,澳洲野犬与五种品种犬的分支差异得到了 100%的支持。功能上,我们观察到澳洲野犬和德国牧羊犬基因组之间的甲基化模式存在差异,以及血清生化和微生物组组成的差异。我们的研究结果表明,不同的人口和环境条件塑造了澳洲野犬的基因组。相比之下,人工选择可能在澳洲野犬分化为家犬品种后,塑造了它们的基因组。