Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
The Environment Institute, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jul 23;121(30):e2407584121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2407584121. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
Dingoes are culturally and ecologically important free-living canids whose ancestors arrived in Australia over 3,000 B.P., likely transported by seafaring people. However, the early history of dingoes in Australia-including the number of founding populations and their routes of introduction-remains uncertain. This uncertainty arises partly from the complex and poorly understood relationship between modern dingoes and New Guinea singing dogs, and suspicions that post-Colonial hybridization has introduced recent domestic dog ancestry into the genomes of many wild dingo populations. In this study, we analyzed genome-wide data from nine ancient dingo specimens ranging in age from 400 to 2,746 y old, predating the introduction of domestic dogs to Australia by European colonists. We uncovered evidence that the continent-wide population structure observed in modern dingo populations had already emerged several thousand years ago. We also detected excess allele sharing between New Guinea singing dogs and ancient dingoes from coastal New South Wales (NSW) compared to ancient dingoes from southern Australia, irrespective of any post-Colonial hybrid ancestry in the genomes of modern individuals. Our results are consistent with several demographic scenarios, including a scenario where the ancestry of dingoes from the east coast of Australia results from at least two waves of migration from source populations with varying affinities to New Guinea singing dogs. We also contribute to the growing body of evidence that modern dingoes derive little genomic ancestry from post-Colonial hybridization with other domestic dog lineages, instead descending primarily from ancient canids introduced to Sahul thousands of years ago.
袋狼是具有文化和生态重要性的自由生活的犬科动物,其祖先可追溯到公元前 3000 年左右,可能是由航海者带到澳大利亚的。然而,袋狼在澳大利亚的早期历史——包括起源种群的数量及其传入途径——仍然不确定。这种不确定性部分源于现代袋狼与新几内亚歌唱犬之间复杂且尚未被充分理解的关系,以及人们怀疑殖民后杂交已经将近期的家犬血统引入了许多野生袋狼种群的基因组中。在这项研究中,我们分析了来自 9 个古代袋狼样本的全基因组数据,这些样本的年龄在 400 到 2746 年之间,早于欧洲殖民者将家犬引入澳大利亚。我们发现的证据表明,现代袋狼种群中观察到的全大陆种群结构早在几千年前就已经出现了。我们还检测到新几内亚歌唱犬与来自新南威尔士州(NSW)沿海地区的古代袋狼之间存在过多的等位基因共享,而与来自澳大利亚南部的古代袋狼相比则不存在这种情况,无论现代个体的基因组中是否存在殖民后杂交的血统。我们的结果与几种人口统计情景一致,包括一种情景表明,澳大利亚东海岸的袋狼的祖先至少来自两个具有不同与新几内亚歌唱犬亲缘关系的源种群的迁徙浪潮。我们的研究结果还为越来越多的证据提供了支持,这些证据表明现代袋狼很少从与其他家犬谱系的殖民后杂交中获得基因组血统,而是主要源自数千年前引入萨赫尔地区的古代犬科动物。