• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Valuing Diversity and Inclusion in Health Care to Equip the Workforce: Survey Study and Pathway Analysis.重视医疗保健领域的多样性与包容性以培养专业人才:调查研究与路径分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 6;6(5):e34808. doi: 10.2196/34808.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Digital Orientation of Health Systems in the Post-COVID-19 "New Normal" in the United States: Cross-sectional Survey.美国后 COVID-19“新常态”下的卫生系统数字化定位:横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 16;23(8):e30453. doi: 10.2196/30453.
6
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
7
Competition and Integration of US Health Systems in the Post-COVID-19 New Normal: Cross-sectional Survey.新冠疫情后新常态下美国卫生系统的竞争与整合:横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 24;6(3):e32477. doi: 10.2196/32477.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Integration vs Collaborative Redesign Strategies of Health Systems' Supply Chains in the Post-COVID-19 New Normal: Cross-sectional Survey Across the United States.新冠疫情后新常态下卫生系统供应链的整合与协同重新设计策略:美国全国横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):e35317. doi: 10.2196/35317.
10
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Broadening Inclusion of Primary Care: Trainee Insights and Commentary on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.扩大初级保健的包容性:实习生对多样性、公平性和包容性的见解与评论
Ann Fam Med. 2025 May 27;23(3):277-280. doi: 10.1370/afm.250234.
2
Embracing Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (IDEA): Cultivating understanding internally to foster external change.拥抱包容、多元、公平与机会(IDEA):在内部培养理解以促进外部变革。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Mar;48(2):161-169. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2426312. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
3
Exploring cultural competence barriers in the primary care sexual and reproductive health centres in Catalonia, Spain: perspectives from immigrant women and healthcare providers.探讨西班牙加泰罗尼亚初级保健性与生殖健康中心的文化能力障碍:移民妇女和医疗保健提供者的观点。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Oct 9;23(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02290-5.
4
15 Years of Inclusive Employment in a Down Syndrome Clinic.15 年唐氏综合征诊所的包容性就业。
Work. 2024;79(3):1517-1523. doi: 10.3233/WOR-240080.
5
Effect and outcome of equity, diversity and inclusion programs in healthcare institutions: a systematic review protocol.医疗机构中的公平、多样性和包容性计划的效果和结果:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 18;14(4):e085007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085007.
6
Strength in Numbers: A SWOT Analysis of Plastic Surgery.人多势众:整形手术的SWOT分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Dec 14;11(12):e5462. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005462. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
An Introduction to Faculty Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for Excellence in Nurse Education: Literature Review.《护理教育卓越之师资多元化、公平与包容导论:文献综述》
Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2023 Dec 1;7:e49231. doi: 10.2196/49231.
8
A Systematic review protocol on workplace equality and inclusion practices in the healthcare sector.系统评价:医疗保健行业中工作场所平等与包容实践
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 20;13(3):e064939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064939.

本文引用的文献

1
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Nursing: The Pathway to Excellence Framework Alignment.护理领域的多样性、公平性与包容性:卓越之路框架对齐
Nurs Adm Q. 2021;45(4):311-323. doi: 10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000494.
2
Addressing Workforce Diversity - A Quality-Improvement Framework.应对劳动力多样性——一个质量改进框架。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 25;384(12):1083-1086. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2032224. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
3
A Roadmap for Diversity in Medicine During the Age of COVID-19 and George Floyd.新冠疫情和乔治·弗洛伊德时代医学领域的多元化路线图。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Apr;36(4):1089-1091. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06430-9. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Interprofessional education and collaborative practice research during the COVID-19 pandemic: Considerations to advance the field.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的跨专业教育与协作实践研究:推动该领域发展的考量因素
J Interprof Care. 2020 Sep-Oct;34(5):583-586. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1807481. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
5
Risk factors associated with academic difficulty in an Australian regionally located medical school.与澳大利亚地区性医学院学习困难相关的风险因素。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1095-9.
6
The Effects of Race and Racial Concordance on Patient-Physician Communication: A Systematic Review of the Literature.种族和种族一致性对医患沟通的影响:文献系统评价。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Feb;5(1):117-140. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0350-4. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
7
The evolution and future of diversity at work.工作多样性的演变和未来。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):483-499. doi: 10.1037/apl0000161. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
8
Fostering team creativity: perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity's potential.促进团队创造力:换位思考是挖掘多样性潜力的关键。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):982-96. doi: 10.1037/a0029159. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
9
The contribution of international medical graduates to diversity in the U.S. physician workforce: graduate medical education.国际医学毕业生对美国医师劳动力多样性的贡献:毕业后医学教育。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008 May;19(2):493-9. doi: 10.1353/hpu.0.0015.
10
Religious characteristics of U.S. physicians: a national survey.美国医生的宗教特征:一项全国性调查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jul;20(7):629-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0119.x.

重视医疗保健领域的多样性与包容性以培养专业人才:调查研究与路径分析

Valuing Diversity and Inclusion in Health Care to Equip the Workforce: Survey Study and Pathway Analysis.

作者信息

Khuntia Jiban, Ning Xue, Cascio Wayne, Stacey Rulon

机构信息

Health Administration Research Consortium, Business School, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, United States.

Business Department, University of Wisconsin Parkside, Kenosha, WI, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 6;6(5):e34808. doi: 10.2196/34808.

DOI:10.2196/34808
PMID:35452404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9123548/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic, with all its virus variants, remains a serious situation. Health systems across the United States are trying their best to respond. On average, the health care workforce is relatively homogenous, even though it cares for a highly diverse array of patients. This perennial problem in the US health care workforce has only been accentuated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical workers should reflect on the variety of patients they care for and strive to understand their mindsets within the larger contexts of culture, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, and socioeconomic realities. Along with talent and skills, diversity and inclusion (D&I) are essential for maintaining a workforce that can treat the myriad needs and populations that health systems serve. Developing hiring strategies that will help achieve greater workforce diversity remains a challenge for health system leaders.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aims of this study were to: (1) explore the characteristics of US health systems and their associations with D&I practices and benefits, (2) examine the associations between D&I practices and three pathways to equip workforces, and (3) examine the associations between the three pathways to better equip workforces and business and service benefits. The three pathways are: (1) improving D&I among existing employees (IMPROVE), (2) using multiple channels to find and recruit the workforce (RECRUIT), and (3) collaborating with universities to find new talent and establish plans to train students (COLLABORATE).

METHODS

During February to March 2021, 625 health systems in the United States were surveyed with the help of a consultant, 135 (21.6%) of whom responded. We assessed workforce talent- and diversity-relevant factors. We collected secondary data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Compendium of the US Health Systems, leading to a matched data set of 124 health systems for analysis. We first explored differences in diversity practices and benefits across the health systems. We then examined the relationships among diversity practices, pathways, and benefits.

RESULTS

Health system characteristics such as size, location, ownership, teaching, and revenue have varying associations with diversity practices and outcomes. D&I and talent strategies exhibited different associations with the three workforce pathways. Regarding the mediating effects, the IMPROVE pathway seems to be more effective than the RECRUIT and COLLABORATE pathways, enabling the diversity strategy to prompt business or service benefits. Moreover, these pathway effects go hand-in-hand with a talent strategy, indicating that both talent and diversity strategies need to be aligned to achieve the best results for a health system.

CONCLUSIONS

Diversity and talent plans can be aligned to realize multiple desired benefits for health systems. However, a one-size-fits-all approach is not a viable strategy for improving D&I. Health systems need to follow a multipronged approach based on their characteristics. To get D&I right, proactive plans and genuine efforts are essential.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情及其所有病毒变种仍然是一个严峻的形势。美国各地的卫生系统都在尽最大努力应对。平均而言,医疗保健劳动力相对同质化,尽管其照顾的患者种类繁多。美国医疗保健劳动力中的这个长期存在的问题在新冠疫情期间只是被进一步加剧了。医护人员应该反思他们所照顾的患者的多样性,并努力在文化、性别、性取向、宗教信仰和社会经济现实等更广泛的背景下理解他们的思维方式。除了人才和技能,多样性和包容性(D&I)对于维持一支能够满足卫生系统所服务的众多需求和人群的劳动力队伍至关重要。制定有助于实现更大劳动力多样性的招聘策略,仍然是卫生系统领导者面临的一项挑战。

目的

本研究的主要目的是:(1)探索美国卫生系统的特征及其与多样性和包容性实践及益处的关联;(2)研究多样性和包容性实践与三种劳动力培养途径之间的关联;(3)研究三种更好地培养劳动力的途径与业务和服务益处之间的关联。这三种途径是:(1)提高现有员工的多样性和包容性(改进);(2)利用多种渠道寻找和招聘劳动力(招聘);(3)与大学合作寻找新人才并制定学生培训计划(合作)。

方法

在2021年2月至3月期间,在美国一家咨询公司的帮助下,对625个美国卫生系统进行了调查,其中135个(21.6%)做出了回应。我们评估了与劳动力人才和多样性相关的因素。我们从医疗保健研究与质量局的美国卫生系统纲要中收集了二手数据,从而得到了一个由124个卫生系统组成的匹配数据集用于分析。我们首先探讨了各卫生系统在多样性实践和益处方面的差异。然后我们研究了多样性实践、途径和益处之间的关系。

结果

卫生系统的特征,如规模、位置、所有权性质、教学情况和收入等,与多样性实践和结果有着不同的关联。多样性和包容性以及人才战略与三种劳动力培养途径表现出不同的关联。关于中介效应,“改进”途径似乎比“招聘”和“合作”途径更有效,能使多样性战略带来业务或服务益处。此外,这些途径效应与人才战略相辅相成,这表明人才战略和多样性战略都需要保持一致,才能为卫生系统实现最佳效果。

结论

多样性和人才计划可以保持一致,为卫生系统实现多重预期益处。然而,一刀切的方法并非改善多样性和包容性的可行策略。卫生系统需要根据自身特征采取多管齐下的方法。要正确实现多样性和包容性,积极主动的计划和切实的努力至关重要。