• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习开发并验证疑似脓毒症患者的院内死亡率预测模型。

Using Machine Learning to Develop and Validate an In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Model for Patients with Suspected Sepsis.

作者信息

Chao Hsiao-Yun, Wu Chin-Chieh, Singh Avichandra, Shedd Andrew, Wolfshohl Jon, Chou Eric H, Huang Yhu-Chering, Chen Kuan-Fu

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5, Fu-Shin Street, Gueishan Village, Taoyuan 333423, Taiwan.

Clinical Informatics and Medical Statistics Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2022 Mar 29;10(4):802. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10040802.

DOI:10.3390/biomedicines10040802
PMID:35453552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9030924/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early recognition of sepsis and the prediction of mortality in patients with infection are important. This multi-center, ED-based study aimed to develop and validate a 28-day mortality prediction model for patients with infection using various machine learning (ML) algorithms.

METHODS

Patients with acute infection requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment during the first 24 h of admission were prospectively recruited. Patient demographics, comorbidities, clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory test data, selected sepsis-related novel biomarkers, and 28-day mortality were collected and divided into training (70%) and testing (30%) datasets. Logistic regression and seven ML algorithms were used to develop the prediction models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare different models.

RESULTS

A total of 555 patients were recruited with a full panel of biomarker tests. Among them, 18% fulfilled Sepsis-3 criteria, with a 28-day mortality rate of 8%. The wrapper algorithm selected 30 features, including disease severity scores, biochemical parameters, and conventional and few sepsis-related biomarkers. Random forest outperformed other ML models (AUROC: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.98) and SOFA and early warning scores (AUROC: 0.64-0.84) in the prediction of 28-day mortality in patients with infection. Additionally, random forest remained the best-performing model, with an AUROC of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.91-0.98, = 0.725) after removing five sepsis-related novel biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that ML models provide a more accurate prediction of 28-day mortality with an enhanced ability in dealing with multi-dimensional data than the logistic regression model.

摘要

背景

早期识别脓毒症以及预测感染患者的死亡率至关重要。这项基于急诊科的多中心研究旨在使用各种机器学习(ML)算法开发并验证一种针对感染患者的28天死亡率预测模型。

方法

前瞻性招募入院后首24小时内需要静脉使用抗生素治疗的急性感染患者。收集患者的人口统计学资料、合并症、临床症状和体征、实验室检查数据、选定的脓毒症相关新型生物标志物以及28天死亡率,并将其分为训练集(70%)和测试集(30%)。使用逻辑回归和七种ML算法来开发预测模型。采用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)比较不同模型。

结果

共招募了555例患者并进行了全面的生物标志物检测。其中,18%符合脓毒症-3标准,28天死亡率为8%。包装算法选择了30个特征,包括疾病严重程度评分、生化参数以及传统和少数脓毒症相关生物标志物。在预测感染患者的28天死亡率方面,随机森林模型优于其他ML模型(AUROC:0.96;95%置信区间:0.93 - 0.98)以及序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和早期预警评分(AUROC:0.64 - 0.84)。此外,在去除五个脓毒症相关新型生物标志物后,随机森林仍然是表现最佳的模型,AUROC为0.95(95%CI:0.91 - 0.98,Z = 0.725)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与逻辑回归模型相比,ML模型在处理多维度数据方面能力更强,能更准确地预测28天死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f669/9030924/4dd3c350f559/biomedicines-10-00802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f669/9030924/a69a7c41d684/biomedicines-10-00802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f669/9030924/4dd3c350f559/biomedicines-10-00802-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f669/9030924/a69a7c41d684/biomedicines-10-00802-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f669/9030924/4dd3c350f559/biomedicines-10-00802-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Using Machine Learning to Develop and Validate an In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Model for Patients with Suspected Sepsis.利用机器学习开发并验证疑似脓毒症患者的院内死亡率预测模型。
Biomedicines. 2022 Mar 29;10(4):802. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10040802.
2
Machine learning algorithms for early sepsis detection in the emergency department: A retrospective study.机器学习算法在急诊科早期脓毒症检测中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104689. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
3
[Comparison of machine learning method and logistic regression model in prediction of acute kidney injury in severely burned patients].[机器学习方法与逻辑回归模型在预测重度烧伤患者急性肾损伤中的比较]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 20;34(6):343-348. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.006.
4
Development and Validation of a Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment-Based Machine-Learning Model for Mortality Prediction in Patients with Suspected Infection in the Emergency Department.基于快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估的机器学习模型在急诊科疑似感染患者死亡率预测中的开发与验证
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 23;9(3):875. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030875.
5
Prediction of In-hospital Mortality in Emergency Department Patients With Sepsis: A Local Big Data-Driven, Machine Learning Approach.急诊科脓毒症患者院内死亡率的预测:一种基于本地大数据驱动的机器学习方法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;23(3):269-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.12876. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
6
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
7
Mortality prediction for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome based on machine learning: a population-based study.基于机器学习的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡率预测:一项基于人群的研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 May;9(9):794. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6624.
8
Development and validation of a novel blending machine learning model for hospital mortality prediction in ICU patients with Sepsis.一种用于预测脓毒症重症监护病房患者医院死亡率的新型混合机器学习模型的开发与验证
BioData Min. 2021 Aug 16;14(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13040-021-00276-5.
9
SAPS III is superior to SOFA for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients based on Sepsis 3.0 criteria.基于 Sepsis 3.0 标准,SAPS III 比 SOFA 更能预测脓毒症患者 28 天死亡率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach.利用最少电子健康记录数据预测重症监护病房中的脓毒症:一种机器学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Sep 30;4(3):e28. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5909.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpretable machine learning model for early morbidity risk prediction in patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: a multi-center study.用于脓毒症诱导的凝血病患者早期发病风险预测的可解释机器学习模型:一项多中心研究。
Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 3;16:1552265. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1552265. eCollection 2025.
2
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia.一种用于预测呼吸机相关性肺炎重症监护病房患者院内死亡率的可解释机器学习模型。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 7;20(1):e0316526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316526. eCollection 2025.
3
Advancements in Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Medicine in Taiwan: A Narrative Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
2
From Local Explanations to Global Understanding with Explainable AI for Trees.利用可解释人工智能实现从局部解释到树木的全局理解
Nat Mach Intell. 2020 Jan;2(1):56-67. doi: 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-9. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Prognostic values of SOFA score, qSOFA score, and LODS score for patients with sepsis.
台湾急诊医学领域人工智能的进展:一项叙述性综述
J Acute Med. 2024 Mar 1;14(1):9-19. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202403_14(1).0002.
4
Conventional and unconventional T-cell responses contribute to the prediction of clinical outcome and causative bacterial pathogen in sepsis patients.常规和非常规 T 细胞反应有助于预测脓毒症患者的临床结果和致病细菌病原体。
Clin Exp Immunol. 2024 May 16;216(3):293-306. doi: 10.1093/cei/uxae019.
5
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis-related death: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器学习在脓毒症相关死亡预测中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02383-1.
序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分和逻辑器官功能障碍评分(LODS)对脓毒症患者的预后价值。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 May;9(3):1037-1044. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-984.
4
Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.2009 年至 2019 年期间欧洲、北美和澳大利亚脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Crit Care. 2020 May 19;24(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-02950-2.
5
Clinical-learning versus machine-learning for transdiagnostic prediction of psychosis onset in individuals at-risk.临床学习与机器学习在风险个体精神病发病的跨诊断预测中的比较。
Transl Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 17;9(1):259. doi: 10.1038/s41398-019-0600-9.
6
Describing organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit: a cohort study of 20,000 patients.描述重症监护病房中的器官功能障碍:一项涉及 20000 名患者的队列研究。
Crit Care. 2019 May 23;23(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2459-9.
7
Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery.用于预防手术期间低氧血症的可解释机器学习预测。
Nat Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;2(10):749-760. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Serum albumin as a risk factor for death in patients with prolonged sepsis: An observational study.血清白蛋白作为延长脓毒症患者死亡的风险因素:一项观察性研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Jun;51:139-144. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
9
Prediction of sepsis patients using machine learning approach: A meta-analysis.基于机器学习的脓毒症患者预测:一项荟萃分析。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Mar;170:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.12.027. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
10
Effectiveness of Treatments and Diagnostic Tools and Declining Mortality in Patients With Severe Sepsis: A 12-Year Population-Based Cohort Study.严重脓毒症患者治疗和诊断工具的有效性和死亡率的降低:一项长达 12 年的基于人群的队列研究。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1418-1425. doi: 10.1177/0885066619827270. Epub 2019 Jan 30.