Chen Chih-Hao, Huang Chii-Yuan, Cheng Hsiu-Lien, Lin Heng-Yu Haley, Chu Yuan-Chia, Chang Chun-Yu, Lai Ying-Hui, Wang Mao-Che, Cheng Yen-Fu
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Faculty of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 13;12(4):972. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040972.
Traditional otoscopy has some limitations, including poor visualization and inadequate time for evaluation in suboptimal environments. Smartphone-enabled otoscopy may improve examination quality and serve as a potential diagnostic tool for middle ear diseases using a telemedicine approach. The main objectives are to compare the correctness of smartphone-enabled otoscopy and traditional otoscopy and to evaluate the diagnostic confidence of the examiner via meta-analysis. From inception through 20 January 2022, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched. Studies comparing smartphone-enabled otoscopy with traditional otoscopy regarding the outcome of interest were eligible. The relative risk (RR) for the rate of correctness in diagnosing ear conditions and the standardized mean difference (SMD) in diagnostic confidence were extracted. Sensitivity analysis and trial sequential analyses (TSAs) were conducted to further examine the pooled results. Study quality was evaluated by using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool 2. Consequently, a total of 1840 examinees were divided into the smartphone-enabled otoscopy group and the traditional otoscopy group. Overall, the pooled result showed that smartphone-enabled otoscopy was associated with higher correctness than traditional otoscopy (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.51; = 0.01; = 70.0%). Consistently significant associations were also observed in the analysis after excluding the simulation study (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.21; = 0.04; = 0%) and normal ear conditions (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.40; = 0.04; = 65.0%). For the confidence of examiners using both otoscopy methods, the pooled result was nonsignificant between the smartphone-enabled otoscopy and traditional otoscopy groups (SMD, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.40; = 0.61; = 16.3%). In conclusion, smartphone-enabled otoscopy was associated with a higher rate of correctness in the detection of middle ear diseases, and in patients with otologic complaints, the use of smartphone-enabled otoscopy may be considered. More large-scale studies should be performed to consolidate the results.
传统耳镜检查存在一些局限性,包括可视化效果差以及在欠佳环境中评估时间不足。启用智能手机的耳镜检查可能会提高检查质量,并可作为使用远程医疗方法诊断中耳疾病的潜在工具。主要目的是通过荟萃分析比较启用智能手机的耳镜检查和传统耳镜检查的正确性,并评估检查者的诊断信心。从开始到2022年1月20日,检索了Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science和Scopus数据库。比较启用智能手机的耳镜检查与传统耳镜检查在感兴趣结果方面的研究符合要求。提取了诊断耳部疾病正确性的相对风险(RR)和诊断信心的标准化平均差(SMD)。进行了敏感性分析和试验序贯分析(TSA)以进一步检查汇总结果。使用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具2评估研究质量。因此,共有1840名受试者被分为启用智能手机的耳镜检查组和传统耳镜检查组。总体而言,汇总结果表明,启用智能手机的耳镜检查比传统耳镜检查具有更高的正确性(RR,为1.26;95%CI,为1.06至1.51;P = 0.01;I² = 70.0%)。在排除模拟研究(RR,为1.10;95%CI,为1.00至1.21;P = 0.04;I² = 0%)和正常耳部情况(RR,为1.18;95%CI,为1.01至1.40;P = 0.04;I² = 65.0%)后的分析中也观察到一致的显著关联。对于使用两种耳镜检查方法的检查者的信心,启用智能手机的耳镜检查组和传统耳镜检查组之间的汇总结果无显著差异(SMD,为0.08;95%CI,为 -0.24至0.40;P = 0.61;I² = 16.3%)。总之,启用智能手机的耳镜检查在检测中耳疾病方面具有更高的正确率,对于有耳部不适主诉的患者,可以考虑使用启用智能手机的耳镜检查。应进行更多大规模研究以巩固结果。