Chair of Neuroanatomy, Institute of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Research Unit, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Task Force "Future of Professional Football", DFL Deutsche Fussball Liga, Frankfurt, Germany.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 7;16(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02853-0.
To compare lay-off times achieved by treating acute muscle injuries in elite football players with a multimodal therapy approach that includes a specific protocol of almost daily radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) with corresponding data reported in the literature.
We performed a retrospective analysis of treatments and recovery times of muscle injuries suffered by the players of an elite football team competing in the first/second German Bundesliga during one of the previous seasons.
A total of 20 acute muscle injuries were diagnosed and treated in the aforementioned season, of which eight (40%) were diagnosed as Type 1a/muscular tightness injuries, five (25%) as Type 2b/muscle strain injuries, four (20%) as Type 3a/partial muscle tear injuries and three (15%) as contusions. All injuries were treated with the previously mentioned multimodal therapy approach. Compared with data reported by Ekstrand et al. (Br J Sports Med 47:769-774, 2013), lay-off times (median/mean) were shortened by 54% and 58%, respectively, in the case of Type 1a injuries, by 50% and 55%, respectively, in the case of Type 2b injuries as well as by 8% and 21%, respectively, in the case of Type 3a injuries. No adverse reactions were observed.
Overall, the multimodal therapy approach investigated in this study is a safe and effective treatment approach for treating Type 1a and 2b acute muscle injuries amongst elite football players and may help to prevent more severe, structural muscle injuries.
比较一种多模式治疗方法治疗精英足球运动员急性肌肉损伤的停工时间,该方法包括一种特定方案的近乎每日放射状体外冲击波治疗(rESWT),并与文献中报告的数据进行比较。
我们对参加上赛季德国甲级/乙级联赛的一支精英足球队球员的肌肉损伤治疗和康复时间进行了回顾性分析。
在上述赛季共诊断和治疗了 20 例急性肌肉损伤,其中 8 例(40%)为 1a 型/肌肉紧张损伤,5 例(25%)为 2b 型/肌肉劳损损伤,4 例(20%)为 3a 型/部分肌肉撕裂伤,3 例(15%)为挫伤。所有损伤均采用上述多模式治疗方法进行治疗。与 Ekstrand 等人报告的数据(Br J Sports Med 47:769-774, 2013)相比,1a 型损伤的停工时间(中位数/平均值)分别缩短了 54%和 58%,2b 型损伤分别缩短了 50%和 55%,3a 型损伤分别缩短了 8%和 21%。未观察到不良反应。
总的来说,本研究中调查的多模式治疗方法是治疗精英足球运动员 1a 型和 2b 型急性肌肉损伤的一种安全有效的治疗方法,可能有助于预防更严重的结构性肌肉损伤。