Baraldi James H, Martyn German V, Shurin Galina V, Shurin Michael R
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Biomedical Studies Program, Chatham University, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA.
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;14(8):1979. doi: 10.3390/cancers14081979.
The role of the nervous system in cancer development and progression has been under experimental and clinical investigation since nineteenth-century observations in solid tumor anatomy and histology. For the first half of the twentieth century, methodological limitations and opaque mechanistic concepts resulted in ambiguous evidence of tumor innervation. Differential spatial distribution of viable or disintegrated nerve tissue colocalized with neoplastic tissue led investigators to conclude that solid tumors either are or are not innervated. Subsequent work in electrophysiology, immunohistochemistry, pathway enrichment analysis, neuroimmunology, and neuroimmunooncology have bolstered the conclusion that solid tumors are innervated. Regulatory mechanisms for cancer-related neurogenesis, as well as specific operational definitions of perineural invasion and axonogenesis, have helped to explain the consensus observation of nerves at the periphery of the tumor signifying a functional role of nerves, neurons, neurites, and glia in tumor development.
自19世纪对实体瘤解剖学和组织学的观察以来,神经系统在癌症发生和发展中的作用一直处于实验和临床研究之中。在20世纪上半叶,方法学上的局限性和模糊的机制概念导致肿瘤神经支配的证据不明确。与肿瘤组织共定位的存活或解体神经组织的差异空间分布,使研究人员得出结论,实体瘤要么有神经支配,要么没有。随后在电生理学、免疫组织化学、通路富集分析、神经免疫学和神经免疫肿瘤学方面的工作支持了实体瘤有神经支配这一结论。癌症相关神经发生的调节机制,以及神经周围侵犯和轴突发生的具体操作定义,有助于解释在肿瘤周边观察到神经这一共识,即神经、神经元、神经突和神经胶质细胞在肿瘤发展中具有功能性作用。