Tuells José, Parra-Grande Mónica, Santos-Calle Francisco J, Montagud Ana C, Egoavil Cecilia M, García-Rivera Celia, Caballero Pablo, Gabaldón-Bravo Eva M, Rodríguez-Diaz Juan Carlos, Hurtado-Sánchez José Antonio
Department Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine and History of Science, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.
Microbiology Department, General University Hospital Alicante, 03010 Alicante, Spain.
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Mar 25;10(4):510. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10040510.
The presence of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against SARS-CoV-2 represent a surrogate marker of immunologic protection in populations at high risk of infection such as healthcare workers caring for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. As recommended by CDC and the European CDC, the use of rapid diagnostic tests during population-based evaluations offers an opportunity to identify individuals with serologic evidence of natural infection or who have undergone vaccination. We carried out a cross-sectional study to assess the presence of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 among medical providers at an intensive care unit of a large referral hospital in Alicante, Spain. In addition, we tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies compared to serum of uninfected individuals from a Biobank. We were also interested in evaluating the use of a rapid lateral flow immunochromatography (LFIC) test against a surrogate ELISA viral neutralization test (sVNT). This rapid test demonstrated a specificity of 1.000 95% CI (0.91-1.00) and the sensitivity of 0.987 95% CI (0.93-1.00). The negative predictive value was 95%. After six months, this rapid test demonstrated that those immunized with two doses of BioNTech/Pfizer vaccine, maintained optimal levels of neutralizing antibodies. We concluded that all Health Care Workers develop NAbs and the use of this rapid immunochromatographic test represents a potential tool to be used in population-based studies to detect serological antibody responses to vaccination. Vaccination policies could benefit from this tool to assess additional doses of vaccine or boosters among high-risk populations.
针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的中和抗体(NAbs)的存在,是感染高风险人群(如照顾新冠肺炎住院患者的医护人员)免疫保护的替代指标。按照美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)和欧洲疾病预防控制中心的建议,在基于人群的评估中使用快速诊断检测,为识别有自然感染血清学证据或已接种疫苗的个体提供了机会。我们开展了一项横断面研究,以评估西班牙阿利坎特一家大型转诊医院重症监护病房的医疗人员中针对SARS-CoV-2的中和抗体的存在情况。此外,我们将其与生物样本库中未感染个体的血清进行比较,检测中和抗体的存在情况。我们还对评估一种快速侧向流动免疫层析(LFIC)检测相对于替代酶联免疫吸附测定病毒中和试验(sVNT)的使用情况感兴趣。这种快速检测显示特异性为1.000,95%置信区间(0.91 - 1.00),敏感性为0.987,95%置信区间(0.93 - 1.00)。阴性预测值为95%。六个月后,这种快速检测表明,接种两剂BioNTech/辉瑞疫苗的人保持了最佳水平的中和抗体。我们得出结论,所有医护人员都会产生中和抗体,这种快速免疫层析检测的使用代表了一种可用于基于人群的研究以检测对疫苗接种的血清学抗体反应的潜在工具。疫苗接种政策可受益于该工具,以评估高危人群中的额外疫苗剂量或加强针。