Vitrat Virginie, Maillard Alexis, Raybaud Alain, Wackenheim Chloé, Chanzy Bruno, Nguyen Sophie, Valran Amélie, Bosch Alexie, Noret Marion, Delory Tristan
Infectious Diseases Department, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.
Clinical Research Unit, Annecy Genevois Hospital, 74370 Epagny Metz-Tessy, France.
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;9(8):824. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9080824.
We aimed to report SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence after the first wave of the pandemic among healthcare workers, and to explore factors associated with an increased infection rate. We conducted a multicentric cross-sectional survey from 27 June to 31 September 2020. For this survey, we enrolled 3454 voluntary healthcare workers across four participating hospitals, of which 83.4% were female, with a median age of 40.6 years old (31.8-50.3). We serologically screened the employees for SARS-CoV-2, estimated the prevalence of infection, and conducted binomial logistic regression with random effect on participating hospitals to investigate associations. We estimated the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection at 5.0% (95 CI, 4.3%-5.8%). We found the lowest prevalence in health professional management support (4.3%) staff. Infections were more frequent in young professionals below 30 years old (aOR = 1.59, (95 CI, 1.06-2.37)), including paramedical students and residents (aOR = 3.38, (95 CI, 1.62-7.05)). In this group, SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was up 16.9%. The location of work and patient-facing role were not associated with increased infections. Employees reporting contacts with COVID-19 patients without adequate protective equipment had a higher rate of infection (aOR = 1.66, (95 CI, 1.12-2.44)). Aerosol-generating tasks were associated with a ~1.7-fold rate of infection, regardless of the uptake of FFP2. Those exposed to clusters of infected colleagues (aOR = 1.77, (95 CI, 1.24-2.53)) or intra-familial COVID-19 relatives (aOR = 2.09, (95 CI, 1.15-3.80)) also had a higher likelihood of infection. This report highlights that a sustained availability of personal protective equipment limits the SARS-CoV-2 infection rate to what is measured in the general population. It also pinpoints the need for dedicated hygiene training among young professionals, justifies the systematic eviction of infected personnel, and stresses the need for interventions to increase vaccination coverage among any healthcare workers.
我们旨在报告第一波疫情大流行后医护人员中新冠病毒的血清流行率,并探索与感染率增加相关的因素。我们于2020年6月27日至9月31日进行了一项多中心横断面调查。在这项调查中,我们招募了来自四家参与医院的3454名自愿参与的医护人员,其中83.4%为女性,年龄中位数为40.6岁(31.8 - 50.3岁)。我们对员工进行了新冠病毒的血清学筛查,估计感染率,并对参与调查的医院进行了具有随机效应的二项逻辑回归分析以研究相关性。我们估计新冠病毒感染率为5.0%(95%置信区间,4.3% - 5.8%)。我们发现卫生专业管理支持人员的感染率最低(4.3%)。30岁以下的年轻专业人员感染更为频繁(调整后比值比 = 1.59,(95%置信区间,1.06 - 2.37)),包括医科学生和住院医生(调整后比值比 = 3.38,(95%置信区间,1.62 - 7.05))。在这一组中,新冠病毒流行率上升了16.9%。工作地点和面对患者的角色与感染增加无关。报告在未配备足够防护设备的情况下接触新冠患者的员工感染率更高(调整后比值比 = 1.66,(95%置信区间,1.12 - 2.44))。无论是否使用FFP2,产生气溶胶的任务与感染率约1.7倍的增加相关。那些接触感染同事聚集性感染(调整后比值比 = 1.77,(95%置信区间,1.24 - 2.53))或家庭内新冠亲属(调整后比值比 = 2.09,(95%置信区间,1.15 - 3.80))的人感染可能性也更高。本报告强调,持续提供个人防护设备可将新冠病毒感染率限制在普通人群所测得的水平。它还指出年轻专业人员需要专门的卫生培训,证明有必要系统地排除感染人员,并强调需要采取干预措施以提高所有医护人员的疫苗接种覆盖率。