Chen Xin, Liang Kaixin, Huang Liuyue, Mu Wenlong, Dong Wenjing, Chen Shiyun, Chen Sitong, Chi Xinli
School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China.
Center for Mental Health, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518061, China.
Children (Basel). 2022 Apr 2;9(4):499. doi: 10.3390/children9040499.
To date, the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) has been translated into several languages, including Chinese. This study aimed to explore the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the CAMM and to identify the appropriate cutoff score among Chinese primary school students. A total of 1283 participants (52.2% males; 11.52 ± 0.78 years of age) completed a series of questionnaires to evaluate their mental health, including mindfulness, subjective well-being, positive youth development (PYD), depression, and anxiety. Item analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM), criterion-related validity analysis, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis, and reliability analysis were performed. The results show that the Chinese version of the CAMM had acceptable item−scale correlation (r = 0.405−0.775, p < 0.001) and was the best fit for the two-factor ESEM model (χ2 = 168.251, p < 0.001, df = 26, TLI = 0.910, CFI = 0.948, RMSEA = 0.065, SRMR = 0.033) among Chinese primary school students. Additionally, the total score of the Chinese version of the CAMM was significantly associated with subjective well-being and PYD (r = 0.287−0.381, p < 0.001), and negatively associated with depression, and anxiety (r = −0.612−−0.542, p < 0.001). Moreover, a cutoff score of 22 or higher revealed a significant predictive power for all the included criteria. Finally, the Chinese version of the CAMM had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.826, McDonald’s ω = 0.826). Altogether, the Chinese version of the CAMM had satisfactory psychometric properties, and it can be applied to Chinese children.
迄今为止,儿童青少年正念量表(CAMM)已被翻译成多种语言,包括中文。本研究旨在探讨中文版CAMM的信效度,并确定中国小学生的合适临界分数。共有1283名参与者(52.2%为男性;年龄11.52±0.78岁)完成了一系列评估其心理健康的问卷,包括正念、主观幸福感、积极青少年发展(PYD)、抑郁和焦虑。进行了项目分析、验证性因素分析(CFA)、探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)、效标关联效度分析、接受者操作特征(ROC)分析和信度分析。结果表明,中文版CAMM具有可接受的项目-量表相关性(r = 0.405 - 0.775,p < 0.001),并且在中国小学生中最适合两因素ESEM模型(χ² = 168.251,p < 0.001,df = 26,TLI = 0.910,CFI = 0.948,RMSEA = 0.065,SRMR = 0.033)。此外,中文版CAMM的总分与主观幸福感和PYD显著相关(r = 0.287 - 0.381,p < 0.001),与抑郁和焦虑呈负相关(r = -0.612 - -0.542,p < 0.001)。此外,22分及以上的临界分数对所有纳入标准均显示出显著的预测能力。最后,中文版CAMM具有良好的内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.826,麦克唐纳ω系数 = 0.826)。总之,中文版CAMM具有令人满意的心理测量学特性,可应用于中国儿童。