Tan Wen-Ying, Chen Jia-Ni, Lu Sui-Hua, Liu Chun-Qin, Luo Qing, Ma Yu, Zhou Ying, Wong Thomas K S, Chen Hui-Fang, Song Li-Qin, Miao Chu-Yuan, Chen Jing-Wen, Smith Graeme D
School of Nursing, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
School of Guangzhou Health Science College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1276618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1276618. eCollection 2024.
Amidst the expansion of student enrollment in higher education, the well-being and retention rates of students have emerged as important concerns. Resilience, especially academic resilience, a multidimensional construct that can lead to academic success in adversity, is pivotal in enabling students to successfully cope with academic challenges. While the Academic Resilience Scale-30 (ARS-30) has been validated as an effective instrument in various languages, its applicability for Chinese students in higher education remains unexplored.
This study aims to translate and validate the ARS-30 in Chinese, assessing its reliability and validity among Chinese college students in higher education.
A convenience sample of 1,542 students participated in this study. The inventory included the demographic form, Chinese version of ARS-30 (C-ARS-30), 10-item Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10), and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). The assessment of validity was conducted by analyzing content validity, construct validity, convergent and discriminant validity, as well as criterion-related validity. Construct validity was evaluated through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM). Reliability analysis was performed using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability.
The C-ARS-30 demonstrated commendable content validity, with the CVI value of items ranging from 0.833 to 1.000, and a total scale CVI of 0.986. ESEM analysis revealed a solid four-factor structure, maintaining the scale's 30 items with excellent fit indices (χ/df = 2.647, CFI = 0.937, TLI = 0.915, RMSEA = 0.057, SRMR = 0.027). The total score of C-ARS-30 exhibited positive correlations with the CD-RISC-10 ( = 0.542) and the GSES ( = 0.488). The scale demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's = 0.930) and test-retest reliability (0.794, < 0.01).
The C-ARS-30 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing academic resilience among Chinese college students, offering a valuable tool for educational and psychological evaluations.
在高等教育扩招的背景下,学生的幸福感和留存率已成为重要关注点。心理韧性,尤其是学业心理韧性,是一个多维概念,能够在逆境中促成学业成功,对于帮助学生成功应对学业挑战至关重要。虽然学术心理韧性量表30(ARS - 30)已被验证为一种适用于多种语言的有效工具,但其在中国高等教育学生中的适用性仍未得到探索。
本研究旨在将ARS - 30翻译成中文并进行验证,评估其在中国高等院校学生中的信效度。
采用便利抽样法,1542名学生参与了本研究。问卷包括人口学信息表、ARS - 30中文版(C - ARS - 30)、10项Connor - Davidson心理韧性量表(CD - RISC - 10)和一般自我效能量表(GSES)。通过分析内容效度、结构效度、聚合效度和区分效度以及效标关联效度来进行效度评估。通过验证性因子分析(CFA)、探索性因子分析(EFA)和探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)来评估结构效度。使用Cronbach's α系数和重测信度进行信度分析。
C - ARS - 30表现出良好的内容效度,各项目的CVI值在0.833至1.000之间,总量表CVI为0.986。ESEM分析揭示了一个稳定的四因素结构,保留了量表的30个项目,拟合指数良好(χ/df = 2.647,CFI = 0.937,TLI = 0.915,RMSEA = 0.057,SRMR = 0.027)。C - ARS - 30总分与CD - RISC - 10(r = 0.542)和GSES(r = 0.488)呈正相关。该量表显示出较高的内部一致性(Cronbach's α = 0.930)和重测信度(0.794,p < 0.01)。
C - ARS - 30是评估中国大学生学业心理韧性的可靠且有效的工具,为教育和心理评估提供了有价值的手段。