Chung Krista Ching Wai, Nam Sujin, Li Sha, Fan Heidi Sze Lok, Wong Janet Yuen Ha, Kwok Jojo Yan Yan, Davies Hugh, Huang Lixi, Annunziata Maria Antonietta, Fong Daniel Yee Tak
School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong SAR, China.
School of Nursing, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 23;14:1122198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1122198. eCollection 2023.
The Cognitive Functioning Self-Assessment Scale (CFSS) was developed to allow the self-assessment of perceived cognitive functioning. It has been tested with satisfactory reliability and validity but was not available for the Chinese population. This study aimed to adapt and validate the Chinese version of the CFSS for community-dwelling adults.
A cross-sectional study of a sample of 1,002 Chinese adults from the general population was conducted online (July-August 2022). The Chinese version of the CFSS with 18 items was created through translation, cognitive debriefing, and psychometric evaluation. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on the first half of the randomly split sample. A model derived from EFA was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the second half of the sample. The model fits were further evaluated with and without subgrouping by age, gender, and education level. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α) and McDonald's omega hierarchical coefficients (ωH).
EFA ( = 460) revealed a three-factor solution, including spatio-temporal orientation, attention, and memory, which explained 51% of the total variance. The second-order CFA ( = 510) demonstrated a good fit: CFI = 0.951, TLI = 0.944, RMSEA = 0.054, SRMR = 0.040. A second-order multiple-group analysis showed that the structure was invariant by age, gender, and education level. The total CFSS score was significantly associated with the Chinese version of the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire ( = 0.56, < 0.001) and the Chinese version of the seven-item General Anxiety Disorder ( = 0.53, <0.001). The internal consistency reliability was satisfactory, with = 0.94 and ωH = 0.84. The item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.58 to 0.72.
The Chinese version of the CFSS possesses good item characteristics, satisfactory validity, and reliability for assessing self-reported cognitive functioning among community-dwelling adults. It is a feasible and appropriate self-assessment instrument to examine cognitive functioning in the Hong Kong Chinese population, which contributes to monitoring and developing strategies to prevent and manage cognitive impairment and disorders for the public's cognitive health and well-being.
认知功能自我评估量表(CFSS)旨在实现对感知到的认知功能的自我评估。该量表已进行测试,具有令人满意的信效度,但尚无中文版供中国人群使用。本研究旨在对CFSS中文版进行改编并验证其在社区居住成年人中的有效性。
于2022年7月至8月在线对1002名来自普通人群的中国成年人样本进行了横断面研究。通过翻译、认知反馈和心理测量评估创建了包含18个条目的CFSS中文版。对随机拆分样本的前半部分进行探索性因子分析(EFA)。在样本的后半部分通过验证性因子分析(CFA)对EFA得出的模型进行验证。在按年龄、性别和教育水平进行分组和不分组的情况下进一步评估模型拟合情况。使用克朗巴哈α系数(α)和麦克唐纳ω层级系数(ωH)评估内部一致性。
EFA(n = 460)得出一个三因素模型,包括时空定向、注意力和记忆,解释了总方差的51%。二阶CFA(n = 510)显示拟合良好:CFI = 0.951,TLI = 0.944,RMSEA = 0.054,SRMR = 0.040。二阶多组分析表明,该结构在年龄、性别和教育水平方面具有不变性。CFSS总分与中文版九项患者健康问卷显著相关(r = 0.56,P < 0.001),与中文版七项广泛性焦虑障碍问卷也显著相关(r = 0.53,P < 0.001)。内部一致性信度令人满意,α = 0.94,ωH = 0.84。项目与总分的相关系数范围为0.58至0.72。
CFSS中文版具有良好的项目特性,在评估社区居住成年人自我报告的认知功能方面具有令人满意的效度和信度。它是一种可行且合适的自我评估工具,用于检测香港中国人群的认知功能,有助于为公众的认知健康和福祉监测及制定预防和管理认知障碍及疾病的策略。