Suppr超能文献

一线医疗保健专业人员对新冠疫情对伦理决策影响的看法:爱沙尼亚的一项多中心混合方法研究

Frontline Healthcare Professionals' Views Regarding the Impact of COVID-19 on Ethical Decision-Making: A Multicentre Mixed-Methods Study from Estonia.

作者信息

Simm Kadri, Zameska Jay, Lubi Kadi

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, Institute of Philosophy and Semiotics, University of Tartu, 50090 Tartu, Estonia.

Tallinn Healthcare College, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 12;10(4):711. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040711.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to investigate frontline healthcare professionals' experiences and attitudes in relation to the COVID-19 pandemic's ethical and psychosocial aspects in Estonia. There were two research foci: first, ethical decision-making related to treating patients in the context of potential medical resource scarcity, and second, other psychosocial factors for healthcare professionals pertaining to coping, role conflicts, and the availability of institutional support.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted in the fall of 2020 amongst the frontline healthcare professionals working in the three most impacted hospitals; respondents were also drawn from two ambulance services. The focus of the survey was on the first wave of COVID-19 (spring 2020). A total of 215 respondents completed the quantitative survey and qualitative data were gathered from open comments.

RESULTS

Over half of the surveyed healthcare professionals in Estonia expressed confidence in their roles during the pandemic. More than half cited the complex ethical aspects related to their decisions as their main source of doubt and uncertainty. In response to this uncertainty, Estonian healthcare professionals drew on their previous training and experience, the policies and guidelines of their institution, and support from their colleagues, to aid their decision-making during the pandemic.

CONCLUSIONS

Although frontline healthcare professionals faced difficult decisions during the first wave of the pandemic, overall, most agreed that experiencing the pandemic reconfirmed that their work mattered greatly.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是调查爱沙尼亚一线医护人员在新冠疫情伦理和社会心理方面的经历与态度。有两个研究重点:第一,在潜在医疗资源稀缺情况下治疗患者的伦理决策;第二,医护人员在应对、角色冲突和机构支持可用性方面的其他社会心理因素。

方法

2020年秋季对在三家受影响最严重医院工作的一线医护人员进行了在线调查;受访者还来自两个救护服务机构。调查重点是新冠疫情的第一波(2020年春季)。共有215名受访者完成了定量调查,并从开放式评论中收集了定性数据。

结果

爱沙尼亚超过一半接受调查的医护人员表示对自己在疫情期间的角色充满信心。超过一半的人将与他们决策相关的复杂伦理问题作为主要的疑虑和不确定性来源。为应对这种不确定性,爱沙尼亚医护人员借鉴他们以前的培训和经验、所在机构的政策和指导方针以及同事的支持,以帮助他们在疫情期间做出决策。

结论

尽管一线医护人员在疫情第一波期间面临艰难决策,但总体而言,大多数人一致认为经历疫情再次证实了他们的工作非常重要。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

9
Depression and anxiety symptoms in pregnant women in Denmark during COVID-19.丹麦 COVID-19 大流行期间孕妇的抑郁和焦虑症状。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Nov;49(7):721-729. doi: 10.1177/14034948211013271. Epub 2021 May 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验