• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用感染后和接种疫苗后样本对九种新冠病毒2型IgG侧向流动检测方法的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Nine SARS-CoV-2 IgG Lateral Flow Assays Using Both Post-Infection and Post-Vaccination Samples.

作者信息

Mulder Leontine, Carrères Benoit, Muggli Franco, Zollinger Alix, Corthésy John, Klijn Adrianne, Togni Giuseppe

机构信息

Clinical Laboratory, Medlon BV, P.O. Box 50000, 7500 KA Enschede, The Netherlands.

Clinical Chemistry, Ziekenhuis Groep Twente, P.O. Box 7600, 7600 SZ Almelo, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 8;11(8):2100. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082100.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11082100
PMID:35456192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9032267/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, lateral flow assays (LFA) detecting specific antibodies have entered the market in abundance. Despite being CE-IVD-labeled, the antigenic compounds of the assays are often unknown, the performance characteristics provided by the manufacturer are often incomplete, and the samples used to obtain the data are not detailed.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comparative evaluation of nine lateral flow assays to detect IgG responses against SARS-CoV-2. For the evaluation, a carefully designed serum panel containing post-infection samples and post-vaccination (both mRNA vaccine and inactivated virus vaccine) samples was used.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the assays overall ranged from 9 to 90.3% and the specificity ranged from 94.2 to 100%. Spike protein-containing assays performed generally better than the assays with only nucleocapsid protein. The sensitivity of some assays was higher on post-infection samples, while other assays had a higher sensitivity to post-vaccination samples.

CONCLUSION

A comparative approach in the verification of LFAs with an adequately designed serum panel enabled the identification of the antigens used in the assays. Sensitivities differed between post-infection and post-vaccination samples, depending on the assays used. This demonstrates that the verification of assays must be performed with samples representative of the intended use of the assay.

摘要

背景

自新冠疫情以来,检测特定抗体的侧向流动分析(LFA)大量进入市场。尽管这些分析已获得CE-IVD认证,但其抗原成分往往不明,制造商提供的性能特征常常不完整,且用于获取数据的样本也未详细说明。

目的

对九种检测针对新冠病毒IgG反应的侧向流动分析进行比较评估。评估时使用了精心设计的血清样本组,其中包含感染后样本以及接种疫苗后(包括mRNA疫苗和灭活病毒疫苗)的样本。

结果

这些分析的总体灵敏度在9%至90.3%之间,特异性在94.2%至100%之间。含刺突蛋白的分析总体表现优于仅含核衣壳蛋白的分析。一些分析对感染后样本的灵敏度较高,而其他分析对接种疫苗后样本的灵敏度较高。

结论

采用精心设计的血清样本组对侧向流动分析进行比较验证,能够识别分析中使用的抗原。感染后样本和接种疫苗后样本的灵敏度因所使用的分析方法而异。这表明必须使用代表分析预期用途的样本进行分析验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/9032267/6b2c4960d084/jcm-11-02100-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/9032267/5714cf80b33a/jcm-11-02100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/9032267/8634042eae2f/jcm-11-02100-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/9032267/6b2c4960d084/jcm-11-02100-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/9032267/5714cf80b33a/jcm-11-02100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/9032267/8634042eae2f/jcm-11-02100-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36e9/9032267/6b2c4960d084/jcm-11-02100-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of Nine SARS-CoV-2 IgG Lateral Flow Assays Using Both Post-Infection and Post-Vaccination Samples.使用感染后和接种疫苗后样本对九种新冠病毒2型IgG侧向流动检测方法的比较研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 8;11(8):2100. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082100.
2
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Rapid Tests: Valuable Epidemiological Tools in Challenging Settings.SARS-CoV-2 抗体快速检测:在挑战性环境下极具价值的流行病学工具。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0025021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00250-21. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
3
Comprehensive characterization of the antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein finds additional vaccine-induced epitopes beyond those for mild infection.全面描述了针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白的抗体反应,发现了除轻度感染诱导的表位之外的其他疫苗诱导的表位。
Elife. 2022 Jan 24;11:e73490. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73490.
4
Antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals with and without COVID-19 vaccination: A method comparison of two different commercially available serological assays from the same manufacturer.针对 COVID-19 疫苗接种者和未接种者的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)抗体:来自同一制造商的两种不同商业可用血清学检测方法的比较方法。
Clin Chim Acta. 2021 Jul;518:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
5
A new testing platform using fingerstick blood for quantitative antibody response evaluation after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.一种新的检测平台,使用指尖采血进行 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种后的定量抗体反应评估。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022 Dec;11(1):250-259. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2023328.
6
Evaluation of Commercial Rapid Lateral Flow Tests, Alone or in Combination, for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Testing.评估商业快速侧向流动检测,单独或联合使用,用于 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jun 28;105(2):378-386. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1390.
7
Validation of Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in a Nigerian Population.在尼日利亚人群中验证商业 SARS-CoV-2 免疫测定。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0068021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00680-21. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
8
Analytical evaluation and critical appraisal of early commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays for routine use in a diagnostic laboratory.分析评估和批判性评价早期用于诊断实验室常规使用的 SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析。
Br J Biomed Sci. 2021 Jul;78(3):141-146. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2020.1864108. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Serological Assays for Assessing Postvaccination SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response.用于评估接种后 SARS-CoV-2 抗体反应的血清学检测方法。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0073321. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00733-21. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Clinical Evaluation of the Abbott Alinity SARS-CoV-2 Spike-Specific Quantitative IgG and IgM Assays among Infected, Recovered, and Vaccinated Groups.雅培Alinity SARS-CoV-2刺突特异性定量IgG和IgM检测在感染、康复和接种疫苗人群中的临床评估
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jun 18;59(7):e0038821. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00388-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of NADAL COVID IgG/IgM rapid test and DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG assay across different blood sources and substrates.NADAL COVID IgG/IgM快速检测与DiaSorin Liaison SARS-CoV-2 S1/S2 IgG检测在不同血液来源和基质中的比较。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0335024. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03350-24. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
2
Evaluation of the performance of a lateral flow device for quantitative detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG.用于定量检测抗SARS-CoV-2 IgG的侧向流动装置性能评估。
Clin Immunol Commun. 2022 Dec;2:130-135. doi: 10.1016/j.clicom.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnostic performance of two serological assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies: surveillance after vaccination.两种血清学检测方法用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 特异性抗体的诊断性能:疫苗接种后的监测。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2022 Apr;102(4):115650. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115650. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
2
Meta-analysis of the clinical performance of commercial SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid and antibody tests up to 22 August 2020.截至 2020 年 8 月 22 日的商业 SARS-CoV-2 核酸和抗体检测临床性能的荟萃分析。
Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(45). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.45.2001675.
3
SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Rapid Tests: Valuable Epidemiological Tools in Challenging Settings.
An update on lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.
用于快速检测新型冠状病毒2抗体的侧向流动免疫分析的最新进展。
AIMS Microbiol. 2023 Apr 13;9(2):375-401. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023020. eCollection 2023.
4
Nanotechnology meets immunology towards a rapid diagnosis solution: the COVID-19 outbreak challenge.纳米技术与免疫学结合以寻求快速诊断解决方案:应对新冠疫情的挑战
RSC Adv. 2022 Nov 4;12(49):31711-31728. doi: 10.1039/d2ra05096j. eCollection 2022 Nov 3.
SARS-CoV-2 抗体快速检测:在挑战性环境下极具价值的流行病学工具。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Oct 31;9(2):e0025021. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00250-21. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
Antibody responses after first and second Covid-19 vaccination in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者在接受第一剂和第二剂 COVID-19 疫苗后的抗体反应。
Blood Cancer J. 2021 Jul 30;11(7):136. doi: 10.1038/s41408-021-00528-x.
5
Increasing the Efficiency of a National Laboratory Response to COVID-19: a Nationwide Multicenter Evaluation of 47 Commercial SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays by 41 Laboratories.提高国家实验室应对 COVID-19 的效率:41 家实验室对 47 种商业 SARS-CoV-2 免疫测定试剂盒进行的全国多中心评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Aug 18;59(9):e0076721. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00767-21.
6
Performance of Three SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays, Three Rapid Lateral Flow Tests, and a Novel Bead-Based Affinity Surrogate Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Human Serum.三种 SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析、三种快速侧向流动检测以及一种新型基于珠粒的亲和力替代检测在人血清中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测中的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jul 19;59(8):e0031921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00319-21.
7
One year into the pandemic: Short-term evolution of SARS-CoV-2 and emergence of new lineages.大流行一年后:SARS-CoV-2 的短期演变和新谱系的出现。
Infect Genet Evol. 2021 Aug;92:104869. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104869. Epub 2021 Apr 26.
8
Diagnostic and analytical performance evaluation of ten commercial assays for detecting SARS-CoV-2 humoral immune response.十种用于检测 SARS-CoV-2 体液免疫反应的商业检测试剂盒的诊断和分析性能评估。
J Immunol Methods. 2021 Jun;493:113043. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2021.113043. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
9
Rapid point-of-care testing for COVID-19: quality of supportive information for lateral flow serology assays.用于 COVID-19 的即时检测:侧向流血清学检测的支持性信息质量。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 19;11(3):e047163. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047163.
10
Lessons learned 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 emergence leading to COVID-19 pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 引发 COVID-19 大流行一年后的经验教训。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021 Dec;10(1):507-535. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2021.1898291.