Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Jul 19;59(8):e0031921. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00319-21.
For the control of immunity in COVID-19 survivors and vaccinated subjects, there is an urgent need for reliable and rapid serological assays. Based on samples from 63 COVID-19 survivors up to 7 months after symptom onset, and on 50 serum samples taken before the beginning of the pandemic, we compared the performances of three commercial immunoassays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgA and IgG antibodies (Euroimmun SARS-COV-2 IgA/IgG, Mikrogen Well SARS-CoV-2 IgA/IgG, and Serion ELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgA/IgG) and three rapid lateral flow (immunochromatographic) tests (Abbott PanBio COVID-19 IgG/IgM, Nadal COVID-19 IgG/IgM, and Cleartest Corona 2019-nCOV IgG/IgM) with a 50% plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT50) representing the gold standard. Fifty-seven out of 63 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 patients (90%) showed neutralizing antibodies. The sensitivity of the seven assays ranged from 7.0% to 98.3%, and the specificity ranged from 86.0% to 100.0%. Only one commercial immunoassay showed a sensitivity and specificity of greater than 98%.
为了控制 COVID-19 幸存者和接种疫苗者的免疫,迫切需要可靠和快速的血清学检测方法。我们比较了三种商业免疫测定法(Euroimmun SARS-COV-2 IgA/IgG、Mikrogen Well SARS-CoV-2 IgA/IgG 和 Serion ELISA SARS-CoV-2 IgA/IgG)和三种快速侧向流动(免疫层析)检测方法(Abbott PanBio COVID-19 IgG/IgM、Nadal COVID-19 IgG/IgM 和 Cleartest Corona 2019-nCOV IgG/IgM),以及代表金标准的 50%蚀斑减少中和试验(PRNT50),这些检测方法基于 63 名症状出现后长达 7 个月的 COVID-19 幸存者的样本和 50 份大流行前采集的血清样本,以检测 SARS-CoV-2 IgA 和 IgG 抗体。63 例经 PCR 确诊的 COVID-19 患者中有 57 例(90%)显示出中和抗体。七种检测方法的灵敏度范围为 7.0%至 98.3%,特异性范围为 86.0%至 100.0%。只有一种商业免疫测定法的灵敏度和特异性大于 98%。