Istituto Biologia e Biotecnologia Agraria, Via Edoardo Bassini 15, 20131 Milano, Italy.
Genes (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;13(4):633. doi: 10.3390/genes13040633.
The simple and straightforward recognition of species is not an easy task due to their complex genetic origins. To provide a recommendation, we have compared the performance of different PCR-based methods relying on the discrimination ability of the and () genes, as well as TBP (Tubulin-Based Polymorphism), a method based on the multiple amplification of genes of the β-tubulin family. Among these approaches, the PCR-RFLP (Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism) assay based on a single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) present in the gene is the only one capable of fully discerning hexaploid spelt and common wheat species, while both and TBP fail with similar error frequencies. The assay results in the attainment of either a single fragment or a doublet, depending on the presence of a suitable restriction site, which is affected by the mutation. This dual pattern of resolution limits both the diagnostic effectiveness, when additional species are assayed and compared to each other, and its usefulness, when commercially available flours are analyzed. These limitations are overtaken by flanking the assay with the TBP analysis. In this way, almost all of the species can be accurately identified.
由于其复杂的遗传起源,简单明了地识别物种并不是一件容易的事。为了提供建议,我们比较了基于 PCR 的不同方法的性能,这些方法依赖于 和 () 基因的区分能力,以及 TBP(微管蛋白为基础的多态性),这是一种基于 β-微管蛋白家族基因的多重扩增的方法。在这些方法中,基于 基因中单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 的 PCR-RFLP(限制性片段长度多态性)检测是唯一能够完全区分六倍体斯佩耳特小麦和普通小麦的方法,而 和 TBP 的错误频率相似,都无法完全区分。该 检测的结果取决于是否存在合适的限制位点,而该限制位点受到突变的影响,要么产生单个片段,要么产生双联体。这种双重分辨率模式限制了其诊断效力,当对其他物种进行检测和比较时,也限制了其在分析市售面粉时的用途。通过将 TBP 分析与 检测相结合,可以克服这些局限性。通过这种方式,可以准确识别几乎所有的 物种。