Peterson E M, Alexander R, Aarnaes S L, King S, Greenwood J R, de la Maza L M
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1987 Feb;6(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(87)90098-8.
Three methods for Chlamydia trachomatis detection were compared: the Cellmatics (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI), a commercially available tissue culture system which contains a rat cell line; a direct fluorescent Chlamydia antibody (DFA) (Microtrak, Syva Corp., Palo Alto, California) stain; and a standard tissue culture isolation method employing McCoy cells. Of the 121 specimens in the study, 20 were positive by the standard cell culture. All 20 of these specimens were also positive by the Cellmatics but only 10 were positive by DFA.
Cellmatics(迪福公司,底特律,密歇根州),一种市售的组织培养系统,其中含有大鼠细胞系;直接荧光衣原体抗体(DFA)(Microtrak,赛瓦公司,帕洛阿尔托,加利福尼亚州)染色;以及采用 McCoy 细胞的标准组织培养分离方法。在该研究的 121 个标本中,20 个通过标准细胞培养呈阳性。所有这 20 个标本通过 Cellmatics 也呈阳性,但通过 DFA 仅 10 个呈阳性。